COVID-19 大流行期间虚拟评估中的学术不端行为:跨文化研究

Hossein Navidinia, Adrian Naznean, Maha Sourani, Nargess Hekmati
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间虚拟评估中的学术不端行为:跨文化研究","authors":"Hossein Navidinia, Adrian Naznean, Maha Sourani, Nargess Hekmati","doi":"10.1007/s40299-024-00829-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online teaching has gained more momentum since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this mode offers many benefits, one major concern is maintaining academic integrity, as online instruction can provide more opportunities for cheating. This study aimed to explore students’ attitudes toward cheating in online assessments (OAs) and any potential differences based on gender and nationality. Since our purpose was to perform a cross-cultural examination of cheating behaviors in an academic environment, we conducted the study in culturally diverse countries. The participants were 629 university students from Iran, Romania, and Lebanon. They completed a questionnaire about academic integrity in OAs. The results showed that 60% of the participants had no negative views on cheating in OAs, 58.5% admitted to cheating in OAs themselves, and 85% viewed OAs as less reliable than in-person assessments. During OAs, the most common ways of cheating included using notes on paper, relying on course materials, and sharing answers through social media and messaging apps. The main motivations for cheating included stress, time constraints, and the desire to achieve a higher grade, while factors that deterred cheating included moral and social stigma and the rights of other students. The study found no significant difference in attitudes toward cheating in OAs between male and female participants, but there were significant differences between students of different nationalities (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":501239,"journal":{"name":"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Dishonesty in Virtual Assessment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Study\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Navidinia, Adrian Naznean, Maha Sourani, Nargess Hekmati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40299-024-00829-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Online teaching has gained more momentum since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this mode offers many benefits, one major concern is maintaining academic integrity, as online instruction can provide more opportunities for cheating. This study aimed to explore students’ attitudes toward cheating in online assessments (OAs) and any potential differences based on gender and nationality. Since our purpose was to perform a cross-cultural examination of cheating behaviors in an academic environment, we conducted the study in culturally diverse countries. The participants were 629 university students from Iran, Romania, and Lebanon. They completed a questionnaire about academic integrity in OAs. The results showed that 60% of the participants had no negative views on cheating in OAs, 58.5% admitted to cheating in OAs themselves, and 85% viewed OAs as less reliable than in-person assessments. During OAs, the most common ways of cheating included using notes on paper, relying on course materials, and sharing answers through social media and messaging apps. The main motivations for cheating included stress, time constraints, and the desire to achieve a higher grade, while factors that deterred cheating included moral and social stigma and the rights of other students. The study found no significant difference in attitudes toward cheating in OAs between male and female participants, but there were significant differences between students of different nationalities (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00829-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00829-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 COVID-19 大流行病爆发以来,在线教学获得了更大的发展势头。虽然这种模式有很多好处,但其中一个主要问题是要保持学术诚信,因为在线教学可能会提供更多作弊的机会。本研究旨在探讨学生对在线评估(OA)中作弊行为的态度,以及基于性别和国籍的潜在差异。由于我们的目的是对学术环境中的作弊行为进行跨文化研究,因此我们在不同文化背景的国家开展了这项研究。参与者是来自伊朗、罗马尼亚和黎巴嫩的 629 名大学生。他们填写了一份关于开放大学学术诚信的调查问卷。结果显示,60%的参与者对 OA 中的作弊行为没有负面看法,58.5%的参与者承认自己在 OA 中作弊,85%的参与者认为 OA 的可靠性低于现场评估。在 OA 中,最常见的作弊方式包括使用纸上笔记、依赖课程材料以及通过社交媒体和消息应用程序分享答案。作弊的主要动机包括压力、时间限制和获得更高分的愿望,而阻止作弊的因素包括道德和社会耻辱感以及其他学生的权利。研究发现,男女受试者对 OA 作弊的态度没有明显差异,但不同国籍的学生之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Dishonesty in Virtual Assessment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Study

Online teaching has gained more momentum since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this mode offers many benefits, one major concern is maintaining academic integrity, as online instruction can provide more opportunities for cheating. This study aimed to explore students’ attitudes toward cheating in online assessments (OAs) and any potential differences based on gender and nationality. Since our purpose was to perform a cross-cultural examination of cheating behaviors in an academic environment, we conducted the study in culturally diverse countries. The participants were 629 university students from Iran, Romania, and Lebanon. They completed a questionnaire about academic integrity in OAs. The results showed that 60% of the participants had no negative views on cheating in OAs, 58.5% admitted to cheating in OAs themselves, and 85% viewed OAs as less reliable than in-person assessments. During OAs, the most common ways of cheating included using notes on paper, relying on course materials, and sharing answers through social media and messaging apps. The main motivations for cheating included stress, time constraints, and the desire to achieve a higher grade, while factors that deterred cheating included moral and social stigma and the rights of other students. The study found no significant difference in attitudes toward cheating in OAs between male and female participants, but there were significant differences between students of different nationalities (p < 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Differentiation is Sometimes a Hit and Miss”. Educator Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in the Higher Education Sector Towards Inclusive Classrooms: Shaping South African Higher Education for Employability Comparative Study About the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice Measuring the Efficiency of Educational Institutions: Evidence from Primary and Secondary Public Schools in the Philippines Development and Validation of Teachers’ Professional Well-Being Scale: A Study of Secondary School Teachers in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1