{"title":"丹麦语 rundt \"周围 \"是后置词？","authors":"Michael Nguyen","doi":"10.1017/cnj.2024.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this squib, I provide arguments in favour of the view that Danish rundt is a postposition. The functional, semantic, and syntactic properties of adpositions are discussed, and I show that competing analyses of rundt are falsifiable while the postposition analysis itself is not falsified.","PeriodicalId":513226,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Danish rundt ‘around’ as a postposition?\",\"authors\":\"Michael Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cnj.2024.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this squib, I provide arguments in favour of the view that Danish rundt is a postposition. The functional, semantic, and syntactic properties of adpositions are discussed, and I show that competing analyses of rundt are falsifiable while the postposition analysis itself is not falsified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2024.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2024.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇短文中，我提供了支持丹麦语 rundt 是后置词这一观点的论据。我讨论了副词的功能、语义和句法属性，并证明了对 rundt 的竞争分析是可证伪的，而后置词分析本身并没有被证伪。
In this squib, I provide arguments in favour of the view that Danish rundt is a postposition. The functional, semantic, and syntactic properties of adpositions are discussed, and I show that competing analyses of rundt are falsifiable while the postposition analysis itself is not falsified.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
