急诊科炎症性肠病患者对计算机断层扫描成像的认知价值:一项加拿大调查

Caleb A N Roda, Catherine Dube, Blair Macdonald, Ian G Stiell, H. Moloo, Anthony deBuck van Overstraeten, Sanjay Murthy, Ranjeeta Mallick, Jeffrey D McCurdy
{"title":"急诊科炎症性肠病患者对计算机断层扫描成像的认知价值:一项加拿大调查","authors":"Caleb A N Roda, Catherine Dube, Blair Macdonald, Ian G Stiell, H. Moloo, Anthony deBuck van Overstraeten, Sanjay Murthy, Ranjeeta Mallick, Jeffrey D McCurdy","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There are high rates of computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency department (ED) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), despite guidelines recommending judicious use. We performed a national survey to better understand perceptions and practice patterns of Canadian physicians related to CT imaging in the ED.\n \n \n \n Our survey was developed by a multistep iterative process with input from key stakeholders between 2021 and 2022. It evaluated Canadian gastroenterologists’, surgeons’, and emergency physicians’ (1) perceived rates of IBD findings detected by CT, (2) likelihood of performing CT for specific presentations and (3) comfort in diagnosing IBD phenotypes/complications without CT.\n \n \n \n A total of 208 physicians responded to our survey: median age 44 years (IQR, 37–50), 63% male, 68% academic, 44% emergency physicians, 39% gastroenterologists, and 17% surgeons. Compared with emergency physicians and surgeons, gastroenterologists more often perceived that CT would detect inflammation alone and less often IBD complications. Based on established rates in the literature, 13 (16%) gastroenterologists, 33 (40%) emergency physicians, and 21 (60%) surgeons overestimated the rates of at least one IBD complication. Although most physicians were more comfortable diagnosing inflammation compared to IBD complications without CT, gastroenterologists were significantly less likely to recommend CT imaging for non-obstructive/penetrating presentations compared with emergency physicians and surgeons with results that varied by IBD subtype.\n \n \n \n This national survey demonstrates differences in physician perceptions and practices regarding CT utilization in the ED and can be used as a framework for educational initiatives regarding appropriate usage of this modality.\n","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived value of computed tomography imaging for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the emergency department: a Canadian survey\",\"authors\":\"Caleb A N Roda, Catherine Dube, Blair Macdonald, Ian G Stiell, H. Moloo, Anthony deBuck van Overstraeten, Sanjay Murthy, Ranjeeta Mallick, Jeffrey D McCurdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwae001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n There are high rates of computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency department (ED) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), despite guidelines recommending judicious use. We performed a national survey to better understand perceptions and practice patterns of Canadian physicians related to CT imaging in the ED.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our survey was developed by a multistep iterative process with input from key stakeholders between 2021 and 2022. It evaluated Canadian gastroenterologists’, surgeons’, and emergency physicians’ (1) perceived rates of IBD findings detected by CT, (2) likelihood of performing CT for specific presentations and (3) comfort in diagnosing IBD phenotypes/complications without CT.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 208 physicians responded to our survey: median age 44 years (IQR, 37–50), 63% male, 68% academic, 44% emergency physicians, 39% gastroenterologists, and 17% surgeons. Compared with emergency physicians and surgeons, gastroenterologists more often perceived that CT would detect inflammation alone and less often IBD complications. Based on established rates in the literature, 13 (16%) gastroenterologists, 33 (40%) emergency physicians, and 21 (60%) surgeons overestimated the rates of at least one IBD complication. Although most physicians were more comfortable diagnosing inflammation compared to IBD complications without CT, gastroenterologists were significantly less likely to recommend CT imaging for non-obstructive/penetrating presentations compared with emergency physicians and surgeons with results that varied by IBD subtype.\\n \\n \\n \\n This national survey demonstrates differences in physician perceptions and practices regarding CT utilization in the ED and can be used as a framework for educational initiatives regarding appropriate usage of this modality.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":17263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"38 42\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管指南建议合理使用计算机断层扫描(CT),但急诊科(ED)中炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的使用率很高。我们进行了一项全国性调查,以更好地了解加拿大医生对急诊科 CT 成像的看法和实践模式。 我们的调查是在 2021 年至 2022 年期间,根据主要利益相关者的意见,通过多步骤迭代过程制定的。它评估了加拿大消化内科医生、外科医生和急诊科医生(1)通过 CT 发现 IBD 的认知率,(2)对特定表现进行 CT 检查的可能性,以及(3)在不进行 CT 检查的情况下诊断 IBD 表型/并发症的舒适度。 共有 208 名医生回复了我们的调查:中位年龄 44 岁(IQR,37-50),63% 为男性,68% 为学者,44% 为急诊内科医生,39% 为消化内科医生,17% 为外科医生。与急诊科医生和外科医生相比,消化科医生更倾向于认为 CT 只能发现炎症,而较少发现 IBD 并发症。根据文献中的既定比率,13 名(16%)消化内科医生、33 名(40%)急诊内科医生和 21 名(60%)外科医生高估了至少一种 IBD 并发症的发生率。虽然大多数医生在诊断炎症和 IBD 并发症时更倾向于不使用 CT,但与急诊内科医生和外科医生相比,消化内科医生明显不太可能建议对非梗阻性/穿透性表现进行 CT 成像检查,且结果因 IBD 亚型而异。 这项全国性调查显示了医生在急诊室使用 CT 方面的认知和实践差异,可作为适当使用这种方式的教育计划框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived value of computed tomography imaging for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the emergency department: a Canadian survey
There are high rates of computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency department (ED) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), despite guidelines recommending judicious use. We performed a national survey to better understand perceptions and practice patterns of Canadian physicians related to CT imaging in the ED. Our survey was developed by a multistep iterative process with input from key stakeholders between 2021 and 2022. It evaluated Canadian gastroenterologists’, surgeons’, and emergency physicians’ (1) perceived rates of IBD findings detected by CT, (2) likelihood of performing CT for specific presentations and (3) comfort in diagnosing IBD phenotypes/complications without CT. A total of 208 physicians responded to our survey: median age 44 years (IQR, 37–50), 63% male, 68% academic, 44% emergency physicians, 39% gastroenterologists, and 17% surgeons. Compared with emergency physicians and surgeons, gastroenterologists more often perceived that CT would detect inflammation alone and less often IBD complications. Based on established rates in the literature, 13 (16%) gastroenterologists, 33 (40%) emergency physicians, and 21 (60%) surgeons overestimated the rates of at least one IBD complication. Although most physicians were more comfortable diagnosing inflammation compared to IBD complications without CT, gastroenterologists were significantly less likely to recommend CT imaging for non-obstructive/penetrating presentations compared with emergency physicians and surgeons with results that varied by IBD subtype. This national survey demonstrates differences in physician perceptions and practices regarding CT utilization in the ED and can be used as a framework for educational initiatives regarding appropriate usage of this modality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Response from the Canadian Children Inflammatory Bowel Disease Network to the US Food and Drug Administration Draft Guidance for Industry on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: developing drugs for treatment. A Year in Review: JCAG's Inaugural Editorial Fellowship. Clinical features, management, and complications of paediatric button battery ingestions in Canada: an active surveillance study using surveys of Canadian paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists. Canadian female perspectives on training in the boys club: advanced therapeutic endoscopy. Acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the MyGut digital health platform in the monitoring and management of inflammatory bowel disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1