Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology最新文献

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and impacts compliance with conventional treatment. Gastroenterologists should understand the motivational factors of CAM use-factors that push patients away from standard therapy or pull towards CAM. Our study describes the motivations behind CAM use for IBD and evaluates differences between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

Methods: Retrospective cohort survey of patients over 18 years old with IBD, evaluated by gastroenterologists at a tertiary care referral centre from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Only patients who reported CAM use were included. Chi-square and independent t-tests were performed and P-value <0.05 was significant.

Results: Of the 230 completed surveys, 193 reported CAM use (CD: 57.5% vs UC: 42.5%). Demographics, disease duration, and hospitalizations were similar, but CD patients had lower SIBDQ scores (CD: 48.1 vs UC: 53.5, P < 0.001). Both groups were largely influenced by their social network to use CAM (CD: 33% vs UC: 31.3%) and did not feel well informed about CAM (87.4%). CD and UC patients had similar push and pull factors. Push factors included lack of improvement (39%) and side effects (20%) with conventional treatment. Pull factors included the desire for a holistic approach (21%) and to improve mood (35%). UC patients wanted a natural approach to treat their IBD, which nearly reached significance (P = 0.049). Most patients hoped fatigue 62.7%, and diarrhoea 61.7% would improve with CAM, but more CD patients wanted to improve their appetite (P = 0.043).

Conclusion: Despite differences in QoL, push and pull motivations for CAM use did not differ between CD and UC patients. Most users do not feel well informed of CAM and ongoing dialogue is important for patient-centred care.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwae018.].

Background: Computed tomography of the head (CT head) is frequently used for patients with cirrhosis presenting with suspected hepatic encephalopathy (HE).

Aims: The primary aims of this study were to assess the frequency of CT head usage in this patient population and to determine whether these scans yielded significant findings. Our secondary aims were to identify factors associated with the decision to order CTs and whether patients who received CTs had different outcomes.

Methods: A single-centre, retrospective chart review was performed. Patients presenting to the University of Alberta Hospital with cirrhosis and common liver disease aetiologies over a 27-month period were identified via discharge diagnosis codes. Charts of patients with suspected HE were manually identified. The use of a CT head was documented, as were patient demographics, cirrhosis aetiology, MELD, and outcomes. Comparisons were made between patients with and without CT head.

Results: A total of 119 encounters from 100 patients met our inclusion criteria. In 57% of encounters, a CT scan was performed on presentation. None of these CT scans had significant findings. Patient factors associated with the decision to order CT included older age, more preserved liver function, and longer length of time between patient's current and previous presentations. Patients who did not receive CT head had higher in-hospital mortality, which was likely reflective of more severe underlying liver dysfunction in this group.

Conclusions: The frequency of CT head usage in the studied patient population was high while the yield was low. This calls into question the usefulness of CT head in this population.

Background and aims: Endoscopic treatment is a definitive and cost-effective management strategy for early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus (BE). However, little is known of its impact on quality of life (QoL). This study reports outcomes of endoscopic eradication treatment (EET), focusing on QoL and costs in a Canadian tertiary referral centre.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained clinical database captured validated QoL metrics during and at the end of EET, risk factors for BE, treatment response, complications, costs, and follow-up response of all treated Barrett patients in Calgary and Southern Alberta, Canada.

Results: A total of 147 BE patients were treated from 2013 to 2021. All patients showed significant improvement in almost all QoL parameters except depression. There was significant improvement in 7 of the 8 QoL metrics in those who achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM). EET was successful in achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CED) and CEIM in 93.4% and 74.3% of patients, respectively, with a median of 3 radio frequency ablation treatments. Longer circumferential segments of BE (Cx) predicted a lower likelihood of achieving CEIM. The average total cost to achieve CED and CEIM were $10 414.58 and $9347.93CAD, respectively (compared to oesophagectomy estimated at $58 332.30 CAD).

Conclusion: This Canadian cohort reports significant post-treatment improvement in QoL parameters in patients treated to CEIM or CED over an 8-year period. EET for BE eradication is cost-effective compared to oesophagectomy. There was a low rate of complications and recurrence post-CEIM.

Background: In steroid-refractory acute, severe, ulcerative colitis (ASUC), salvage medical therapy with infliximab is recommended to reduce the risk of colectomy. However, the evidence supporting this practice is based on cohorts naïve to biologics. Consequently, the management of patients on biologic or small molecule therapy (BST) with ASUC is not well defined.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients admitted with ASUC to Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) in Toronto, Ontario from January 2018 until January 2022. Included subjects were considered to be on BST if they had received a dose of these agents within 56 days prior to admission. Our outcomes of interest included the mean difference in hospital length of stay (HLOS), rates of surgical consultation, rates of inpatient colectomies, and 90-day readmission rates between the 2 groups.

Results: Of the 185 admissions for ASUC, 76 were on BST prior to admission and 109 were not. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay (7.46 days vs 7.45 days P = .52) or in-hospital colectomy rates between the 2 groups. Patients on BST had higher rates of surgical consultation (36.8% vs 8.3% P < .01) and 90-day readmission rates (26.3% vs 13.8% P = .03).

Conclusions: We did not identify significant differences in the majority of our outcomes between the 2 groups. However, patients on BST were more likely to receive a surgical consultation during their admission and had higher rates of readmission at 90 days. Further studies evaluating the underlying factors that contribute to readmission in patients on BST in hospitals are needed.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a severe and debilitating illness that affects the quality of life and physical health of many Canadians. Given the dynamic and progressive nature of the disease, advanced therapies are required to support its long-term management. The emergence of small molecule therapies offers novel treatment options that target mechanisms central to the immunopathology of UC. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators and Janus-activated kinase inhibitors are 2 classes of therapies that target unique pathways to attenuate inflammation and modulate the immune response characteristic of UC. This review aims to provide practical guidance on how these therapeutic options can best be used to optimize treatment management and highlight the emerging role of small molecule therapies as a treatment strategy for UC.

Background: Hemorrhage is a common complication associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), usually following sphincterotomy. Studies investigating risk factors for hemorrhage including ERCP indication have been conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the association between the ERCP indication and hemorrhage.

Methods: Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were conducted to identify articles up to December 12, 2022. Randomized trials or observational studies of adult patients undergoing ERCP were included. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales for randomized trials and observational studies respectively was conducted. A random effects meta-analysis generating pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was conducted.

Results: A total of 1323 articles were identified of which 26 were included with up to 25 121 subjects in each meta-analysis. Rates of sphincterotomy (median 96.1%; IQR 60.5-100), biliary stent placement (median 17.2%; IQR 10.6-34.4), antiplatelet use (median 6.0%; IQR 0-10.1), and anticoagulant use (median 1.9%; IQR 0%-3.2%) varied among included studies. No specific indication was associated with hemorrhage in the meta-analyses including cholangitis (OR 1.50; 95% CI 0.97-2.32), choledocholithiasis/biliary stone (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.95-1.73), malignancy (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.66-1.42), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.72-2.40), and acute pancreatitis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.44-1.49).

Conclusions: Overall, no indication was significantly associated with increased hemorrhage following ERCP. However, given limitations in the included studies (ie, significant heterogeneity between studies), additional research to better characterize these associations is needed.

Protocol registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42021283978).