双氯芬酸-曲马多与双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚复方制剂用于剖腹产后疼痛控制:随机对照试验

P. C. Okoye, Ugoji DARLINTON-PETER CHIBUZOR, C. Anikwe, A. C. Ikeotuonye, Emmanuel Chijioke Uwakwe, Njideka Linda Okoye, I. Ebere
{"title":"双氯芬酸-曲马多与双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚复方制剂用于剖腹产后疼痛控制:随机对照试验","authors":"P. C. Okoye, Ugoji DARLINTON-PETER CHIBUZOR, C. Anikwe, A. C. Ikeotuonye, Emmanuel Chijioke Uwakwe, Njideka Linda Okoye, I. Ebere","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i02/1820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-Caesarean section morbidity due to pain is a health concern to both the mother and the clinician. This is because good post-operative pain control helps early recovery and mother-baby bonding with early discharge. Various combinations aimed at this have not had any consensus unlike labour analgesia. This study is aimed at helping clinicians in decision making toward post cesarean pain analgesia. Methodology: This was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial following Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia over a 6month period. One hundred and seventy eligible participants were randomized into two groups. Group A received intramuscular Tramadol 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Group B received intramuscular acetaminophen 600mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Both groups received Rectal Diclofenac 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. The first dose of the drugs was administered one hour after the surgery. All the participants received 10mg of prophylactic metoclopramide. The outcome measures were post-caesarean pain score, participants’ satisfaction and maternal side effects within the first 24 hours. The pain control was assessed using visual analogue scale while patients’ satisfaction was assessed with Likert scale. Analysis: Absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables, mean, range and standard deviation of continuous variables were calculated. Associations between continuous variables were analyzed using students t-test while chi-square (χ2) test (or Fisher’s exact test where applicable) was used for categorical variables. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The overall pain score was statistically significantly in the diclofenac-tramadol group (P-value <0.001). The Acetaminophen group required more rescue analgesia (63.5% Vs 34.1%) and this was statistically significant (P-value <0.001). The level of association between the types of caesarean section and pain scores both at rest and with movement was statistically significant, with Tramadol group having better pain control. The composite scores in both groups, both at rest, with movement and the types of caesarean section were not statistically significant. On patients satisfaction, 67.1% of the diclofenac-tramadol group was very satisfied as against 30.6% in the diclofenac-acetaminophen group and was statistically significant (P-value = 0.001). The side effect profile was not significant between the two groups. However, the commonest side effects were Dizziness and nausea, which were more in the Tramadol group (10.6% Vs 7.1%). Conclusion: The diclofenac–tramadol combination was more effective in pain control with better patients’ satisfaction and minimal side effects.","PeriodicalId":503777,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","volume":"59 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diclofenac-Tramadol Versus Diclofenac-Acetaminophen Combination for Post Caesarean Section Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"P. C. Okoye, Ugoji DARLINTON-PETER CHIBUZOR, C. Anikwe, A. C. Ikeotuonye, Emmanuel Chijioke Uwakwe, Njideka Linda Okoye, I. Ebere\",\"doi\":\"10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i02/1820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Post-Caesarean section morbidity due to pain is a health concern to both the mother and the clinician. This is because good post-operative pain control helps early recovery and mother-baby bonding with early discharge. Various combinations aimed at this have not had any consensus unlike labour analgesia. This study is aimed at helping clinicians in decision making toward post cesarean pain analgesia. Methodology: This was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial following Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia over a 6month period. One hundred and seventy eligible participants were randomized into two groups. Group A received intramuscular Tramadol 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Group B received intramuscular acetaminophen 600mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Both groups received Rectal Diclofenac 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. The first dose of the drugs was administered one hour after the surgery. All the participants received 10mg of prophylactic metoclopramide. The outcome measures were post-caesarean pain score, participants’ satisfaction and maternal side effects within the first 24 hours. The pain control was assessed using visual analogue scale while patients’ satisfaction was assessed with Likert scale. Analysis: Absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables, mean, range and standard deviation of continuous variables were calculated. Associations between continuous variables were analyzed using students t-test while chi-square (χ2) test (or Fisher’s exact test where applicable) was used for categorical variables. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The overall pain score was statistically significantly in the diclofenac-tramadol group (P-value <0.001). The Acetaminophen group required more rescue analgesia (63.5% Vs 34.1%) and this was statistically significant (P-value <0.001). The level of association between the types of caesarean section and pain scores both at rest and with movement was statistically significant, with Tramadol group having better pain control. The composite scores in both groups, both at rest, with movement and the types of caesarean section were not statistically significant. On patients satisfaction, 67.1% of the diclofenac-tramadol group was very satisfied as against 30.6% in the diclofenac-acetaminophen group and was statistically significant (P-value = 0.001). The side effect profile was not significant between the two groups. However, the commonest side effects were Dizziness and nausea, which were more in the Tramadol group (10.6% Vs 7.1%). Conclusion: The diclofenac–tramadol combination was more effective in pain control with better patients’ satisfaction and minimal side effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"59 39\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i02/1820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i02/1820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖腹产术后疼痛导致的发病率是产妇和临床医生共同关注的健康问题。这是因为良好的术后疼痛控制有助于早日康复和母婴关系的建立,并使产妇早日出院。与分娩镇痛不同的是,旨在实现这一目标的各种组合尚未达成共识。本研究旨在帮助临床医生对剖宫产术后疼痛镇痛做出决策。研究方法:这是一项为期 6 个月的双盲随机对照试验。170 名符合条件的参与者被随机分为两组。A 组接受肌肉注射曲马多 100 毫克,每小时 8 次,持续 24 小时。B 组肌肉注射对乙酰氨基酚 600 毫克,每小时 8 次,连续 24 小时。两组均接受直肠给药双氯芬酸 100 毫克,每小时 8 次,共 24 小时。第一剂药物在手术后一小时服用。所有参与者都接受了 10 毫克甲氧氯普胺的预防性治疗。结果测量指标为剖腹产后疼痛评分、参与者的满意度和头 24 小时内的产妇副作用。疼痛控制采用视觉模拟量表进行评估,患者满意度采用李克特量表进行评估。分析:计算分类变量的绝对频率和相对频率,连续变量的平均值、范围和标准差。连续变量之间的关联采用学生 t 检验进行分析,分类变量采用卡方(χ2)检验(或费雪精确检验(如适用))。P 值小于 0.05 为显著。结果双氯芬酸-曲马多组的总体疼痛评分具有显著统计学意义(P 值<0.001)。对乙酰氨基酚组需要更多的抢救性镇痛(63.5% 对 34.1%),这在统计学上有显著意义(P 值<0.001)。剖腹产类型与静息和运动时的疼痛评分之间的关联程度具有统计学意义,曲马多组的疼痛控制效果更好。两组患者在静息、活动和剖腹产类型方面的综合评分均无统计学意义。在患者满意度方面,67.1% 的双氯芬酸-曲马多组患者表示非常满意,而双氯芬酸-对乙酰氨基酚组仅为 30.6%,差异有统计学意义(P 值 = 0.001)。两组患者的副作用差异不大。不过,最常见的副作用是头晕和恶心,曲马多组的副作用更大(10.6% 对 7.1%)。结论双氯芬酸-曲马多联合用药能更有效地控制疼痛,患者的满意度更高,副作用更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diclofenac-Tramadol Versus Diclofenac-Acetaminophen Combination for Post Caesarean Section Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Post-Caesarean section morbidity due to pain is a health concern to both the mother and the clinician. This is because good post-operative pain control helps early recovery and mother-baby bonding with early discharge. Various combinations aimed at this have not had any consensus unlike labour analgesia. This study is aimed at helping clinicians in decision making toward post cesarean pain analgesia. Methodology: This was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial following Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia over a 6month period. One hundred and seventy eligible participants were randomized into two groups. Group A received intramuscular Tramadol 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Group B received intramuscular acetaminophen 600mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. Both groups received Rectal Diclofenac 100mg 8 hourly for 24 hours. The first dose of the drugs was administered one hour after the surgery. All the participants received 10mg of prophylactic metoclopramide. The outcome measures were post-caesarean pain score, participants’ satisfaction and maternal side effects within the first 24 hours. The pain control was assessed using visual analogue scale while patients’ satisfaction was assessed with Likert scale. Analysis: Absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables, mean, range and standard deviation of continuous variables were calculated. Associations between continuous variables were analyzed using students t-test while chi-square (χ2) test (or Fisher’s exact test where applicable) was used for categorical variables. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The overall pain score was statistically significantly in the diclofenac-tramadol group (P-value <0.001). The Acetaminophen group required more rescue analgesia (63.5% Vs 34.1%) and this was statistically significant (P-value <0.001). The level of association between the types of caesarean section and pain scores both at rest and with movement was statistically significant, with Tramadol group having better pain control. The composite scores in both groups, both at rest, with movement and the types of caesarean section were not statistically significant. On patients satisfaction, 67.1% of the diclofenac-tramadol group was very satisfied as against 30.6% in the diclofenac-acetaminophen group and was statistically significant (P-value = 0.001). The side effect profile was not significant between the two groups. However, the commonest side effects were Dizziness and nausea, which were more in the Tramadol group (10.6% Vs 7.1%). Conclusion: The diclofenac–tramadol combination was more effective in pain control with better patients’ satisfaction and minimal side effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowlegde, Attitude and Practice of Vaginal Douching in Non-Medical Undergraduates in a South Eastern Nigerian University Student Academic Success Factors in Selected Nursing Collages in Saudi Arabia 3D Printed Maxillofacial Trauma Plates as a Valuable Alternative to Conventional Miniplates: A Case Report Multidisciplinary Approach of a Rare Case of Placenta Increta with Multiple Comorbidities: A Case Report Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Endometrial Cancer in A 65-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1