机器学习预测蛛网膜下腔出血患者的脑血管痉挛

David Zarrin, Abhinav Suri, Karen McCarthy, Bilwaj Gaonkar, Bayard Wilson, Geoffrey Colby, Robert Freundlich, Luke Macyszyn, Eilon Gabel
{"title":"机器学习预测蛛网膜下腔出血患者的脑血管痉挛","authors":"David Zarrin, Abhinav Suri, Karen McCarthy, Bilwaj Gaonkar, Bayard Wilson, Geoffrey Colby, Robert Freundlich, Luke Macyszyn, Eilon Gabel","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3617246/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a feared complication occurring in 20-40% of patients following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and is known to contribute to delayed cerebral ischemia. It is standard practice to admit SAH patients to intensive care for an extended period of vigilant, resource-intensive, clinical monitoring. We used machine learning to predict CV requiring verapamil (CVRV) in the largest and only multi-center study to date. Methods SAH patients admitted to UCLA from 2013-2022 and a validation cohort from VUMC from 2018-2023 were included. For each patient, 172 unique intensive care unit (ICU) variables were extracted through the primary endpoint, namely first verapamil administration or ICU downgrade. At each institution, a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) was trained using five-fold cross validation to predict the primary endpoint at various timepoints during hospital admission. Receiver-operator curves (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) curves were generated. Results A total of 1,750 patients were included from UCLA, 125 receiving verapamil. LightGBM achieved an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.88 an average of over one week in advance, and successfully ruled out 8% of non-verapamil patients with zero false negatives. Minimum leukocyte count, maximum platelet count, and maximum intracranial pressure were the variables with highest predictive accuracy. Our models predicted “no CVRV” vs “CVRV within three days” vs “CVRV after three days” with AUCs=0.88, 0.83, and 0.88, respectively. For external validation at VUMC, 1,654 patients were included, 75 receiving verapamil. Predictive models at VUMC performed very similarly to those at UCLA, averaging 0.01 AUC points lower. Conclusions We present an accurate (AUC=0.88) and early (>1 week prior) predictor of CVRV using machine learning over two large cohorts of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at separate institutions. This represents a significant step towards optimized clinical management and improved resource allocation in the intensive care setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":"57 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Predicts Cerebral Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients\",\"authors\":\"David Zarrin, Abhinav Suri, Karen McCarthy, Bilwaj Gaonkar, Bayard Wilson, Geoffrey Colby, Robert Freundlich, Luke Macyszyn, Eilon Gabel\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3617246/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a feared complication occurring in 20-40% of patients following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and is known to contribute to delayed cerebral ischemia. It is standard practice to admit SAH patients to intensive care for an extended period of vigilant, resource-intensive, clinical monitoring. We used machine learning to predict CV requiring verapamil (CVRV) in the largest and only multi-center study to date. Methods SAH patients admitted to UCLA from 2013-2022 and a validation cohort from VUMC from 2018-2023 were included. For each patient, 172 unique intensive care unit (ICU) variables were extracted through the primary endpoint, namely first verapamil administration or ICU downgrade. At each institution, a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) was trained using five-fold cross validation to predict the primary endpoint at various timepoints during hospital admission. Receiver-operator curves (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) curves were generated. Results A total of 1,750 patients were included from UCLA, 125 receiving verapamil. LightGBM achieved an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.88 an average of over one week in advance, and successfully ruled out 8% of non-verapamil patients with zero false negatives. Minimum leukocyte count, maximum platelet count, and maximum intracranial pressure were the variables with highest predictive accuracy. Our models predicted “no CVRV” vs “CVRV within three days” vs “CVRV after three days” with AUCs=0.88, 0.83, and 0.88, respectively. For external validation at VUMC, 1,654 patients were included, 75 receiving verapamil. Predictive models at VUMC performed very similarly to those at UCLA, averaging 0.01 AUC points lower. Conclusions We present an accurate (AUC=0.88) and early (>1 week prior) predictor of CVRV using machine learning over two large cohorts of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at separate institutions. This represents a significant step towards optimized clinical management and improved resource allocation in the intensive care setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square\",\"volume\":\"57 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3617246/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3617246/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 背景 脑血管痉挛(CV)是蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后发生的一种可怕的并发症,20%-40% 的患者都会出现这种症状,而且众所周知,CV 会导致延迟性脑缺血。标准做法是将蛛网膜下腔出血患者送入重症监护室,进行长时间的警惕性、资源密集型临床监测。我们在迄今为止最大且唯一的一项多中心研究中使用机器学习预测需要维拉帕米的心血管疾病(CVRV)。方法 纳入了 2013-2022 年期间在 UCLA 住院的 SAH 患者和 2018-2023 年期间在 VUMC 住院的验证队列。通过主要终点,即首次使用维拉帕米或 ICU 降级,为每位患者提取了 172 个独特的重症监护室(ICU)变量。在每个机构,使用五倍交叉验证训练光梯度增强机(LightGBM),以预测入院期间不同时间点的主要终点。生成了接收器-操作者曲线(ROC)和精确度-召回曲线(PR)。结果 加州大学洛杉矶分校共纳入 1750 名患者,其中 125 人接受维拉帕米治疗。LightGBM 的 ROC (AUC) 平均提前超过一周,达到 0.88,成功排除了 8% 的非维拉帕米患者,假阴性率为零。最小白细胞计数、最大血小板计数和最大颅内压是预测准确率最高的变量。我们的模型预测 "无 CVRV "与 "三天内 CVRV "与 "三天后 CVRV "的 AUC 分别为 0.88、0.83 和 0.88。在弗吉尼亚大学医学院进行外部验证时,共纳入了 1654 名患者,其中 75 人接受了维拉帕米治疗。VUMC 的预测模型与加州大学洛杉矶分校的预测模型表现非常相似,平均 AUC 低 0.01 个点。结论 我们提出了一种准确(AUC=0.88)且早期(>1 周前)的 CVRV 预测方法,该方法是利用机器学习对两个不同机构的大量蛛网膜下腔出血患者进行预测。这标志着我们在优化临床管理和改善蛛网膜下腔出血患者重症监护的资源分配方面迈出了重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Predicts Cerebral Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients
Abstract Background Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a feared complication occurring in 20-40% of patients following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and is known to contribute to delayed cerebral ischemia. It is standard practice to admit SAH patients to intensive care for an extended period of vigilant, resource-intensive, clinical monitoring. We used machine learning to predict CV requiring verapamil (CVRV) in the largest and only multi-center study to date. Methods SAH patients admitted to UCLA from 2013-2022 and a validation cohort from VUMC from 2018-2023 were included. For each patient, 172 unique intensive care unit (ICU) variables were extracted through the primary endpoint, namely first verapamil administration or ICU downgrade. At each institution, a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) was trained using five-fold cross validation to predict the primary endpoint at various timepoints during hospital admission. Receiver-operator curves (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) curves were generated. Results A total of 1,750 patients were included from UCLA, 125 receiving verapamil. LightGBM achieved an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.88 an average of over one week in advance, and successfully ruled out 8% of non-verapamil patients with zero false negatives. Minimum leukocyte count, maximum platelet count, and maximum intracranial pressure were the variables with highest predictive accuracy. Our models predicted “no CVRV” vs “CVRV within three days” vs “CVRV after three days” with AUCs=0.88, 0.83, and 0.88, respectively. For external validation at VUMC, 1,654 patients were included, 75 receiving verapamil. Predictive models at VUMC performed very similarly to those at UCLA, averaging 0.01 AUC points lower. Conclusions We present an accurate (AUC=0.88) and early (>1 week prior) predictor of CVRV using machine learning over two large cohorts of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at separate institutions. This represents a significant step towards optimized clinical management and improved resource allocation in the intensive care setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structure of METTL3-METTL14 with an m6A nucleotide reveals insights into m6A conversion and sensing. Combination of a MIP3α-antigen fusion therapeutic DNA vaccine with treatments of IFNα and 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine enhances activated effector CD8+ T cells expressing CD11c in the B16F10 melanoma model. Disparity in temporal and spatial relationships between resting-state electrophysiological and fMRI signals. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1