长期护理医院的感染控制措施绩效及其与联合委员会评审的关系

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.02.005
Stephen P. Schmaltz PhD, MPH, MS (is Senior Biostatistician, Department of Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.), Beth A. Longo DrPH, MSN, RN (is Associate Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission.), Scott C. Williams PsyD (is Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission. Please address correspondence to Beth A. Longo)
{"title":"长期护理医院的感染控制措施绩效及其与联合委员会评审的关系","authors":"Stephen P. Schmaltz PhD, MPH, MS (is Senior Biostatistician, Department of Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.),&nbsp;Beth A. Longo DrPH, MSN, RN (is Associate Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission.),&nbsp;Scott C. Williams PsyD (is Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission. Please address correspondence to Beth A. Longo)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluated the relationship between Joint Commission accreditation and health care–associated infections (HAIs) in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study used Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) LTCH data for the period 2017 to June 2021. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) of three measures used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network were used as dependent variables in a random coefficient Poisson regression model (adjusting for CMS region, owner type, and bed size quartile): catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infections (CDIs), and central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) for the periods 2017 to 2019 and July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Data from January 1 to June 30, 2020, were excluded due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data set included 244 (73.3%) Joint Commission–accredited and 89 (26.7%) non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs. Compared to non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs, accredited LTCHs had significantly better (lower) SIRs for CLABSI and CAUTI measures, although no differences were observed for CDI SIRs. There were no significant differences in year trends for any of the HAI measures. For each year of the study period, a greater proportion of Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs performed significantly better than the national benchmark for all three measures (<em>p</em> = 0.04 for CAUTI, <em>p</em> = 0.02 for CDI, <em>p</em> = 0.01 for CLABSI).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although this study was not designed to establish causality, positive associations were observed between Joint Commission accreditation and CLABSI and CAUTI measures, and Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs attained more consistent high performance over the four-year study period for all three measures. Influencing factors may include the focus of Joint Commission standards on infection control and prevention (ICP), including the hierarchical approach to selecting ICP–related standards as inputs into LTCH policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"50 6","pages":"Pages 425-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection Control Measure Performance in Long-Term Care Hospitals and Their Relationship to Joint Commission Accreditation\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P. Schmaltz PhD, MPH, MS (is Senior Biostatistician, Department of Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.),&nbsp;Beth A. Longo DrPH, MSN, RN (is Associate Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission.),&nbsp;Scott C. Williams PsyD (is Director, Department of Research, The Joint Commission. Please address correspondence to Beth A. Longo)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluated the relationship between Joint Commission accreditation and health care–associated infections (HAIs) in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This observational study used Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) LTCH data for the period 2017 to June 2021. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) of three measures used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network were used as dependent variables in a random coefficient Poisson regression model (adjusting for CMS region, owner type, and bed size quartile): catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infections (CDIs), and central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) for the periods 2017 to 2019 and July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Data from January 1 to June 30, 2020, were excluded due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data set included 244 (73.3%) Joint Commission–accredited and 89 (26.7%) non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs. Compared to non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs, accredited LTCHs had significantly better (lower) SIRs for CLABSI and CAUTI measures, although no differences were observed for CDI SIRs. There were no significant differences in year trends for any of the HAI measures. For each year of the study period, a greater proportion of Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs performed significantly better than the national benchmark for all three measures (<em>p</em> = 0.04 for CAUTI, <em>p</em> = 0.02 for CDI, <em>p</em> = 0.01 for CLABSI).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although this study was not designed to establish causality, positive associations were observed between Joint Commission accreditation and CLABSI and CAUTI measures, and Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs attained more consistent high performance over the four-year study period for all three measures. Influencing factors may include the focus of Joint Commission standards on infection control and prevention (ICP), including the hierarchical approach to selecting ICP–related standards as inputs into LTCH policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 425-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024000576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024000576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究评估了联合委员会认证与长期护理医院(LTCHs)中医疗相关感染(HAIs)之间的关系。方法本观察性研究使用了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)2017 年至 2021 年 6 月期间的长期护理医院数据。在随机系数泊松回归模型(调整了 CMS 地区、所有者类型和床位规模四分位数)中,疾病控制与预防中心的国家医疗保健安全网络所使用的三项指标的标准化感染率 (SIR) 被用作因变量:2017 年至 2019 年和 2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间的导管相关性尿路感染 (CAUTI)、艰难梭菌感染 (CDI) 和中心管线相关性血流感染 (CLABSI)。由于COVID-19大流行,2020年1月1日至6月30日的数据被排除在外。结果数据集包括244家(73.3%)通过联合委员会认证的长期住院医师和89家(26.7%)未通过联合委员会认证的长期住院医师。与未通过联合委员会认证的长期住院病床相比,通过认证的长期住院病床在CLABSI和CAUTI指标方面的SIR明显更高(更低),但在CDI SIR方面未观察到差异。任何一项 HAI 指标的年度趋势均无明显差异。在研究期间的每一年,获得联合委员会认证的LTCH中,有更大比例的医院在所有三项指标上的表现都明显优于国家基准(CAUTI的P = 0.04,CDI的P = 0.02,CLABSI的P = 0.01)。结论虽然本研究的目的不是为了确定因果关系,但在联合委员会认证与CLABSI和CAUTI指标之间观察到了正相关,在四年的研究期间,获得联合委员会认证的LTCH在所有三项指标上的表现都更加稳定。影响因素可能包括联合委员会标准对感染控制和预防(ICP)的关注,包括分级选择ICP相关标准作为LTCH政策的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infection Control Measure Performance in Long-Term Care Hospitals and Their Relationship to Joint Commission Accreditation

Background

This study evaluated the relationship between Joint Commission accreditation and health care–associated infections (HAIs) in long-term care hospitals (LTCHs).

Methods

This observational study used Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) LTCH data for the period 2017 to June 2021. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) of three measures used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network were used as dependent variables in a random coefficient Poisson regression model (adjusting for CMS region, owner type, and bed size quartile): catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), and central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) for the periods 2017 to 2019 and July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Data from January 1 to June 30, 2020, were excluded due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

The data set included 244 (73.3%) Joint Commission–accredited and 89 (26.7%) non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs. Compared to non–Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs, accredited LTCHs had significantly better (lower) SIRs for CLABSI and CAUTI measures, although no differences were observed for CDI SIRs. There were no significant differences in year trends for any of the HAI measures. For each year of the study period, a greater proportion of Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs performed significantly better than the national benchmark for all three measures (p = 0.04 for CAUTI, p = 0.02 for CDI, p = 0.01 for CLABSI).

Conclusion

Although this study was not designed to establish causality, positive associations were observed between Joint Commission accreditation and CLABSI and CAUTI measures, and Joint Commission–accredited LTCHs attained more consistent high performance over the four-year study period for all three measures. Influencing factors may include the focus of Joint Commission standards on infection control and prevention (ICP), including the hierarchical approach to selecting ICP–related standards as inputs into LTCH policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Examining Patient Safety Events Using the Behaviour Change Wheel: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections by Leadership Focus on Process Measures. Implementation of the Revised American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hyperbilirubinemia Decreases Necessity for Serum Bilirubin and Phototherapy. The Impact of a Cohort Structure on Grantee Experiences Developing Clinical Quality Measures for Diagnostic Excellence. The Scholarly Upside to MOC4.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1