Nicolás Contrera Rolón , Joaquín Cantos , Iván Huespe , Eduardo Prado , Griselda I. Bratti , Carlos Schreck , Sergio Giannasi , Guillermo Rosa Diez , Carlos F. Varela
{"title":"评估脓毒症患者持续性 AKI 时钠离子和钾离子的分排泄量以及尿液中强离子的差异。","authors":"Nicolás Contrera Rolón , Joaquín Cantos , Iván Huespe , Eduardo Prado , Griselda I. Bratti , Carlos Schreck , Sergio Giannasi , Guillermo Rosa Diez , Carlos F. Varela","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span><span>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of FENa (Fractional excretion of sodium), FEK (fractional excretion of potassium) and uSID (urinary strong ion difference) in predicting pAKI in </span>sepsis and </span>septic shock.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Two intensive care units in Argentina.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div><span><span>Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock<span> and AKI, and had a </span></span>urinary biochemistry within 24</span> <span>h of the AKI diagnosis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FENa, FEK and uSID through a ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>80 patients were included. 40 patients presented pAKI. pAKI group had higher APACHE, SOFA score<span>, and mortality rate. In the ROC curve analysis, uSID had no diagnostic utility (AUC</span></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.52, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.69). FENa presented moderate accuracy showing an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60−0.83; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), while FEK presented low accuracy with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57−0.80; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). The optimal Youden point for identifying pAKI was at a FENa higher than 0.51 % with a specificity of 72.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%. In the case of FEK, a value higher than 21.9 % presented the best relation, with a specificity of 67.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>urine biochemistry interpretation in septic patients must be revised. FENa and FEK are related to the severity of AKI and could be helpful complementary tools for diagnosing pAKI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractional excretion of sodium and potassium and urinary strong ion difference in the evaluation of persistent AKI in sepsis\",\"authors\":\"Nicolás Contrera Rolón , Joaquín Cantos , Iván Huespe , Eduardo Prado , Griselda I. Bratti , Carlos Schreck , Sergio Giannasi , Guillermo Rosa Diez , Carlos F. Varela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2024.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span><span>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of FENa (Fractional excretion of sodium), FEK (fractional excretion of potassium) and uSID (urinary strong ion difference) in predicting pAKI in </span>sepsis and </span>septic shock.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Two intensive care units in Argentina.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div><span><span>Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock<span> and AKI, and had a </span></span>urinary biochemistry within 24</span> <span>h of the AKI diagnosis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FENa, FEK and uSID through a ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>80 patients were included. 40 patients presented pAKI. pAKI group had higher APACHE, SOFA score<span>, and mortality rate. In the ROC curve analysis, uSID had no diagnostic utility (AUC</span></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.52, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.69). FENa presented moderate accuracy showing an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60−0.83; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), while FEK presented low accuracy with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57−0.80; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). The optimal Youden point for identifying pAKI was at a FENa higher than 0.51 % with a specificity of 72.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%. In the case of FEK, a value higher than 21.9 % presented the best relation, with a specificity of 67.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>urine biochemistry interpretation in septic patients must be revised. FENa and FEK are related to the severity of AKI and could be helpful complementary tools for diagnosing pAKI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724000274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724000274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估FENa(钠的分量排泄)、FEK(钾的分量排泄)和uSID(尿强离子差)在预测脓毒症和脓毒性休克中pAKI方面的诊断性能:设计:回顾性队列研究:患者:确诊为败血症和脓毒性休克的成人患者:患者:确诊为脓毒症或脓毒性休克并出现 AKI 的成人患者,且在确诊 AKI 后 24 小时内进行过尿液生化检查:无:我们通过ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic)曲线分析评估了FENa、FEK和uSID的诊断准确性:共纳入 80 名患者。pAKI组的APACHE、SOFA评分和死亡率均较高。在 ROC 曲线分析中,uSID 没有诊断效用(AUC=0.52,P=0.69)。FENa 的 AUC 为 0.71(95% CI 0.60-0.83;p=0.001),准确度适中;而 FEK 的 AUC 为 0.69(95% CI 0.57-0.80;p=0.04),准确度较低。鉴别 pAKI 的最佳尤登点是 FENa 高于 0.51%,特异性为 72.5%,灵敏度为 65.0%。结论:必须对脓毒症患者的尿液生化解释进行修正。FENa和FEK与AKI的严重程度有关,可作为诊断pAKI的辅助工具。
Fractional excretion of sodium and potassium and urinary strong ion difference in the evaluation of persistent AKI in sepsis
Objective
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of FENa (Fractional excretion of sodium), FEK (fractional excretion of potassium) and uSID (urinary strong ion difference) in predicting pAKI in sepsis and septic shock.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Two intensive care units in Argentina.
Patients
Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock and AKI, and had a urinary biochemistry within 24h of the AKI diagnosis.
Interventions
None.
Main variables of interest
We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FENa, FEK and uSID through a ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis.
Results
80 patients were included. 40 patients presented pAKI. pAKI group had higher APACHE, SOFA score, and mortality rate. In the ROC curve analysis, uSID had no diagnostic utility (AUC = 0.52, p = 0.69). FENa presented moderate accuracy showing an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60−0.83; p = 0.001), while FEK presented low accuracy with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57−0.80; p = 0.04). The optimal Youden point for identifying pAKI was at a FENa higher than 0.51 % with a specificity of 72.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%. In the case of FEK, a value higher than 21.9 % presented the best relation, with a specificity of 67.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%.
Conclusions
urine biochemistry interpretation in septic patients must be revised. FENa and FEK are related to the severity of AKI and could be helpful complementary tools for diagnosing pAKI.