时空综合贝叶斯物种分布模型揭示性状与分布范围变化之间缺乏广泛关系

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1111/geb.13819
Joris H. Wiethase, Philip S. Mostert, Christopher R. Cooney, Robert B. O'Hara, Colin M. Beale
{"title":"时空综合贝叶斯物种分布模型揭示性状与分布范围变化之间缺乏广泛关系","authors":"Joris H. Wiethase,&nbsp;Philip S. Mostert,&nbsp;Christopher R. Cooney,&nbsp;Robert B. O'Hara,&nbsp;Colin M. Beale","doi":"10.1111/geb.13819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Climate change and habitat loss or degradation are some of the greatest threats that species face today, often resulting in range shifts. Species traits have been discussed as important predictors of range shifts, with the identification of general trends being of great interest to conservation efforts. However, studies reviewing relationships between traits and range shifts have questioned the existence of such generalized trends, due to mixed results and weak correlations, as well as analytical shortcomings. The aim of this study was to test this relationship empirically, using analytical approaches that account for common sources of bias when assessing range trends.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Tanzania, East Africa.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time period</h3>\n \n <p>1980–1999 and 2000–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major taxa studied</h3>\n \n <p>57 savannah specialist birds found in Tanzania, belonging to 26 families and 11 orders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We applied recently developed integrated spatio-temporal species distribution models in R-INLA, combining citizen science and bird Atlas data to estimate ranges of species, quantify range shifts, and test the predictive power of traditional trait groups, as well as exposure-related and sensitivity traits. We based our study on 40 years of bird observations in East African savannahs, a biome that has experienced increasing climatic and non-climatic pressures over recent decades. We correlated patterns of change with species traits using linear regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We find indications of relationships identified by previous research, but low average explanatory power of traits from an ecological perspective, confirming the lack of meaningful general associations. However, our analysis finds compelling species-specific results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We highlight the importance of individual assessments while demonstrating the usefulness of our analytical approach for analyses of range shifts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13819","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatio-temporal integrated Bayesian species distribution models reveal lack of broad relationships between traits and range shifts\",\"authors\":\"Joris H. Wiethase,&nbsp;Philip S. Mostert,&nbsp;Christopher R. Cooney,&nbsp;Robert B. O'Hara,&nbsp;Colin M. Beale\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Climate change and habitat loss or degradation are some of the greatest threats that species face today, often resulting in range shifts. Species traits have been discussed as important predictors of range shifts, with the identification of general trends being of great interest to conservation efforts. However, studies reviewing relationships between traits and range shifts have questioned the existence of such generalized trends, due to mixed results and weak correlations, as well as analytical shortcomings. The aim of this study was to test this relationship empirically, using analytical approaches that account for common sources of bias when assessing range trends.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Tanzania, East Africa.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time period</h3>\\n \\n <p>1980–1999 and 2000–2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major taxa studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>57 savannah specialist birds found in Tanzania, belonging to 26 families and 11 orders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We applied recently developed integrated spatio-temporal species distribution models in R-INLA, combining citizen science and bird Atlas data to estimate ranges of species, quantify range shifts, and test the predictive power of traditional trait groups, as well as exposure-related and sensitivity traits. We based our study on 40 years of bird observations in East African savannahs, a biome that has experienced increasing climatic and non-climatic pressures over recent decades. We correlated patterns of change with species traits using linear regression models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We find indications of relationships identified by previous research, but low average explanatory power of traits from an ecological perspective, confirming the lack of meaningful general associations. However, our analysis finds compelling species-specific results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We highlight the importance of individual assessments while demonstrating the usefulness of our analytical approach for analyses of range shifts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13819\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13819\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的气候变化和栖息地丧失或退化是当今物种面临的最大威胁之一,往往会导致物种分布范围的转移。物种特征一直被认为是预测分布区转移的重要因素,确定总体趋势对保护工作具有重大意义。然而,由于结果参差不齐、相关性较弱以及分析方法上的缺陷,审查性状与分布区转移之间关系的研究对这种普遍趋势的存在提出了质疑。研究的主要分类群在坦桑尼亚发现的 57 种热带草原专业鸟类,隶属于 26 个科和 11 个目。方法我们在 R-INLA 中应用最近开发的综合时空物种分布模型,结合公民科学和鸟类图集数据来估计物种的分布范围,量化分布范围的变化,并测试传统性状组以及暴露相关性状和敏感性状的预测能力。我们的研究基于 40 年来对东非热带稀树草原鸟类的观察,近几十年来,这一生物群落经历了越来越大的气候和非气候压力。我们使用线性回归模型将变化模式与物种特征相关联。结果我们发现了以往研究中发现的关系迹象,但从生态学角度来看,特征的平均解释力较低,这证实了缺乏有意义的一般性关联。主要结论我们强调了个体评估的重要性,同时证明了我们的分析方法对分析范围变化的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatio-temporal integrated Bayesian species distribution models reveal lack of broad relationships between traits and range shifts

Aim

Climate change and habitat loss or degradation are some of the greatest threats that species face today, often resulting in range shifts. Species traits have been discussed as important predictors of range shifts, with the identification of general trends being of great interest to conservation efforts. However, studies reviewing relationships between traits and range shifts have questioned the existence of such generalized trends, due to mixed results and weak correlations, as well as analytical shortcomings. The aim of this study was to test this relationship empirically, using analytical approaches that account for common sources of bias when assessing range trends.

Location

Tanzania, East Africa.

Time period

1980–1999 and 2000–2020.

Major taxa studied

57 savannah specialist birds found in Tanzania, belonging to 26 families and 11 orders.

Methods

We applied recently developed integrated spatio-temporal species distribution models in R-INLA, combining citizen science and bird Atlas data to estimate ranges of species, quantify range shifts, and test the predictive power of traditional trait groups, as well as exposure-related and sensitivity traits. We based our study on 40 years of bird observations in East African savannahs, a biome that has experienced increasing climatic and non-climatic pressures over recent decades. We correlated patterns of change with species traits using linear regression models.

Results

We find indications of relationships identified by previous research, but low average explanatory power of traits from an ecological perspective, confirming the lack of meaningful general associations. However, our analysis finds compelling species-specific results.

Main conclusions

We highlight the importance of individual assessments while demonstrating the usefulness of our analytical approach for analyses of range shifts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Fine-Grain Predictions Are Key to Accurately Represent Continental-Scale Biodiversity Patterns Issue Information Thermal Forcing Versus Chilling? Misspecification of Temperature Controls in Spring Phenology Models Predicting Landscape Conversion Impact on Small Mammal Occurrence and the Transmission of Parasites in the Atlantic Forest Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1