重症慢性肾病患者接受万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合疗法的肾毒性风险

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1177/08850666241234577
Tamyah Pipkin, Stuart Pope, Alley Killian, Sarah Green, Benjamin Albrecht, Katherine Nugent
{"title":"重症慢性肾病患者接受万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合疗法的肾毒性风险","authors":"Tamyah Pipkin, Stuart Pope, Alley Killian, Sarah Green, Benjamin Albrecht, Katherine Nugent","doi":"10.1177/08850666241234577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients when compared to similar combinations. Additional studies examining this nephrotoxic risk in critically ill patients have not consistently demonstrated the aforementioned association. Furthermore, patients with baseline renal dysfunction have been excluded from almost all of these studies, creating a need to examine the risk in this patient population. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill adults with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received vancomycin plus an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam at Emory University Hospital. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included stage of AKI, time to development of AKI, time to return to baseline renal function, new requirement for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 109 patients were included. There was no difference observed in the primary outcome between the VPT (50%) and comparator (58%) group (<i>P</i> = .4), stage 2 or 3 AKI (15.9% vs 6%; <i>P</i> = .98), time to AKI development (1.7 vs 2 days; <i>P</i> = .5), time to return to baseline renal function (4 vs 3 days; <i>P</i> = .2), new requirement for RRT (4.5% vs 1.5%; <i>P</i> = .3), ICU length of stay (7.3 vs 7.4 days; <i>P</i> = .9), hospital length of stay (19.3 vs 20.1 days; <i>P</i> = .87), or in-hospital mortality (15.9% vs 10.8%; <i>P</i> = .4). A significant difference was observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure (3.32 vs 2.62 days; <i>P</i> = .045 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> VPT was not associated with an increased risk of AKI or adverse renal outcomes. Our findings suggest that the use of this antibiotic combination should not be avoided in this patient population. More robust prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"860-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nephrotoxic Risk Associated With Combination Therapy of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Tamyah Pipkin, Stuart Pope, Alley Killian, Sarah Green, Benjamin Albrecht, Katherine Nugent\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241234577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients when compared to similar combinations. Additional studies examining this nephrotoxic risk in critically ill patients have not consistently demonstrated the aforementioned association. Furthermore, patients with baseline renal dysfunction have been excluded from almost all of these studies, creating a need to examine the risk in this patient population. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill adults with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received vancomycin plus an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam at Emory University Hospital. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included stage of AKI, time to development of AKI, time to return to baseline renal function, new requirement for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 109 patients were included. There was no difference observed in the primary outcome between the VPT (50%) and comparator (58%) group (<i>P</i> = .4), stage 2 or 3 AKI (15.9% vs 6%; <i>P</i> = .98), time to AKI development (1.7 vs 2 days; <i>P</i> = .5), time to return to baseline renal function (4 vs 3 days; <i>P</i> = .2), new requirement for RRT (4.5% vs 1.5%; <i>P</i> = .3), ICU length of stay (7.3 vs 7.4 days; <i>P</i> = .9), hospital length of stay (19.3 vs 20.1 days; <i>P</i> = .87), or in-hospital mortality (15.9% vs 10.8%; <i>P</i> = .4). A significant difference was observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure (3.32 vs 2.62 days; <i>P</i> = .045 days). <b>Conclusion:</b> VPT was not associated with an increased risk of AKI or adverse renal outcomes. Our findings suggest that the use of this antibiotic combination should not be avoided in this patient population. More robust prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"860-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241234577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241234577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在住院患者中,万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(VPT)的组合与类似组合相比,与急性肾损伤(AKI)有关。针对危重病人肾毒性风险的其他研究并未一致证明上述关联。此外,几乎所有这些研究都排除了基线肾功能不全的患者,因此有必要对这部分患者的风险进行研究。研究方法这是一项回顾性队列分析,研究对象是埃默里大学医院接受万古霉素加抗假丝酵母β-内酰胺治疗的重症成人慢性肾病(CKD)患者。主要结果是AKI的发生率。次要结果包括 AKI 分期、发生 AKI 的时间、恢复基线肾功能的时间、肾脏替代治疗的新需求、重症监护室和住院时间以及院内死亡率。结果:共纳入了 109 名患者。在 VPT 组(50%)和对比组(58%)的主要结果(P = .4)、2 期或 3 期 AKI(15.9% vs 6%;P = .98)、发生 AKI 的时间(1.7 vs 2 天;P = .5)、恢复基线肾功能的时间(4 vs 3 天;P = .2)、新的 RRT 需求(4.5% vs 1.5%;P = .3)、ICU 住院时间(7.3 vs 7.4 天;P = .9)、住院时间(19.3 vs 20.1 天;P = .87)或院内死亡率(15.9% vs 10.8%;P = .4)。在抗生素暴露时间方面也有明显差异(3.32 天 vs 2.62 天;P = .045 天)。结论VPT 与 AKI 或不良肾功能结果风险增加无关。我们的研究结果表明,在这类患者中不应避免使用这种抗生素组合。有必要进行更有力的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nephrotoxic Risk Associated With Combination Therapy of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background: The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients when compared to similar combinations. Additional studies examining this nephrotoxic risk in critically ill patients have not consistently demonstrated the aforementioned association. Furthermore, patients with baseline renal dysfunction have been excluded from almost all of these studies, creating a need to examine the risk in this patient population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill adults with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received vancomycin plus an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam at Emory University Hospital. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Secondary outcomes included stage of AKI, time to development of AKI, time to return to baseline renal function, new requirement for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 109 patients were included. There was no difference observed in the primary outcome between the VPT (50%) and comparator (58%) group (P = .4), stage 2 or 3 AKI (15.9% vs 6%; P = .98), time to AKI development (1.7 vs 2 days; P = .5), time to return to baseline renal function (4 vs 3 days; P = .2), new requirement for RRT (4.5% vs 1.5%; P = .3), ICU length of stay (7.3 vs 7.4 days; P = .9), hospital length of stay (19.3 vs 20.1 days; P = .87), or in-hospital mortality (15.9% vs 10.8%; P = .4). A significant difference was observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure (3.32 vs 2.62 days; P = .045 days). Conclusion: VPT was not associated with an increased risk of AKI or adverse renal outcomes. Our findings suggest that the use of this antibiotic combination should not be avoided in this patient population. More robust prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in non-Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Critically ill Patients: A Multicentre Cohort Study. Spinal Cord Injury Following Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Overlooked and Underreported Complication. Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement in Prone Position. Assessing the Role of Blood Gas Analysis in COVID-19 Patients for Early Warning and Clinical Guidance. Bacterial Superinfections in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1