冠状动脉旁路移植手术中脉动和非脉动心肺旁路技术对脑部灌注的影响。

İpek Bostancı, Beyhan Güner, Evrim Kucur Tülübaş, Güray Demir, Zafer Çukurova
{"title":"冠状动脉旁路移植手术中脉动和非脉动心肺旁路技术对脑部灌注的影响。","authors":"İpek Bostancı, Beyhan Güner, Evrim Kucur Tülübaş, Güray Demir, Zafer Çukurova","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2024.231331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machines used in coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries on cerebral perfusion by performing cerebral oximetry monitoring [near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)], S100-β protein measurements, and neurocognitive function assessment tests using both pulsatile and non-pulsatile modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 44 patients, 22 non-pulsatile (Group NP) and 22 pulsatile (Group P), were included in the study. Hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gas values, NIRS values and blood S100β protein levels were analyzed at five points: pre-induction (T1), initiation of CPB (T2), termination of CPB (T3), end of surgery (T4), and postoperative 24 h (T5). Two different neuropsychological tests were administered to patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index, aortic cross-clamping, CPB, and operation durations. The mean arterial blood pressure and PaO<sub>2</sub> values for the T2 measurements were significantly higher in group NP (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) (NIRS) values at T3 and T4 were significantly higher in group P (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Serum S100β measurement values at T3 and T5 were significantly higher in group NP than in group P (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Serum S100β protein levels at T3 correlate with rSO<sub>2</sub> results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pH, lactate, glucose, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and peripheral oxygen saturation values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no difference between the two groups for neurocognitive function tests, we believe that pulsatile perfusion may be more beneficial for cerebral perfusion when S100β protein and NIRS values are considered. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of the pulsatile technique for cerebral perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"52 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Pulsatile and Non-Pulsatile Cardiopulmonary Bypass Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgeries on Cerebral Perfusion.\",\"authors\":\"İpek Bostancı, Beyhan Güner, Evrim Kucur Tülübaş, Güray Demir, Zafer Çukurova\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2024.231331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machines used in coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries on cerebral perfusion by performing cerebral oximetry monitoring [near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)], S100-β protein measurements, and neurocognitive function assessment tests using both pulsatile and non-pulsatile modes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 44 patients, 22 non-pulsatile (Group NP) and 22 pulsatile (Group P), were included in the study. Hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gas values, NIRS values and blood S100β protein levels were analyzed at five points: pre-induction (T1), initiation of CPB (T2), termination of CPB (T3), end of surgery (T4), and postoperative 24 h (T5). Two different neuropsychological tests were administered to patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index, aortic cross-clamping, CPB, and operation durations. The mean arterial blood pressure and PaO<sub>2</sub> values for the T2 measurements were significantly higher in group NP (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) (NIRS) values at T3 and T4 were significantly higher in group P (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Serum S100β measurement values at T3 and T5 were significantly higher in group NP than in group P (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Serum S100β protein levels at T3 correlate with rSO<sub>2</sub> results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pH, lactate, glucose, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and peripheral oxygen saturation values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no difference between the two groups for neurocognitive function tests, we believe that pulsatile perfusion may be more beneficial for cerebral perfusion when S100β protein and NIRS values are considered. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of the pulsatile technique for cerebral perfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"22-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901049/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.231331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.231331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们旨在通过使用脉动和非脉动模式进行脑氧饱和度监测[近红外光谱(NIRS)]、S100-β 蛋白测量和神经认知功能评估测试,评估冠状动脉旁路移植手术中使用的心肺旁路(CPB)机对脑灌注的影响:本研究共纳入 44 名患者,其中 22 名为非脉动组(NP 组),22 名为脉动组(P 组)。在五个时间点分析了血液动力学参数、动脉血气值、近红外光谱值和血液 S100β 蛋白水平:诱导前(T1)、开始 CPB(T2)、终止 CPB(T3)、手术结束(T4)和术后 24 小时(T5)。在术前和术后对患者进行了两种不同的神经心理学测试:两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、主动脉瓣关闭、CPB 和手术持续时间等人口统计学特征方面无明显差异。NP 组的平均动脉血压和 T2 测量的 PaO2 值明显更高(P < 0.05)。P组T3和T4的区域脑氧饱和度(rSO2)(近红外光谱)值明显更高(P<0.05)。NP 组在 T3 和 T5 的血清 S100β 测量值明显高于 P 组(P < 0.05)。T3时的血清S100β蛋白水平与rSO2结果相关。两组在 pH 值、乳酸、葡萄糖、二氧化碳分压和外周血氧饱和度值方面没有统计学差异:尽管两组在神经认知功能测试方面没有差异,但我们认为,如果考虑到 S100β 蛋白和近红外光谱的值,脉动灌注可能更有利于脑灌注。要评估脉动技术对脑灌注的益处,还需要进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Pulsatile and Non-Pulsatile Cardiopulmonary Bypass Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgeries on Cerebral Perfusion.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machines used in coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries on cerebral perfusion by performing cerebral oximetry monitoring [near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)], S100-β protein measurements, and neurocognitive function assessment tests using both pulsatile and non-pulsatile modes.

Methods: A total of 44 patients, 22 non-pulsatile (Group NP) and 22 pulsatile (Group P), were included in the study. Hemodynamic parameters, arterial blood gas values, NIRS values and blood S100β protein levels were analyzed at five points: pre-induction (T1), initiation of CPB (T2), termination of CPB (T3), end of surgery (T4), and postoperative 24 h (T5). Two different neuropsychological tests were administered to patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for demographic characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index, aortic cross-clamping, CPB, and operation durations. The mean arterial blood pressure and PaO2 values for the T2 measurements were significantly higher in group NP (P < 0.05). Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) (NIRS) values at T3 and T4 were significantly higher in group P (P < 0.05). Serum S100β measurement values at T3 and T5 were significantly higher in group NP than in group P (P < 0.05). Serum S100β protein levels at T3 correlate with rSO2 results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pH, lactate, glucose, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and peripheral oxygen saturation values.

Conclusion: Despite no difference between the two groups for neurocognitive function tests, we believe that pulsatile perfusion may be more beneficial for cerebral perfusion when S100β protein and NIRS values are considered. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of the pulsatile technique for cerebral perfusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Anaesthesia Management of A Patient with Airway Obstruction Caused by Prosthetic Vascular Graft Invasion into the Tracheal Lumen. Bispectral Index Guidance Reduced Target Plasma Propofol Concentration During ERCP in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl in Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring Using A Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Regimen in Spine Surgeries. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1