Alejandro González-Castro , Alberto Medina Villanueva , Patricia Escudero-Acha , Aurio Fajardo Campoverdi , Federico Gordo Vidal , Ignacio Martin-Loeches , Angelo Roncalli Rocha , Marta Costa Romero , Marianela Hernández López , Carlos Ferrando , Alessandro Protti , Vicent Modesto i Alapont , Mechanical Power Day Group
{"title":"控制机械通气中机械功率的综合研究:机械功率升高的普遍性和成分分析","authors":"Alejandro González-Castro , Alberto Medina Villanueva , Patricia Escudero-Acha , Aurio Fajardo Campoverdi , Federico Gordo Vidal , Ignacio Martin-Loeches , Angelo Roncalli Rocha , Marta Costa Romero , Marianela Hernández López , Carlos Ferrando , Alessandro Protti , Vicent Modesto i Alapont , Mechanical Power Day Group","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the prevalence of elevated mechanical power (MP) values (>17<!--> <!-->J/min) used in routine clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, analytical, multicenter, international study conducted on November 21, 2019, from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. <span>NCT03936231</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>One hundred thirty-three Critical Care Units.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for any cause.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Mechanical power.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A population of 372 patients was analyzed. PM was significantly higher in patients under pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VC) (19.20<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.44<!--> <!-->J/min vs. 16.01<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.88<!--> <!-->J/min; <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), but the percentage of patients with PM<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->17<!--> <!-->J/min was not different (41% vs. 35%, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.382). The best models according to AICcw expressing PM for patients in VC are described as follows: Surrogate Strain (Driving Pressure) + PEEP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Surrogate Strain Rate (PEEP/Flow Ratio) + Respiratory Rate. For patients in PC, it is defined as: Surrogate Strain (Expiratory Tidal Volume/PEEP) + PEEP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Surrogate Strain Rate (Surrogate Strain/Ti) + Respiratory Rate<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Expiratory Tidal Volume<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Ti.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated patients may be at risk of experiencing elevated levels of mechanical power. Despite observed differences in mechanical power values between VC and PC ventilation, they did not result in a significant disparity in the prevalence of high mechanical power values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"48 3","pages":"Pages 155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive study of mechanical power in controlled mechanical ventilation: Prevalence of elevated mechanical power and component analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro González-Castro , Alberto Medina Villanueva , Patricia Escudero-Acha , Aurio Fajardo Campoverdi , Federico Gordo Vidal , Ignacio Martin-Loeches , Angelo Roncalli Rocha , Marta Costa Romero , Marianela Hernández López , Carlos Ferrando , Alessandro Protti , Vicent Modesto i Alapont , Mechanical Power Day Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medin.2023.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the prevalence of elevated mechanical power (MP) values (>17<!--> <!-->J/min) used in routine clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, analytical, multicenter, international study conducted on November 21, 2019, from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. <span>NCT03936231</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>One hundred thirty-three Critical Care Units.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for any cause.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Mechanical power.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A population of 372 patients was analyzed. PM was significantly higher in patients under pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VC) (19.20<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.44<!--> <!-->J/min vs. 16.01<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.88<!--> <!-->J/min; <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), but the percentage of patients with PM<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->17<!--> <!-->J/min was not different (41% vs. 35%, respectively; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.382). The best models according to AICcw expressing PM for patients in VC are described as follows: Surrogate Strain (Driving Pressure) + PEEP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Surrogate Strain Rate (PEEP/Flow Ratio) + Respiratory Rate. For patients in PC, it is defined as: Surrogate Strain (Expiratory Tidal Volume/PEEP) + PEEP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Surrogate Strain Rate (Surrogate Strain/Ti) + Respiratory Rate<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Expiratory Tidal Volume<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Ti.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated patients may be at risk of experiencing elevated levels of mechanical power. Despite observed differences in mechanical power values between VC and PC ventilation, they did not result in a significant disparity in the prevalence of high mechanical power values.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 155-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569123003054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569123003054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定常规临床实践中使用的机械功率(MP)值升高(>17 J/min)的普遍性.设计观察性、描述性、横断面、分析性、多中心、国际研究于2019年11月21日上午8:00至下午3:00进行.NCT03936231.Setting133个重症监护病房.Patients因任何原因接受有创机械通气的患者.Interventions无.Mechanical power.Results分析了372名患者。与容量控制通气(VC)相比,压力控制通气(PC)患者的 PM 明显更高(19.20 ± 8.44 J/min vs. 16.01 ± 6.88 J/min;p < 0.001),但 PM 为 17 J/min 的患者比例没有差异(分别为 41% vs. 35%;p = 0.382)。根据 AICcw,表达 VC 患者 PM 的最佳模型如下:替代应变(驱动压力)+ PEEP + 替代应变率(PEEP/流量比)+ 呼吸频率。对于 PC 患者,其定义如下结论相当一部分机械通气患者可能面临机械功率水平升高的风险。尽管观察到 VC 通气和 PC 通气的机械力值存在差异,但并没有导致机械力值偏高的显著差异。
Comprehensive study of mechanical power in controlled mechanical ventilation: Prevalence of elevated mechanical power and component analysis
Objective
To determine the prevalence of elevated mechanical power (MP) values (>17 J/min) used in routine clinical practice.
Design
Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, analytical, multicenter, international study conducted on November 21, 2019, from 8:00 AM to 3:00 PM. NCT03936231.
Setting
One hundred thirty-three Critical Care Units.
Patients
Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for any cause.
Interventions
None.
Main variables of interest
Mechanical power.
Results
A population of 372 patients was analyzed. PM was significantly higher in patients under pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VC) (19.20 ± 8.44 J/min vs. 16.01 ± 6.88 J/min; p < 0.001), but the percentage of patients with PM > 17 J/min was not different (41% vs. 35%, respectively; p = 0.382). The best models according to AICcw expressing PM for patients in VC are described as follows: Surrogate Strain (Driving Pressure) + PEEP + Surrogate Strain Rate (PEEP/Flow Ratio) + Respiratory Rate. For patients in PC, it is defined as: Surrogate Strain (Expiratory Tidal Volume/PEEP) + PEEP + Surrogate Strain Rate (Surrogate Strain/Ti) + Respiratory Rate + Expiratory Tidal Volume + Ti.
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated patients may be at risk of experiencing elevated levels of mechanical power. Despite observed differences in mechanical power values between VC and PC ventilation, they did not result in a significant disparity in the prevalence of high mechanical power values.
期刊介绍:
Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).