通过网络 DEA 交叉效率法研究集装箱码头的效率

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101107
Lingyue Li , Jing Liu , Jing Yang , Xiaozhi Ma , Hongping Yuan
{"title":"通过网络 DEA 交叉效率法研究集装箱码头的效率","authors":"Lingyue Li ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaozhi Ma ,&nbsp;Hongping Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the quest to combat climate change and facilitate sustainable development, improving efficiency is a common and successful method for container terminals. Under such a circumstance, it is critical to accurately estimate the efficiency level of container terminals, so that making more reasonable decision-making. However, many present studies consider container terminal operations as a “black box”, reliance mostly on their own self-efficiency evaluations, ignoring some important external environmental factors, which can lead to inaccurate results that are hard to compare. To rectify this situation, this paper proposes a new network DEA cross-efficiency model that considers initial structure and GHG emissions of container terminal, co-opetition (competition and cooperation) and “peer-evaluation” between container terminals, which enables us to attain more accurate and comparable evaluations. Having applied this model to 25 Chinese container terminals in 2019 to analyze their three efficiencies (production operation, profit transformation, and all-in). Then, the effects of different factors on three efficiencies are analyzed by Tobit regression, and a series of efficiency improvement recommendations are proposed. Our findings revealed that while the production operation at these terminals was efficient (with average performance rate of 0.65), both profit transformation and overall efficiency were quite inefficient (averaging 0.23 and 0.35 respectively). Factors such as price for services, quality of services, technology used, and regional economic development level have significant positive effects on overall efficiency. Investment size had a significant negative effect on overall efficiency. Through our research, we have provided vital support for accurately evaluating efficiency in container terminals as well as useful guidance when designing strategies for greater efficiency improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the efficiency of container terminals through a network DEA cross efficiency approach\",\"authors\":\"Lingyue Li ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaozhi Ma ,&nbsp;Hongping Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the quest to combat climate change and facilitate sustainable development, improving efficiency is a common and successful method for container terminals. Under such a circumstance, it is critical to accurately estimate the efficiency level of container terminals, so that making more reasonable decision-making. However, many present studies consider container terminal operations as a “black box”, reliance mostly on their own self-efficiency evaluations, ignoring some important external environmental factors, which can lead to inaccurate results that are hard to compare. To rectify this situation, this paper proposes a new network DEA cross-efficiency model that considers initial structure and GHG emissions of container terminal, co-opetition (competition and cooperation) and “peer-evaluation” between container terminals, which enables us to attain more accurate and comparable evaluations. Having applied this model to 25 Chinese container terminals in 2019 to analyze their three efficiencies (production operation, profit transformation, and all-in). Then, the effects of different factors on three efficiencies are analyzed by Tobit regression, and a series of efficiency improvement recommendations are proposed. Our findings revealed that while the production operation at these terminals was efficient (with average performance rate of 0.65), both profit transformation and overall efficiency were quite inefficient (averaging 0.23 and 0.35 respectively). Factors such as price for services, quality of services, technology used, and regional economic development level have significant positive effects on overall efficiency. Investment size had a significant negative effect on overall efficiency. Through our research, we have provided vital support for accurately evaluating efficiency in container terminals as well as useful guidance when designing strategies for greater efficiency improvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在应对气候变化和促进可持续发展的过程中,提高效率是集装箱码头常用的成功方法。在这种情况下,准确估算集装箱码头的效率水平,从而做出更合理的决策至关重要。然而,目前的许多研究将集装箱码头的运营视为一个 "黑箱",主要依靠自身的效率评价,忽略了一些重要的外部环境因素,从而导致结果不准确,难以比较。为了改变这种状况,本文提出了一种新的网络 DEA 交叉效率模型,该模型考虑了集装箱码头的初始结构和温室气体排放、集装箱码头之间的合作竞争(竞争与合作)和 "同行评价",从而使我们能够获得更准确和可比较的评价。将该模型应用于 2019 年的 25 个中国集装箱码头,分析其三个效率(生产运营效率、利润转化效率和全员效率)。然后,通过Tobit回归分析了不同因素对三个效率的影响,并提出了一系列效率改进建议。研究结果表明,虽然这些码头的生产运营效率较高(平均绩效率为 0.65),但利润转化效率和综合效率都相当低(平均绩效率分别为 0.23 和 0.35)。服务价格、服务质量、使用的技术和地区经济发展水平等因素对总体效率有显著的正向影响。投资规模对总体效率有明显的负面影响。通过研究,我们为准确评估集装箱码头的效率提供了重要支持,也为设计提高效率的策略提供了有益指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the efficiency of container terminals through a network DEA cross efficiency approach

In the quest to combat climate change and facilitate sustainable development, improving efficiency is a common and successful method for container terminals. Under such a circumstance, it is critical to accurately estimate the efficiency level of container terminals, so that making more reasonable decision-making. However, many present studies consider container terminal operations as a “black box”, reliance mostly on their own self-efficiency evaluations, ignoring some important external environmental factors, which can lead to inaccurate results that are hard to compare. To rectify this situation, this paper proposes a new network DEA cross-efficiency model that considers initial structure and GHG emissions of container terminal, co-opetition (competition and cooperation) and “peer-evaluation” between container terminals, which enables us to attain more accurate and comparable evaluations. Having applied this model to 25 Chinese container terminals in 2019 to analyze their three efficiencies (production operation, profit transformation, and all-in). Then, the effects of different factors on three efficiencies are analyzed by Tobit regression, and a series of efficiency improvement recommendations are proposed. Our findings revealed that while the production operation at these terminals was efficient (with average performance rate of 0.65), both profit transformation and overall efficiency were quite inefficient (averaging 0.23 and 0.35 respectively). Factors such as price for services, quality of services, technology used, and regional economic development level have significant positive effects on overall efficiency. Investment size had a significant negative effect on overall efficiency. Through our research, we have provided vital support for accurately evaluating efficiency in container terminals as well as useful guidance when designing strategies for greater efficiency improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting public support for the development of urban consolidation center: The case of hanoi city, Vietnam Subway systems and tourism: An overview and implications Using coopetition to increase asset utilization and market coverage of dry ports Social acceptability of shared autonomous vehicles. From avoiders to innovators in Hannover (Germany) A multiscale walkability assessment approach creating walkable streets: A case study of high-density city, Macau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1