Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli
{"title":"LIBET-Q基于过程的组成部分的验证:案例概念化的创新工具","authors":"Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli","doi":"10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.</p>","PeriodicalId":501324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization\",\"authors\":\"Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization
Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.