视网膜专家和基于大型语言模型的人工智能平台对糖尿病黄斑水肿管理的建议。

Ayushi Choudhary, Nikhil Gopalakrishnan, Aishwarya Joshi, Divya Balakrishnan, Jay Chhablani, Naresh Kumar Yadav, Nikitha Gurram Reddy, Padmaja Kumari Rani, Priyanka Gandhi, Rohit Shetty, Rupak Roy, Snehal Bavaskar, Vishma Prabhu, Ramesh Venkatesh
{"title":"视网膜专家和基于大型语言模型的人工智能平台对糖尿病黄斑水肿管理的建议。","authors":"Ayushi Choudhary, Nikhil Gopalakrishnan, Aishwarya Joshi, Divya Balakrishnan, Jay Chhablani, Naresh Kumar Yadav, Nikitha Gurram Reddy, Padmaja Kumari Rani, Priyanka Gandhi, Rohit Shetty, Rupak Roy, Snehal Bavaskar, Vishma Prabhu, Ramesh Venkatesh","doi":"10.1186/s40942-024-00544-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing diabetic macular edema (DME) management recommendations by creating and comparing responses to clinicians in hypothetical AI-generated case scenarios. The study also examined whether its joint recommendations followed national DME management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AI hypothetically generated 50 ocular case scenarios from 25 patients using keywords like age, gender, type, duration and control of diabetes, visual acuity, lens status, retinopathy stage, coexisting ocular and systemic co-morbidities, and DME-related retinal imaging findings. For DME and ocular co-morbidity management, we calculated inter-rater agreements (kappa analysis) separately for clinician responses, AI-platforms, and the \"majority clinician response\" (the maximum number of identical clinician responses) and \"majority AI-platform\" (the maximum number of identical AI responses). Treatment recommendations for various situations were compared to the Indian national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For DME management, clinicians (ĸ=0.6), AI platforms (ĸ=0.58), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.69) had moderate to substantial inter-rate agreement. The study showed fair to substantial agreement for ocular co-morbidity management between clinicians (ĸ=0.8), AI platforms (ĸ=0.36), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.49). Many of the current study's recommendations and national clinical guidelines agreed and disagreed. When treating center-involving DME with very good visual acuity, lattice degeneration, renal disease, anaemia, and a recent history of cardiovascular disease, there were clear disagreements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, this study recommends DME management using large language model-based generative AI. The study's findings could guide in revising the global DME management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for diabetic macular edema management by retina specialists and large language model-based artificial intelligence platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Ayushi Choudhary, Nikhil Gopalakrishnan, Aishwarya Joshi, Divya Balakrishnan, Jay Chhablani, Naresh Kumar Yadav, Nikitha Gurram Reddy, Padmaja Kumari Rani, Priyanka Gandhi, Rohit Shetty, Rupak Roy, Snehal Bavaskar, Vishma Prabhu, Ramesh Venkatesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40942-024-00544-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing diabetic macular edema (DME) management recommendations by creating and comparing responses to clinicians in hypothetical AI-generated case scenarios. The study also examined whether its joint recommendations followed national DME management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AI hypothetically generated 50 ocular case scenarios from 25 patients using keywords like age, gender, type, duration and control of diabetes, visual acuity, lens status, retinopathy stage, coexisting ocular and systemic co-morbidities, and DME-related retinal imaging findings. For DME and ocular co-morbidity management, we calculated inter-rater agreements (kappa analysis) separately for clinician responses, AI-platforms, and the \\\"majority clinician response\\\" (the maximum number of identical clinician responses) and \\\"majority AI-platform\\\" (the maximum number of identical AI responses). Treatment recommendations for various situations were compared to the Indian national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For DME management, clinicians (ĸ=0.6), AI platforms (ĸ=0.58), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.69) had moderate to substantial inter-rate agreement. The study showed fair to substantial agreement for ocular co-morbidity management between clinicians (ĸ=0.8), AI platforms (ĸ=0.36), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.49). Many of the current study's recommendations and national clinical guidelines agreed and disagreed. When treating center-involving DME with very good visual acuity, lattice degeneration, renal disease, anaemia, and a recent history of cardiovascular disease, there were clear disagreements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, this study recommends DME management using large language model-based generative AI. The study's findings could guide in revising the global DME management guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00544-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00544-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究人工智能(AI)在制定糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)管理建议中的作用,方法是创建并比较人工智能生成的假设病例场景中临床医生的反应。该研究还考察了其联合建议是否遵循了国家糖尿病黄斑水肿管理指南:方法:人工智能使用年龄、性别、类型、糖尿病持续时间和控制情况、视力、晶状体状态、视网膜病变阶段、并存的眼部和全身合并疾病以及与 DME 相关的视网膜成像结果等关键词,假设生成了 25 名患者的 50 个眼部病例。对于 DME 和眼部并发症的治疗,我们分别计算了临床医生回答、人工智能平台、"多数临床医生回答"(相同临床医生回答的最大数量)和 "多数人工智能平台"(相同人工智能回答的最大数量)的评分者之间的一致性(卡帕分析)。将各种情况下的治疗建议与印度国家指南进行了比较:结果:在黑眼圈治疗方面,临床医生(ĸ=0.6)、人工智能平台(ĸ=0.58)、"大多数临床医生回复 "和 "大多数人工智能回复"(ĸ=0.69)之间的比率一致程度为中等至相当高。该研究显示,临床医生(ĸ=0.8)、人工智能平台(ĸ=0.36)以及 "大多数临床医生响应 "和 "大多数人工智能响应"(ĸ=0.49)之间在眼部并发症管理方面的一致程度为一般到相当高。本次研究的许多建议与国家临床指南一致,也有不一致的地方。在治疗视力非常好、晶状体变性、肾病、贫血和近期有心血管疾病史的中心性 DME 时,存在明显分歧:本研究首次建议使用基于大型语言模型的生成式人工智能来管理黑眼圈。结论:本研究首次利用基于大语言模型的生成式人工智能对黑眼圈管理提出建议,研究结果可为修订全球黑眼圈管理指南提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for diabetic macular edema management by retina specialists and large language model-based artificial intelligence platforms.

Purpose: To study the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing diabetic macular edema (DME) management recommendations by creating and comparing responses to clinicians in hypothetical AI-generated case scenarios. The study also examined whether its joint recommendations followed national DME management guidelines.

Methods: The AI hypothetically generated 50 ocular case scenarios from 25 patients using keywords like age, gender, type, duration and control of diabetes, visual acuity, lens status, retinopathy stage, coexisting ocular and systemic co-morbidities, and DME-related retinal imaging findings. For DME and ocular co-morbidity management, we calculated inter-rater agreements (kappa analysis) separately for clinician responses, AI-platforms, and the "majority clinician response" (the maximum number of identical clinician responses) and "majority AI-platform" (the maximum number of identical AI responses). Treatment recommendations for various situations were compared to the Indian national guidelines.

Results: For DME management, clinicians (ĸ=0.6), AI platforms (ĸ=0.58), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.69) had moderate to substantial inter-rate agreement. The study showed fair to substantial agreement for ocular co-morbidity management between clinicians (ĸ=0.8), AI platforms (ĸ=0.36), and the 'majority clinician response' and 'majority AI response' (ĸ=0.49). Many of the current study's recommendations and national clinical guidelines agreed and disagreed. When treating center-involving DME with very good visual acuity, lattice degeneration, renal disease, anaemia, and a recent history of cardiovascular disease, there were clear disagreements.

Conclusion: For the first time, this study recommends DME management using large language model-based generative AI. The study's findings could guide in revising the global DME management guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
期刊最新文献
Blue light reflectance imaging in non-perfusion areas detection: insights from multimodal analysis. Diabetic macular edema (DME): dissecting pathogenesis, prognostication, diagnostic modalities along with current and futuristic therapeutic insights. Safety and efficacy of human amniotic membrane plug transplantation in cases of macular hole. A scoping review. Comparison of conventional internal limiting membrane versus pars plana vitrectomy without peeling for small idiopathic macular hole. The lack of floater perception in eyes with asteroid hyalosis and its direct implications on laser vitreolysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1