手动轮椅使用者护理人员的轮椅技能培训:自学与远程培训的随机对照试验比较。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272
Ronald Lee Kirby, Cher Smith, Matthew David Miller, Dee Osmond, Madeline Anne Sherman, Kim Parker, Prosper Senyo Koto, Christopher John Theriault, Navjot Sandila
{"title":"手动轮椅使用者护理人员的轮椅技能培训:自学与远程培训的随机对照试验比较。","authors":"Ronald Lee Kirby, Cher Smith, Matthew David Miller, Dee Osmond, Madeline Anne Sherman, Kim Parker, Prosper Senyo Koto, Christopher John Theriault, Navjot Sandila","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we tested the hypotheses that, in comparison with control participants receiving only self-study materials (SS group), caregivers of manual wheelchair users who additionally receive remote training (RT group) have greater total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) performance and confidence scores post-training and at follow-up; and that self-study and remote training each individually lead to such gains. We studied 23 dyads of wheelchair users and their caregivers. Caregivers in the SS group received a handbook and videorecording. Those in the RT group also received up to four real-time (\"synchronous\") sessions remotely. The WST-Q 5.1 was administered pre-training (T1), post-training (T2), and after a 3-month follow-up (T3). The mean total WST-Q scores of both groups rose slightly at each new assessment. For the T2-T1 and T3-T1 gains, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either WST-Q performance or WST-Q confidence. For performance, the T2-T1 gain was statistically significant for the RT group and the T3-T2 gain was statistically significant for the SS group. For both groups, the T3-T1 gains in performance were statistically significant with gains of 12.9% and 18.5% relative to baseline for the SS and RT groups. For confidence, only the T3-T1 gain for the SS group was statistically significant with a gain of 4.5% relative to baseline. Although less than the gains previously reported for in-person training, modest but important gains in total WST-Q performance scores can be achieved by self-study, with or without remote training.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT03856749.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2896-2903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wheelchair skills training for caregivers of manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial comparing self-study and remote training.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Lee Kirby, Cher Smith, Matthew David Miller, Dee Osmond, Madeline Anne Sherman, Kim Parker, Prosper Senyo Koto, Christopher John Theriault, Navjot Sandila\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we tested the hypotheses that, in comparison with control participants receiving only self-study materials (SS group), caregivers of manual wheelchair users who additionally receive remote training (RT group) have greater total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) performance and confidence scores post-training and at follow-up; and that self-study and remote training each individually lead to such gains. We studied 23 dyads of wheelchair users and their caregivers. Caregivers in the SS group received a handbook and videorecording. Those in the RT group also received up to four real-time (\\\"synchronous\\\") sessions remotely. The WST-Q 5.1 was administered pre-training (T1), post-training (T2), and after a 3-month follow-up (T3). The mean total WST-Q scores of both groups rose slightly at each new assessment. For the T2-T1 and T3-T1 gains, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either WST-Q performance or WST-Q confidence. For performance, the T2-T1 gain was statistically significant for the RT group and the T3-T2 gain was statistically significant for the SS group. For both groups, the T3-T1 gains in performance were statistically significant with gains of 12.9% and 18.5% relative to baseline for the SS and RT groups. For confidence, only the T3-T1 gain for the SS group was statistically significant with a gain of 4.5% relative to baseline. Although less than the gains previously reported for in-person training, modest but important gains in total WST-Q performance scores can be achieved by self-study, with or without remote training.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT03856749.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2896-2903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2321272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项单盲随机对照试验中,我们测试了以下假设:与只接受自学教材的对照组参与者(SS 组)相比,手动轮椅使用者的照顾者在额外接受远程培训后(RT 组),其轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)的总成绩和自信心得分在培训后和随访时都会更高;自学和远程培训各自都会带来这种提高。我们对 23 对轮椅使用者及其护理人员进行了研究。SS组的护理人员收到了一份手册和视频录像。RT 组的护理人员还接受了多达四次的实时("同步")远程培训。分别在培训前(T1)、培训后(T2)和 3 个月随访后(T3)进行了 WST-Q 5.1 测试。在每次新的评估中,两组的 WST-Q 平均总分都略有上升。在 T2-T1 和 T3-T1 阶段,两组的 WST-Q 成绩和 WST-Q 信心均无显著差异。在成绩方面,RT 组的 T2-T1 增益在统计学上具有显著性,SS 组的 T3-T2 增益在统计学上具有显著性。对于两组来说,T3-T1 的成绩提高都有显著的统计学意义,相对于基线,SS 组和 RT 组分别提高了 12.9% 和 18.5%。在信心方面,只有 SS 组的 T3-T1 增益具有统计学意义,相对于基线增益 4.5%。虽然收益低于之前报道的面对面培训的收益,但通过自学,无论是否有远程培训,都能在WST-Q总成绩上取得适度但重要的收益:注册号:NCT03856749。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wheelchair skills training for caregivers of manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial comparing self-study and remote training.

In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we tested the hypotheses that, in comparison with control participants receiving only self-study materials (SS group), caregivers of manual wheelchair users who additionally receive remote training (RT group) have greater total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) performance and confidence scores post-training and at follow-up; and that self-study and remote training each individually lead to such gains. We studied 23 dyads of wheelchair users and their caregivers. Caregivers in the SS group received a handbook and videorecording. Those in the RT group also received up to four real-time ("synchronous") sessions remotely. The WST-Q 5.1 was administered pre-training (T1), post-training (T2), and after a 3-month follow-up (T3). The mean total WST-Q scores of both groups rose slightly at each new assessment. For the T2-T1 and T3-T1 gains, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either WST-Q performance or WST-Q confidence. For performance, the T2-T1 gain was statistically significant for the RT group and the T3-T2 gain was statistically significant for the SS group. For both groups, the T3-T1 gains in performance were statistically significant with gains of 12.9% and 18.5% relative to baseline for the SS and RT groups. For confidence, only the T3-T1 gain for the SS group was statistically significant with a gain of 4.5% relative to baseline. Although less than the gains previously reported for in-person training, modest but important gains in total WST-Q performance scores can be achieved by self-study, with or without remote training.

Registration number: NCT03856749.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
How do environmental control systems affect mental health and psychological well-being? A pilot study. Educational technology and cognitive diversity: exploring attitudinal responses of autistic students. Assistive device prescriptions in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study of disability distribution. Design and development of a dual-power stroke lever-propelled wheelchair in limited resource setting: a pilot user evaluation. Online survey of wheelchair service providers' opinions about the usefulness of a new rear anti-tip device for manual wheelchairs: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1