Laura Andrea González-Pérez, Freddy Andrés Barrios Arroyave
{"title":"[反复自愿终止妊娠。流行率研究及相关因素探讨。2015-2021年,哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚]。","authors":"Laura Andrea González-Pérez, Freddy Andrés Barrios Arroyave","doi":"10.18597/rcog.4018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the prevalence of recurrent voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) and to explore associated factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Descriptive, cross-sectional cohort study which included women seen between 2015 and 2021 in five sites of an institution located in the Department of Antioquia which promotes sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in Colombia. Measured variables included sociodemographics, SRH, recurrent performance of VTP, type of procedure used in the first VTP and contraception method selected afterwards. The prevalence of global and yearly recurrent abortion period is presented. Associated factors were explored using a multivariate analysis. The research committee of the institution approved the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20,423 women were included. The prevalence of recurrent VTP was 4.07% (n = 831) during the entire period, ranging between 2.3 and 6% over the 7 years. The most commonly used method for recurrent VTP was pharmacological induction (48.50%). After the first VTP, 69.81% of women used contraceptive methods classified as “very effective” according to the World Health Organization. The risk factors identified as being associated with recurrent VTP included being part of the state-subsidized health insurance system (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.35; 95 % CI:1.05-1.72) and having had two or more pregnancies (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.44). Protective factors were identified and included out-of-pocket payment for VTP service (aOR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61-0.82), a history of late VTP (aOR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.81), and the selection of a subdermal implant for contraception following the first abortion (sOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49 – 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible that the prevalence of recurrent VTP is increasing. Prospective studies are required in order to determine whether there is a growing trend and to verify potential association hypotheses derived from this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":101422,"journal":{"name":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","volume":"74 4","pages":"276-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent voluntary termination of pregnancy. Prevalence study and exploration of associated factors. Antioquia, Colombia, 2015 – 2021\",\"authors\":\"Laura Andrea González-Pérez, Freddy Andrés Barrios Arroyave\",\"doi\":\"10.18597/rcog.4018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the prevalence of recurrent voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) and to explore associated factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Descriptive, cross-sectional cohort study which included women seen between 2015 and 2021 in five sites of an institution located in the Department of Antioquia which promotes sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in Colombia. Measured variables included sociodemographics, SRH, recurrent performance of VTP, type of procedure used in the first VTP and contraception method selected afterwards. The prevalence of global and yearly recurrent abortion period is presented. Associated factors were explored using a multivariate analysis. The research committee of the institution approved the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20,423 women were included. The prevalence of recurrent VTP was 4.07% (n = 831) during the entire period, ranging between 2.3 and 6% over the 7 years. The most commonly used method for recurrent VTP was pharmacological induction (48.50%). After the first VTP, 69.81% of women used contraceptive methods classified as “very effective” according to the World Health Organization. The risk factors identified as being associated with recurrent VTP included being part of the state-subsidized health insurance system (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.35; 95 % CI:1.05-1.72) and having had two or more pregnancies (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.44). Protective factors were identified and included out-of-pocket payment for VTP service (aOR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61-0.82), a history of late VTP (aOR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.81), and the selection of a subdermal implant for contraception following the first abortion (sOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49 – 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible that the prevalence of recurrent VTP is increasing. Prospective studies are required in order to determine whether there is a growing trend and to verify potential association hypotheses derived from this work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"276-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述反复自愿终止妊娠(VTP)的发生率,并探讨与之相关的因素。材料与方法:描述性横断面研究,包括 2015 年至 2021 年期间在安蒂奥基亚省五个地点接受治疗的妇女,该地点位于哥伦比亚一家促进性与生殖保健(SRH)的机构内。研究测量了社会人口学和性与生殖健康变量,以及复发性流产的表现、首次流产时使用的手术类型和首次流产后选择的避孕方法。本报告介绍了复发性流产的总体流行率和各年的流行率。使用多变量分析探讨了相关因素。结果:共纳入 20423 名妇女。在整个研究期间,复发性 VTP 的发生率为 4.07%(n = 831),6 年间的发生率从 2.3% 到 6% 不等。复发性流产最常用的方法是药物引产(48.50%)。首次流产后,69.81%的妇女使用了世界卫生组织列为 "非常有效 "的避孕方法。复发性流产的风险因素包括:是否属于国家补贴保险计划(调整后的几率比(ORa)= 1.35,95% CI 1.05-1.72)以及是否有过两次或两次以上怀孕经历(ORa = 1.23,95% CI 1.06-1.44)。以下因素被认为是保护性因素:自费流产(ORa = 0.71,95 % CI 0.61-0.82)、晚期流产史(ORa = 0.30,95 % CI 0.11-0.81)、首次流产后选择皮下植入(ORa = 0.64,95 % CI 0.49-0.83)。需要进行前瞻性研究,以评估是否存在增长趋势,并验证这项工作中可能出现的关联假设。
Recurrent voluntary termination of pregnancy. Prevalence study and exploration of associated factors. Antioquia, Colombia, 2015 – 2021
Objectives: To describe the prevalence of recurrent voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) and to explore associated factors.
Materials and methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional cohort study which included women seen between 2015 and 2021 in five sites of an institution located in the Department of Antioquia which promotes sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in Colombia. Measured variables included sociodemographics, SRH, recurrent performance of VTP, type of procedure used in the first VTP and contraception method selected afterwards. The prevalence of global and yearly recurrent abortion period is presented. Associated factors were explored using a multivariate analysis. The research committee of the institution approved the study.
Results: In total, 20,423 women were included. The prevalence of recurrent VTP was 4.07% (n = 831) during the entire period, ranging between 2.3 and 6% over the 7 years. The most commonly used method for recurrent VTP was pharmacological induction (48.50%). After the first VTP, 69.81% of women used contraceptive methods classified as “very effective” according to the World Health Organization. The risk factors identified as being associated with recurrent VTP included being part of the state-subsidized health insurance system (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.35; 95 % CI:1.05-1.72) and having had two or more pregnancies (aOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.44). Protective factors were identified and included out-of-pocket payment for VTP service (aOR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61-0.82), a history of late VTP (aOR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11-0.81), and the selection of a subdermal implant for contraception following the first abortion (sOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49 – 0.83).
Conclusions: It is possible that the prevalence of recurrent VTP is increasing. Prospective studies are required in order to determine whether there is a growing trend and to verify potential association hypotheses derived from this work.