冬季覆盖种植改善俄勒冈州中部半干旱灌溉种植系统的土壤健康状况

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20481
Clare S. Sullivan, Markus Kleber
{"title":"冬季覆盖种植改善俄勒冈州中部半干旱灌溉种植系统的土壤健康状况","authors":"Clare S. Sullivan,&nbsp;Markus Kleber","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A 1-year experiment was conducted in Madras, OR, to examine the ability of winter cover crops (CCs) to improve physical, chemical, and biological soil properties over a bare fallow control. Competition for water is frequently seen as an obstacle to cover cropping in semiarid, irrigated systems. Benefits from CCs need to be demonstrated and quantified in regions such as Central Oregon's high desert for growers to make cost/benefit analysis decisions. To support such decisions, the effect of eight winter CC treatments (two brassicas, four legumes, two cereal mixtures) on five agronomic parameters and 39 soil health indicators (0–5 cm) were measured in the spring of 2019 after 8 months of CC growth. We identified four soil indicator response patterns in reference to the fallow: (i) steady improvement over fallow across all CCs (16 indicators, with hairy vetch and turnip being most efficient); (ii) marked improvement over fallow but somewhat constant response among CCs (organic C and N, surface hardness); (iii) negligible change from fallow; and (iv) varied response to CCs including both a deterioration and an improvement of soil health. Overall, 13 soil health indicators and five agronomic parameters responded significantly to CC treatment. CCs generated a stronger response of soil chemical and biological parameters than physical (average 82%, 79%, and 18% improvement over fallow, respectively). Hairy vetch had the greatest positive impact on soil biological and chemical properties but the lowest average impact on physical indicators. Winter CCs do offer soil health benefits in Central Oregon but should not be viewed as a short-term fix to physical soil deficiencies. Our study provides strong evidence for the general ability of CCs to improve soil health in water-limited systems. It also demonstrates the need for further studies focused on multiyear rotations, especially related to the improvement of soil physical properties such as soil moisture availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20481","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Winter cover cropping to improve soil health in semiarid, irrigated cropping systems of Central Oregon\",\"authors\":\"Clare S. Sullivan,&nbsp;Markus Kleber\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agg2.20481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A 1-year experiment was conducted in Madras, OR, to examine the ability of winter cover crops (CCs) to improve physical, chemical, and biological soil properties over a bare fallow control. Competition for water is frequently seen as an obstacle to cover cropping in semiarid, irrigated systems. Benefits from CCs need to be demonstrated and quantified in regions such as Central Oregon's high desert for growers to make cost/benefit analysis decisions. To support such decisions, the effect of eight winter CC treatments (two brassicas, four legumes, two cereal mixtures) on five agronomic parameters and 39 soil health indicators (0–5 cm) were measured in the spring of 2019 after 8 months of CC growth. We identified four soil indicator response patterns in reference to the fallow: (i) steady improvement over fallow across all CCs (16 indicators, with hairy vetch and turnip being most efficient); (ii) marked improvement over fallow but somewhat constant response among CCs (organic C and N, surface hardness); (iii) negligible change from fallow; and (iv) varied response to CCs including both a deterioration and an improvement of soil health. Overall, 13 soil health indicators and five agronomic parameters responded significantly to CC treatment. CCs generated a stronger response of soil chemical and biological parameters than physical (average 82%, 79%, and 18% improvement over fallow, respectively). Hairy vetch had the greatest positive impact on soil biological and chemical properties but the lowest average impact on physical indicators. Winter CCs do offer soil health benefits in Central Oregon but should not be viewed as a short-term fix to physical soil deficiencies. Our study provides strong evidence for the general ability of CCs to improve soil health in water-limited systems. It also demonstrates the need for further studies focused on multiyear rotations, especially related to the improvement of soil physical properties such as soil moisture availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20481\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在俄勒冈州马德拉斯市进行了一项为期 1 年的实验,研究冬季覆盖作物(CC)与裸露休耕对照相比在改善土壤物理、化学和生物特性方面的能力。在半干旱的灌溉系统中,对水的竞争经常被视为覆盖种植的障碍。在俄勒冈州中部的高原沙漠等地区,种植者需要证明和量化 CC 的益处,以便做出成本/效益分析决策。为了支持此类决策,我们在 CC 生长 8 个月后的 2019 年春季测量了 8 种冬季 CC 处理(2 种黄铜类、4 种豆科植物、2 种谷物混合物)对 5 种农艺参数和 39 种土壤健康指标(0-5 厘米)的影响。针对休耕,我们确定了四种土壤指标响应模式:(i) 与休耕相比,所有 CC 的土壤指标都有稳步改善(16 项指标,其中毛茸茸的绒毛草和芜菁最有效);(ii) 与休耕相比,CC 的土壤指标有明显改善,但各 CC 的土壤指标(有机碳和有机氮、表面硬度)反应略有不同;(iii) 与休耕相比,CC 的土壤指标变化微乎其微;(iv) CC 对土壤健康的反应各不相同,既有恶化,也有改善。总体而言,13 个土壤健康指标和 5 个农艺参数对 CC 处理的反应显著。与物理参数相比,CCs 对土壤化学和生物参数的影响更大(与休耕相比,平均改善率分别为 82%、79% 和 18%)。毛状酢浆草对土壤生物和化学性质的积极影响最大,但对物理指标的平均影响最小。冬季 CC 的确能为俄勒冈州中部的土壤健康带来益处,但不应被视为短期解决土壤物理缺陷的方法。我们的研究有力地证明了 CCs 在限水系统中改善土壤健康的一般能力。研究还表明,有必要进一步开展以多年轮作为重点的研究,尤其是与改善土壤物理特性(如土壤水分可用性)相关的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Winter cover cropping to improve soil health in semiarid, irrigated cropping systems of Central Oregon

A 1-year experiment was conducted in Madras, OR, to examine the ability of winter cover crops (CCs) to improve physical, chemical, and biological soil properties over a bare fallow control. Competition for water is frequently seen as an obstacle to cover cropping in semiarid, irrigated systems. Benefits from CCs need to be demonstrated and quantified in regions such as Central Oregon's high desert for growers to make cost/benefit analysis decisions. To support such decisions, the effect of eight winter CC treatments (two brassicas, four legumes, two cereal mixtures) on five agronomic parameters and 39 soil health indicators (0–5 cm) were measured in the spring of 2019 after 8 months of CC growth. We identified four soil indicator response patterns in reference to the fallow: (i) steady improvement over fallow across all CCs (16 indicators, with hairy vetch and turnip being most efficient); (ii) marked improvement over fallow but somewhat constant response among CCs (organic C and N, surface hardness); (iii) negligible change from fallow; and (iv) varied response to CCs including both a deterioration and an improvement of soil health. Overall, 13 soil health indicators and five agronomic parameters responded significantly to CC treatment. CCs generated a stronger response of soil chemical and biological parameters than physical (average 82%, 79%, and 18% improvement over fallow, respectively). Hairy vetch had the greatest positive impact on soil biological and chemical properties but the lowest average impact on physical indicators. Winter CCs do offer soil health benefits in Central Oregon but should not be viewed as a short-term fix to physical soil deficiencies. Our study provides strong evidence for the general ability of CCs to improve soil health in water-limited systems. It also demonstrates the need for further studies focused on multiyear rotations, especially related to the improvement of soil physical properties such as soil moisture availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predicting spatiotemporal patterns of productivity and grazing from multispectral data using neural network analysis based on system complexity Combined inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi with Meso-rhizobium improves nutrient uptake, growth performance, and moisture stress tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Optimizing crop geometry for enhanced growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max L. (Merrill)] maturity groups in western Ethiopia Purple nutsedge management in tomato plasticulture: A study on the effectiveness of preemergence herbicide S-metolachlor and its co-application with fertilizer enhancer and chelated iron Persistence of dicamba residue in harvested soybeans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1