Duncan Snidal, Thomas Hale, Emily Jones, Claas Mertens, Karolina Milewicz
{"title":"弱者 \"的力量与国际组织","authors":"Duncan Snidal, Thomas Hale, Emily Jones, Claas Mertens, Karolina Milewicz","doi":"10.1007/s11558-024-09531-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By nearly every measure, power in the international system is concentrated, meaning that most states lack significant power resources. And yet international relations theory tends to focus on the behavior of great powers. This special issue instead explores the strategies that “weak” states use in the context of international organizations both to advance their interests and to resist pressure from stronger states. We define weakness as a relative lack of power across one or more dimensions. While the literature, to the extent it has focused on weak actors, has too often defined weakness solely in material terms, we adopt a broader conception that builds on the influential typology of power by Barnett and Duvall (Barnett and Duvall, 2005a, Barnett and Duvall, <i>International Organization</i> <i>59</i>, 39–75, 2005b). A multidimensional conceptualization of power allows analysts to show how actors that are weak in one dimension (often material power) may be stronger on other dimensions, giving them greater capacity for action than is often recognized. From this framework we create a typology of “strategies of the weak” that emphasizes the agency of weaker actors to make the most of their positions. The contributions to the special issue, summarized here, illuminate and substantiate many of these strategies across a diverse range of international organizations, understood as both forums and actors. As the articles show, these alternative theoretical mechanisms help explain how and why <i>seemingly</i> weak states sometimes fare better than a simplistic assessment of their material capabilities might suggest. By deepening our understanding of weakness and how it influences state behavior, the volume advances our theoretical understanding of how power is built, wielded, and resisted in and through international organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":75182,"journal":{"name":"The review of international organizations","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power of the “weak” and international organizations\",\"authors\":\"Duncan Snidal, Thomas Hale, Emily Jones, Claas Mertens, Karolina Milewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11558-024-09531-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>By nearly every measure, power in the international system is concentrated, meaning that most states lack significant power resources. And yet international relations theory tends to focus on the behavior of great powers. This special issue instead explores the strategies that “weak” states use in the context of international organizations both to advance their interests and to resist pressure from stronger states. We define weakness as a relative lack of power across one or more dimensions. While the literature, to the extent it has focused on weak actors, has too often defined weakness solely in material terms, we adopt a broader conception that builds on the influential typology of power by Barnett and Duvall (Barnett and Duvall, 2005a, Barnett and Duvall, <i>International Organization</i> <i>59</i>, 39–75, 2005b). A multidimensional conceptualization of power allows analysts to show how actors that are weak in one dimension (often material power) may be stronger on other dimensions, giving them greater capacity for action than is often recognized. From this framework we create a typology of “strategies of the weak” that emphasizes the agency of weaker actors to make the most of their positions. The contributions to the special issue, summarized here, illuminate and substantiate many of these strategies across a diverse range of international organizations, understood as both forums and actors. As the articles show, these alternative theoretical mechanisms help explain how and why <i>seemingly</i> weak states sometimes fare better than a simplistic assessment of their material capabilities might suggest. By deepening our understanding of weakness and how it influences state behavior, the volume advances our theoretical understanding of how power is built, wielded, and resisted in and through international organization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09531-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The review of international organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09531-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从几乎所有方面来看,国际体系中的权力都是集中的,这意味着大多数国家都缺乏重要的权力资源。然而,国际关系理论往往关注大国的行为。本特刊将探讨 "弱小 "国家在国际组织中为促进自身利益和抵制强国压力而采取的策略。我们将弱国定义为在一个或多个维度上相对缺乏实力。虽然文献关注的是弱小行为体,但往往仅从物质角度来定义弱小,而我们采用了更广泛的概念,该概念建立在巴尼特和杜瓦尔(Barnett and Duvall, 2005a, Barnett and Duvall, International Organization 59, 39-75, 2005b)颇具影响力的权力类型学基础之上。权力的多维概念化使分析人员能够说明,在某一维度(通常是物质权力)上处于弱势的行动者如何在其他维度上变得更强,从而使他们的行动能力比人们通常认识到的更强。根据这一框架,我们创建了一种 "弱者战略 "类型学,强调弱小行为者充分利用其地位的能动性。本特刊的文章(在此进行总结)阐明并证实了这些战略在各种国际组织中的应用,这些国际组织既可以被理解为论坛,也可以被理解为行动者。正如这些文章所显示的,这些替代性理论机制有助于解释为什么看似弱小的国家有时会比对其物质能力的简单评估所显示的更好。通过加深我们对弱国及其如何影响国家行为的理解,本卷推进了我们对权力如何在国际组织中建立、行使和抵制的理论理解。
The power of the “weak” and international organizations
By nearly every measure, power in the international system is concentrated, meaning that most states lack significant power resources. And yet international relations theory tends to focus on the behavior of great powers. This special issue instead explores the strategies that “weak” states use in the context of international organizations both to advance their interests and to resist pressure from stronger states. We define weakness as a relative lack of power across one or more dimensions. While the literature, to the extent it has focused on weak actors, has too often defined weakness solely in material terms, we adopt a broader conception that builds on the influential typology of power by Barnett and Duvall (Barnett and Duvall, 2005a, Barnett and Duvall, International Organization59, 39–75, 2005b). A multidimensional conceptualization of power allows analysts to show how actors that are weak in one dimension (often material power) may be stronger on other dimensions, giving them greater capacity for action than is often recognized. From this framework we create a typology of “strategies of the weak” that emphasizes the agency of weaker actors to make the most of their positions. The contributions to the special issue, summarized here, illuminate and substantiate many of these strategies across a diverse range of international organizations, understood as both forums and actors. As the articles show, these alternative theoretical mechanisms help explain how and why seemingly weak states sometimes fare better than a simplistic assessment of their material capabilities might suggest. By deepening our understanding of weakness and how it influences state behavior, the volume advances our theoretical understanding of how power is built, wielded, and resisted in and through international organization.