固定还是置换?患者对老年下肢骨折治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593241236647
John T Richards, Nathan N O'Hara, Kathleen Healy, Nicolas Zingas, Natasha McKibben, Caroline Benzel, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Marcus F Sciadini
{"title":"固定还是置换?患者对老年下肢骨折治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。","authors":"John T Richards, Nathan N O'Hara, Kathleen Healy, Nicolas Zingas, Natasha McKibben, Caroline Benzel, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Marcus F Sciadini","doi":"10.1177/21514593241236647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, <i>P</i> < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, <i>P</i> < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, <i>P</i> < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, <i>P</i> = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, <i>P</i> < .001 and 7%, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241236647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"John T Richards, Nathan N O'Hara, Kathleen Healy, Nicolas Zingas, Natasha McKibben, Caroline Benzel, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Marcus F Sciadini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593241236647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, <i>P</i> < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, <i>P</i> < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, <i>P</i> < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, <i>P</i> = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, <i>P</i> < .001 and 7%, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21514593241236647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241236647\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241236647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在为下肢骨折的老年患者考虑治疗方案时,人们对患者优先考虑的治疗效果知之甚少。本研究旨在确定老年下肢骨折患者对治疗结果的偏好:我们对在一级创伤中心接受下肢骨折治疗的 150 名至少 60 岁的患者进行了离散选择实验调查。离散选择实验为研究参与者提供了 8 组假设的结果比较,包括关节保留(是或否)、6 个月和 24 个月时再次手术的风险、术后负重状态、处置以及通过恢复基线步行距离来衡量的功能。我们使用多项式对数模型估算了这些潜在结果的相对重要性:结果:患者最希望治疗后保持功能(59%,P < .001),其次是 6 个月内再次手术(12%,P < .001)。虽然患者普遍倾向于保留关节,但如果关节置换能使患者的功能(行走距离)提高 13%(SE,66%),患者也愿意改变倾向,选择关节置换。对患者来说,降低短期再手术风险(12%,P < .001)比降低长期再手术风险(4%,P = .33)更重要。对患者来说,处置和负重状态的优先级较低(分别为 9%,P < .001 和 7%,P < .001):讨论:下肢骨折后,老年患者优先考虑保持行走功能。讨论:下肢骨折后,老年患者优先考虑的是保持行走功能,避免短期再次手术比避免长期再次手术更重要。除非关节置换术或关节置换术能提供有意义的功能性益处,否则通过骨折固定保留关节是老年患者的首选治疗方法。对患者来说,住院处置和术后负重状况不如其他结果重要:结论:老年患者在下肢骨折后对功能的重视程度高于其他结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Introduction: When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture.

Materials and methods: We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling.

Results: The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, P < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, P < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, P < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, P = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, P < .001 and 7%, P < .001, respectively).

Discussion: After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes.

Conclusions: Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Low Rate of Teriparatide Supplementation for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Females. Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures. Evaluation of Post-Operative Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Interventions: A Systematic Review. The Second Hip Fracture is not an Independent Predictor of Poor Outcomes in Elderly Patients - A Case-Control Study. Hip Fracture Patterns, Hospital Course, and Mortality Differ Between Males and Females.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1