扰乱视觉觅食的最佳决策:搜索经验的影响

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1037/xhp0001170
Honami Kobayashi, Hiroshi Matsui, Hirokazu Ogawa
{"title":"扰乱视觉觅食的最佳决策:搜索经验的影响","authors":"Honami Kobayashi, Hiroshi Matsui, Hirokazu Ogawa","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study introduces the diet-choice problem in foraging as a framework to investigate search and decision making in an uncertain environment. Using a mathematical model based on signal detection-based optimal foraging theory and conducting behavioral experiments, we examined whether the choice of uncertain options in a visual foraging task followed the optimal strategy. In addition, we explored whether search history affects behavior by changing the environment in a stepwise manner. We used a visual foraging task in which participants searched for visual stimuli and selected them using mouse clicks. To introduce uncertainty, the stimuli were designed in a way that they could not be completely discriminated by visual inspection. The study consisted of four sessions, during which the ratio of the number of gains to loss stimuli in Experiment 1 and the magnitude of loss in Experiment 2 were varied in a stepwise manner. Although search strategies can adapt to environmental changes, this adjustment is not always optimal. Specifically, although both the rising and falling groups experienced the same environment, their performance differed depending on the order in which participants experienced changing environments. Search strategy can be adjusted in the presence of environmental uncertainty, but it deviates from the optimal strategy due to the influence of the search history in the experienced environment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupting optimal decision making in visual foraging: The impact of search experience.\",\"authors\":\"Honami Kobayashi, Hiroshi Matsui, Hirokazu Ogawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study introduces the diet-choice problem in foraging as a framework to investigate search and decision making in an uncertain environment. Using a mathematical model based on signal detection-based optimal foraging theory and conducting behavioral experiments, we examined whether the choice of uncertain options in a visual foraging task followed the optimal strategy. In addition, we explored whether search history affects behavior by changing the environment in a stepwise manner. We used a visual foraging task in which participants searched for visual stimuli and selected them using mouse clicks. To introduce uncertainty, the stimuli were designed in a way that they could not be completely discriminated by visual inspection. The study consisted of four sessions, during which the ratio of the number of gains to loss stimuli in Experiment 1 and the magnitude of loss in Experiment 2 were varied in a stepwise manner. Although search strategies can adapt to environmental changes, this adjustment is not always optimal. Specifically, although both the rising and falling groups experienced the same environment, their performance differed depending on the order in which participants experienced changing environments. Search strategy can be adjusted in the presence of environmental uncertainty, but it deviates from the optimal strategy due to the influence of the search history in the experienced environment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将觅食中的饮食选择问题作为研究不确定环境中搜索和决策制定的框架。通过基于信号检测的最优觅食理论的数学模型和行为实验,我们考察了视觉觅食任务中不确定选项的选择是否遵循最优策略。此外,我们还探讨了搜索历史是否会通过逐步改变环境来影响行为。我们使用了一个视觉觅食任务,让参与者搜索视觉刺激物并通过鼠标点击进行选择。为了引入不确定性,刺激物被设计成无法通过视觉检查完全分辨出来。研究共进行了四次,在这四次中,实验一中获得刺激物与损失刺激物数量的比例和实验二中损失刺激物的大小以渐进的方式发生了变化。虽然搜索策略可以适应环境变化,但这种调整并不总是最佳的。具体来说,虽然上升组和下降组都经历了相同的环境,但他们的表现却因参与者经历环境变化的顺序而有所不同。在环境不确定的情况下,搜索策略是可以调整的,但由于受到所经历环境中搜索历史的影响,搜索策略会偏离最佳策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disrupting optimal decision making in visual foraging: The impact of search experience.

This study introduces the diet-choice problem in foraging as a framework to investigate search and decision making in an uncertain environment. Using a mathematical model based on signal detection-based optimal foraging theory and conducting behavioral experiments, we examined whether the choice of uncertain options in a visual foraging task followed the optimal strategy. In addition, we explored whether search history affects behavior by changing the environment in a stepwise manner. We used a visual foraging task in which participants searched for visual stimuli and selected them using mouse clicks. To introduce uncertainty, the stimuli were designed in a way that they could not be completely discriminated by visual inspection. The study consisted of four sessions, during which the ratio of the number of gains to loss stimuli in Experiment 1 and the magnitude of loss in Experiment 2 were varied in a stepwise manner. Although search strategies can adapt to environmental changes, this adjustment is not always optimal. Specifically, although both the rising and falling groups experienced the same environment, their performance differed depending on the order in which participants experienced changing environments. Search strategy can be adjusted in the presence of environmental uncertainty, but it deviates from the optimal strategy due to the influence of the search history in the experienced environment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Speeded classification of visual events is sensitive to crossmodal intensity correspondence. Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand. First impressions from faces in dynamic approach-avoidance contexts. Between-task transfer of item-specific control is replicable and extends to novel conditions. No evidence in favor of the existence of "intentional" binding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1