Alex L White, John Palmer, Genevieve Sanders, Jannat Hossain, Zelda B Zabinsky
The visual system can encode many stimuli simultaneously, but there are limits to how well multiple objects can be identified in parallel. At the extreme, some objects might have to be identified serially. The redundant target paradigm is one tool for distinguishing specific parallel and serial models. It compares responses to displays containing one target versus displays containing two targets. The typical result is a positive redundant target effect: faster correct responses to two targets, as predicted by many parallel models. Here, we generalize three standard models to account for response accuracy as well as speed. Surprisingly, two models predict a reversal of the redundant target effect (slower responses to two targets than to one target): the generalized standard serial model and a specific form of a fixed-capacity parallel model. To test that prediction, we measured performance for three different judgments of written words: color detection, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. The color task yielded positive redundant target effects, which reject the standard serial model. The semantic task yielded consistently negative effects, which are consistent with either the standard serial model or some limited-capacity parallel models. Thus, redundant targets can have negative effects, and they demonstrate limits that impair simultaneous recognition of two words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Negative effects of redundant targets.","authors":"Alex L White, John Palmer, Genevieve Sanders, Jannat Hossain, Zelda B Zabinsky","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001390","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The visual system can encode many stimuli simultaneously, but there are limits to how well multiple objects can be identified in parallel. At the extreme, some objects might have to be identified serially. The redundant target paradigm is one tool for distinguishing specific parallel and serial models. It compares responses to displays containing one target versus displays containing two targets. The typical result is a positive redundant target effect: faster correct responses to two targets, as predicted by many parallel models. Here, we generalize three standard models to account for response accuracy as well as speed. Surprisingly, two models predict a reversal of the redundant target effect (slower responses to two targets than to one target): the generalized standard serial model and a specific form of a fixed-capacity parallel model. To test that prediction, we measured performance for three different judgments of written words: color detection, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. The color task yielded positive redundant target effects, which reject the standard serial model. The semantic task yielded consistently negative effects, which are consistent with either the standard serial model or some limited-capacity parallel models. Thus, redundant targets can have negative effects, and they demonstrate limits that impair simultaneous recognition of two words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146108192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heather L Urry, Paul E Plonski, Prsni Patel, Monique D Cathern, Holly A Taylor, Tad T Brunyé
Perceived or actual time limits can negatively affect performance of motor tasks. Based on the integrative framework of stress, attention, and visuomotor performance, time pressure should affect visuomotor performance outcomes if it prompts, in turn, perceiving demands to exceed resources, a state of threat, and distractibility. We put this framework to a partial test by examining whether subjective distress, a marker of a state of threat, is a mechanism by which time pressure affects performance in two online studies (Ns = 93 and 148; 2022) of adults in the United States. Participants completed a route planning and tracing task in which we manipulated time pressure using a within-subjects urgency messaging (UM) manipulation. We measured subjective distress and fine motor behavior indexing information processing efficiency, route efficiency, and accuracy. We partitioned the total of effects of UM on performance into indirect and direct pathways and meta-analyzed them. In indirect pathways, UM increased distress which hampered information processing efficiency and route efficiency, but not accuracy. In direct pathways, UM increased information processing efficiency and route efficiency and decreased accuracy. The total effect of UM was to increase information processing efficiency but not route efficiency, and decrease accuracy. In sum, consistent with the integrative framework of stress, attention, and visuomotor performance, perceived time pressure affects visuomotor performance efficiency in part because it elicits subjective distress. Overall, these studies highlight the importance of modeling mechanisms and the utility of assessing two forms of performance efficiency and the effectiveness of fine motor behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Urgent, hurry up!!! Perceived time pressure affects fine motor performance via subjective distress in U.S. adults.","authors":"Heather L Urry, Paul E Plonski, Prsni Patel, Monique D Cathern, Holly A Taylor, Tad T Brunyé","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001386","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceived or actual time limits can negatively affect performance of motor tasks. Based on the integrative framework of stress, attention, and visuomotor performance, time pressure should affect visuomotor performance outcomes if it prompts, in turn, perceiving demands to exceed resources, a state of threat, and distractibility. We put this framework to a partial test by examining whether subjective distress, a marker of a state of threat, is a mechanism by which time pressure affects performance in two online studies (<i>N</i>s = 93 and 148; 2022) of adults in the United States. Participants completed a route planning and tracing task in which we manipulated time pressure using a within-subjects urgency messaging (UM) manipulation. We measured subjective distress and fine motor behavior indexing information processing efficiency, route efficiency, and accuracy. We partitioned the total of effects of UM on performance into indirect and direct pathways and meta-analyzed them. In indirect pathways, UM increased distress which hampered information processing efficiency and route efficiency, but not accuracy. In direct pathways, UM increased information processing efficiency and route efficiency and decreased accuracy. The total effect of UM was to increase information processing efficiency but not route efficiency, and decrease accuracy. In sum, consistent with the integrative framework of stress, attention, and visuomotor performance, perceived time pressure affects visuomotor performance efficiency in part because it elicits subjective distress. Overall, these studies highlight the importance of modeling mechanisms and the utility of assessing two forms of performance efficiency and the effectiveness of fine motor behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Klaudia B Ambroziak, Sophie Field, Matthew R Longo, Elena Azañón
Recent research has highlighted the importance of information about adiposity in the visual perception of both bodies and faces. Behavioral and neuroimaging studies have demonstrated the existence of category-selective visual representations of faces and bodies, as well as integrated whole-person representations. It remains unknown whether visual perception of adiposity arises from category-selective or whole-person mechanisms. Here, we show that whole-person representations are involved by showing cross-category transfer of adaptation aftereffects to adiposity between faces and bodies. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that adaptation to a gaunt face biases judgments of subsequently presented faces, complementing previous research demonstrating adiposity aftereffects in bodies. We then demonstrate cross-category transfer of such aftereffects from faces to bodies (Experiments 2 and 3) and from bodies to faces (Experiment 4). Cross-category transfer, however, was substantially weaker than within-category transfer and was not consistently observed across all individual conditions. A control study (Experiment 5) showed no adaptation when adapting face stimuli were inverted, suggesting that the effects are unlikely to result from nonspecific low-level features of the stimuli. These results demonstrate functional interactions between visual representations of faces and bodies in the perception of adiposity, suggesting the involvement of integrated whole-person representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Adaptation aftereffects to adiposity across bodies and faces.","authors":"Klaudia B Ambroziak, Sophie Field, Matthew R Longo, Elena Azañón","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001381","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has highlighted the importance of information about adiposity in the visual perception of both bodies and faces. Behavioral and neuroimaging studies have demonstrated the existence of category-selective visual representations of faces and bodies, as well as integrated whole-person representations. It remains unknown whether visual perception of adiposity arises from category-selective or whole-person mechanisms. Here, we show that whole-person representations are involved by showing cross-category transfer of adaptation aftereffects to adiposity between faces and bodies. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that adaptation to a gaunt face biases judgments of subsequently presented faces, complementing previous research demonstrating adiposity aftereffects in bodies. We then demonstrate cross-category transfer of such aftereffects from faces to bodies (Experiments 2 and 3) and from bodies to faces (Experiment 4). Cross-category transfer, however, was substantially weaker than within-category transfer and was not consistently observed across all individual conditions. A control study (Experiment 5) showed no adaptation when adapting face stimuli were inverted, suggesting that the effects are unlikely to result from nonspecific low-level features of the stimuli. These results demonstrate functional interactions between visual representations of faces and bodies in the perception of adiposity, suggesting the involvement of integrated whole-person representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001370
Laura Saad, Pernille Hemmer, Julien Musolino
The sense of agency is a fundamental aspect of human experience. Temporal binding, the subjective compression of the perceived time interval between an action and its outcome, has previously been assumed to be an implicit measure of the sense of agency. Here, we investigate whether the characteristic directionality of the temporal binding effect is consistently present at the individual level. We first deaggregated the data from three temporal binding data sets and systematically reanalyzed and revisualized these effects at the individual level. This analysis revealed consistent differences in the directionality of the temporal binding effect at the individual level. We next implemented a validated Bayes factor mixed-method modeling approach (Rouder & Haaf, 2021), which simulated individual true effects in two additional data sets and determined that the observed differences in directionality remained after accounting for sampling noise. Model comparison determined that the least constrained model, that is, the one that allowed for individual differences in the magnitude and directionality of the effect, was the best fitting model. These results provide strong support for the presence of qualitative differences in the temporal binding effect. Implications for both the theoretical and applied future of this literature are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
能动性是人类经验的一个基本方面。时间约束,即行动与其结果之间感知到的时间间隔的主观压缩,以前被认为是代理感的一种隐含测量。在这里,我们研究了时间约束效应的特征方向性是否在个体水平上一致存在。我们首先从三个时间绑定数据集中分解数据,并在个人层面上系统地重新分析和修正了这些影响。该分析揭示了个体水平上时间约束效应方向性的一致差异。接下来,我们实施了一种经过验证的贝叶斯因子混合方法建模方法(Rouder & Haaf, 2021),该方法在另外两个数据集中模拟了个体的真实效果,并确定在考虑采样噪声后观察到的方向性差异仍然存在。模型比较表明,约束最小的模型,即允许效应的大小和方向性存在个体差异的模型,是最佳拟合模型。这些结果为时间结合效应存在质的差异提供了强有力的支持。讨论了这一文献的理论和应用前景。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Evidence for individual differences in the temporal binding effect.","authors":"Laura Saad, Pernille Hemmer, Julien Musolino","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001370","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sense of agency is a fundamental aspect of human experience. Temporal binding, the subjective compression of the perceived time interval between an action and its outcome, has previously been assumed to be an implicit measure of the sense of agency. Here, we investigate whether the characteristic directionality of the temporal binding effect is consistently present at the individual level. We first deaggregated the data from three temporal binding data sets and systematically reanalyzed and revisualized these effects at the individual level. This analysis revealed consistent differences in the directionality of the temporal binding effect at the individual level. We next implemented a validated Bayes factor mixed-method modeling approach (Rouder & Haaf, 2021), which simulated individual true effects in two additional data sets and determined that the observed differences in directionality remained after accounting for sampling noise. Model comparison determined that the least constrained model, that is, the one that allowed for individual differences in the magnitude and directionality of the effect, was the best fitting model. These results provide strong support for the presence of qualitative differences in the temporal binding effect. Implications for both the theoretical and applied future of this literature are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"100-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001377
Alexandre de Pontes Nobre, Gabriel Paris-Colombo, Peter Maurice Erna Claessens, André Mascioli Cravo
Humans and nonhuman animals can anticipate the timing of events to react fast and accurately, an ability called temporal preparation. Events in the environment can be initiated either externally or voluntarily, yet research on temporal preparation has so far focused mainly on externally initiated events. This study examined how voluntary actions influence temporal preparation for visual stimuli. Across four experiments conducted between 2022 and 2024, we compared reaction times using variable and constant foreperiods (FPs). In each experiment, target stimuli were self-initiated (action task) or externally initiated (external task), with FPs ranging from 0.6 to 2.8 s. Participants performed a go/no-go task (Experiment 1) or an orientation discrimination task (Experiments 2-4). We observed slower reaction times for self-initiated stimuli than for externally initiated stimuli, particularly at shorter FPs. The effect diminished as FP duration increased. This pattern was observed only in variable-FP experiments, indicating an interaction between voluntary actions and FP variability. In contrast, a constant-FP experiment did not show significant differences between action and external tasks. These findings suggest that voluntary actions influence temporal preparation in the presence of temporal uncertainty. We discuss how these results relate to current theories of temporal preparation, proposing new perspectives on the role of voluntary actions in shaping anticipatory behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
人类和非人类动物都能预测事件发生的时间,从而做出快速而准确的反应,这种能力被称为时间准备。环境中的事件既可以由外部启动,也可以由自愿启动,但迄今为止对时间准备的研究主要集中在外部启动的事件上。本研究考察了自愿行为如何影响视觉刺激的时间准备。在2022年至2024年间进行的四次实验中,我们使用可变前周期和恒定前周期(FPs)比较了反应时间。在每个实验中,目标刺激分为自我启动(动作任务)和外部启动(外部任务)两种,FPs范围为0.6 ~ 2.8 s。参与者执行了一个去/不去的任务(实验1)或一个定向辨别任务(实验2-4)。我们观察到自我刺激的反应时间比外部刺激慢,特别是在较短的FPs时。效果随着FP持续时间的增加而减弱。这种模式仅在可变FP实验中观察到,表明自愿行为和FP变异性之间存在相互作用。相比之下,恒定fp实验没有显示出行动任务和外部任务之间的显著差异。这些发现表明,在存在时间不确定性的情况下,自愿行为会影响时间准备。我们讨论了这些结果如何与当前的时间准备理论相关联,并提出了自愿行为在形成预期行为中的作用的新观点。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The influence of voluntary actions on temporal preparation to visual stimuli.","authors":"Alexandre de Pontes Nobre, Gabriel Paris-Colombo, Peter Maurice Erna Claessens, André Mascioli Cravo","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001377","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans and nonhuman animals can anticipate the timing of events to react fast and accurately, an ability called temporal preparation. Events in the environment can be initiated either externally or voluntarily, yet research on temporal preparation has so far focused mainly on externally initiated events. This study examined how voluntary actions influence temporal preparation for visual stimuli. Across four experiments conducted between 2022 and 2024, we compared reaction times using variable and constant foreperiods (FPs). In each experiment, target stimuli were self-initiated (action task) or externally initiated (external task), with FPs ranging from 0.6 to 2.8 s. Participants performed a go/no-go task (Experiment 1) or an orientation discrimination task (Experiments 2-4). We observed slower reaction times for self-initiated stimuli than for externally initiated stimuli, particularly at shorter FPs. The effect diminished as FP duration increased. This pattern was observed only in variable-FP experiments, indicating an interaction between voluntary actions and FP variability. In contrast, a constant-FP experiment did not show significant differences between action and external tasks. These findings suggest that voluntary actions influence temporal preparation in the presence of temporal uncertainty. We discuss how these results relate to current theories of temporal preparation, proposing new perspectives on the role of voluntary actions in shaping anticipatory behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"57-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001375
Yayla A Ilksoy, Dirk van Moorselaar, Benchi Wang, Sander A Los, Jan Theeuwes
Our attention is influenced by past experiences, and recent studies have shown that individuals learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment, resulting in attentional suppression of locations that are likely to contain a distractor (high probability [HP] location). However, little is known as to whether this learned suppression operates in retinotopic (relative to the eyes) or spatiotopic (relative to the world) coordinates. In the current study, two circular search arrays were presented side by side. Participants learned the HP location from a learning array presented on one side of the display (e.g., left). After several trials, participants shifted their gaze to the center of the test array (e.g., located on the right side) in which all locations were equally likely to contain the distractor. Due to the saccade, the test array contained both a spatiotopic and a retinotopic matching location relative to the original HP location. The current findings show that, following saccadic eye movements, the learned suppression remained in retinotopic coordinates only, with no measurable transfer to spatiotopic coordinates. Even in a rich environment, attentional suppression still operated exclusively in retinotopic coordinates. We speculate that learned suppression may be resolved by changing synaptic weights in early visual areas. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
我们的注意力受到过去经验的影响,最近的研究表明,个体学会从环境中提取统计规律,从而导致对可能包含干扰物的位置(高概率[HP]位置)的注意力抑制。然而,对于这种习得性抑制是否在视网膜位(相对于眼睛)或空间位(相对于世界)坐标中起作用,我们知之甚少。在本研究中,两个圆形搜索阵列并排呈现。参与者通过展示在显示器一侧(如左侧)的学习阵列来学习HP的位置。经过几次试验后,参与者将目光转移到测试阵列的中心(例如,位于右侧),其中所有位置都有可能包含分心物。由于眼跳,测试阵列包含相对于原始HP位置的空间位和视网膜位匹配位置。目前的研究结果表明,在跳眼运动后,习得性抑制仅停留在视网膜位坐标上,没有可测量的转移到空间位坐标。即使在丰富的环境中,注意抑制仍然只在视网膜异位坐标中起作用。我们推测,习得性抑制可能通过改变早期视觉区域的突触权重来解决。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Distractor suppression operates exclusively in retinotopic coordinates.","authors":"Yayla A Ilksoy, Dirk van Moorselaar, Benchi Wang, Sander A Los, Jan Theeuwes","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001375","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our attention is influenced by past experiences, and recent studies have shown that individuals learn to extract statistical regularities in the environment, resulting in attentional suppression of locations that are likely to contain a distractor (high probability [HP] location). However, little is known as to whether this learned suppression operates in retinotopic (relative to the eyes) or spatiotopic (relative to the world) coordinates. In the current study, two circular search arrays were presented side by side. Participants learned the HP location from a learning array presented on one side of the display (e.g., left). After several trials, participants shifted their gaze to the center of the test array (e.g., located on the right side) in which all locations were equally likely to contain the distractor. Due to the saccade, the test array contained both a spatiotopic and a retinotopic matching location relative to the original HP location. The current findings show that, following saccadic eye movements, the learned suppression remained in retinotopic coordinates only, with no measurable transfer to spatiotopic coordinates. Even in a rich environment, attentional suppression still operated exclusively in retinotopic coordinates. We speculate that learned suppression may be resolved by changing synaptic weights in early visual areas. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"30-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001373
Daniel N Bub, Noah Moise, Michael E J Masson
We present new evidence on the role that action representations play in the speeded naming of tools/utensils. In a series of experiments (minimum sample size = 30), participants held in working memory (WM) a sequence of two hand actions, both of which involved a particular hand (left or right) and orientation of the wrist (horizontal or vertical). While under this load, participants named objects that had a horizontal or vertical handle aligned to the left or right. Naming time was elevated when the WM load and the object's handle were congruent on one dimension (hand or orientation) but incongruent on the other, relative to when both dimensions were congruent or incongruent. We assumed that features of the action sequence in WM, including the laterality and wrist orientation of the hand postures, are bound together. If just one of these features (say, hand laterality) is recapitulated in the object presented for naming, a mismatching feature (in this instance, wrist orientation) would automatically be retrieved from WM. The resulting conflict induces a delay in the naming response (partial-repetition cost). No such effect was observed when the task required a decision about the upright/inverted status or the semantic category of an object (i.e., whether the tool/utensil is typically found in a kitchen or garage). Furthermore, no partial-repetition cost occurred on a speeded reach-and-grasp action afforded by the handle of a depicted object. We infer that the effect of action features in WM occurred because motor representations were directly consulted for name retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
我们提出了关于动作表征在快速命名工具/器具中所起作用的新证据。在一系列实验中(最小样本量= 30),参与者在工作记忆(WM)中记住一系列的两个手部动作,这两个动作都涉及特定的手(左手或右手)和手腕的方向(水平或垂直)。在这种负荷下,参与者们命名了水平或垂直手柄向左或向右对齐的物体。当WM负载和物体手柄在一个维度(手或方向)上一致而在另一个维度上不一致时,相对于两个维度都一致或不一致时,命名时间会增加。我们假设WM中动作序列的特征,包括手部姿势的横向和手腕方向,是捆绑在一起的。如果在要命名的对象中再现了这些特征中的一个(例如,手的横向性),则会自动从WM中检索不匹配的特征(在本例中为手腕方向)。由此产生的冲突导致命名响应延迟(部分重复代价)。当任务要求决定直立/倒置状态或物体的语义类别(即,工具/器具是否通常在厨房或车库中找到)时,没有观察到这种影响。此外,在描绘对象的手柄提供的快速伸手和抓握动作上没有部分重复成本。我们推断,动作特征在WM中的作用是因为运动表征被直接用于名称检索。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Contributions of action representations to tool naming.","authors":"Daniel N Bub, Noah Moise, Michael E J Masson","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001373","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present new evidence on the role that action representations play in the speeded naming of tools/utensils. In a series of experiments (minimum sample size = 30), participants held in working memory (WM) a sequence of two hand actions, both of which involved a particular hand (left or right) and orientation of the wrist (horizontal or vertical). While under this load, participants named objects that had a horizontal or vertical handle aligned to the left or right. Naming time was elevated when the WM load and the object's handle were congruent on one dimension (hand or orientation) but incongruent on the other, relative to when both dimensions were congruent or incongruent. We assumed that features of the action sequence in WM, including the laterality and wrist orientation of the hand postures, are bound together. If just one of these features (say, hand laterality) is recapitulated in the object presented for naming, a mismatching feature (in this instance, wrist orientation) would automatically be retrieved from WM. The resulting conflict induces a delay in the naming response (partial-repetition cost). No such effect was observed when the task required a decision about the upright/inverted status or the semantic category of an object (i.e., whether the tool/utensil is typically found in a kitchen or garage). Furthermore, no partial-repetition cost occurred on a speeded reach-and-grasp action afforded by the handle of a depicted object. We infer that the effect of action features in WM occurred because motor representations were directly consulted for name retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145138725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001380
Tianyu Zhang, Andrew B Leber
People vary widely in how strategically they guide their attention during visual search. What drives this variation? We contrasted two possibilities: one in which individuals are predisposed to attend to different stimulus aspects, and another in which individuals flexibly choose their strategies depending on the task parameters. Using the adaptive choice visual search paradigm, we measured participants' search strategies while probing various display features to index how participants attended the displays. Experiment 1 showed that participants who attended the stimulus properties that are essential for the optimal search strategy-specifically, the numerosity subset information-exhibited more optimal performance. In Experiment 2, we made the subset information irrelevant for optimal task performance and found no relationship between attention to the subsets and search optimality, which is consistent with the strategic choice account. Experiment 3 encouraged attention to the subset information without explicitly requiring optimal search. Results showed a small but significant boost in optimality, suggesting that overcoming a reluctance to engage in numerosity judgments fosters better strategy use. Overall, these results help to explain individual variation in attentional strategy use, with optimal searchers judiciously directing their attention to process the critical stimulus properties while nonoptimal searchers avoid doing so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
人们在视觉搜索过程中引导注意力的策略差异很大。是什么导致了这种变化?我们对比了两种可能性:一种是个体倾向于关注不同的刺激方面,另一种是个体根据任务参数灵活选择策略。使用自适应选择视觉搜索范式,我们测量了参与者的搜索策略,同时探测了各种显示特征,以索引参与者如何参加显示。实验1显示,参与对最优搜索策略至关重要的刺激属性的参与者(特别是数量子集信息)表现出更优的表现。在实验2中,我们使子集信息与最优任务性能无关,并且发现对子集的关注与搜索最优性之间没有关系,这与策略选择的说法一致。实验3鼓励对子集信息的关注,而没有明确要求最优搜索。结果显示,最优性虽小但有显著提高,这表明克服不愿进行大量判断的心态有助于更好地使用策略。总的来说,这些结果有助于解释注意策略使用的个体差异,最优搜索者明智地引导他们的注意力处理关键的刺激特性,而非最优搜索者则避免这样做。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"What distinguishes optimal visual searchers? Evidence from a probe procedure.","authors":"Tianyu Zhang, Andrew B Leber","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001380","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People vary widely in how strategically they guide their attention during visual search. What drives this variation? We contrasted two possibilities: one in which individuals are predisposed to attend to different stimulus aspects, and another in which individuals flexibly choose their strategies depending on the task parameters. Using the adaptive choice visual search paradigm, we measured participants' search strategies while probing various display features to index how participants attended the displays. Experiment 1 showed that participants who attended the stimulus properties that are essential for the optimal search strategy-specifically, the numerosity subset information-exhibited more optimal performance. In Experiment 2, we made the subset information irrelevant for optimal task performance and found no relationship between attention to the subsets and search optimality, which is consistent with the strategic choice account. Experiment 3 encouraged attention to the subset information without explicitly requiring optimal search. Results showed a small but significant boost in optimality, suggesting that overcoming a reluctance to engage in numerosity judgments fosters better strategy use. Overall, these results help to explain individual variation in attentional strategy use, with optimal searchers judiciously directing their attention to process the critical stimulus properties while nonoptimal searchers avoid doing so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001376
Gabor Lengyel, Attila Krajcsi
Studying numerical interferences has become a widely used method for investigating the representations that underlie numerical cognition. Here, we contrast the classic pure approximate number system (ANS) framework and a more recently proposed hybrid approximate number system-discrete semantic system framework with respect to their distinctive predictions for the nonsymbolic and symbolic spatial numerical associations of response codes (SNARC) effect (the most extensively studied interference between numbers and space). We compare the symbolic (Indo-Arabic numerals) to the nonsymbolic (arrays of dots) version of a SNARC paradigm (n = 77). In contrast to previous studies, in the present experiment, (a) the magnitude is irrelevant for solving the task (a color judgment task), and (b) the nonsymbolic stimuli contain arrays of dots outside the subitizing range, ensuring to activate the ANS. We found clear evidence for the SNARC effect in the symbolic color task. However, we found no indication of the SNARC effect in the nonsymbolic color task. This pattern of results supports the hybrid approximate number system-discrete semantic system framework, assuming that the SNARC interference is a symbolic effect while refuting the pure ANS view of the SNARC effect, which necessitates the presence of the SNARC interference using a nonsymbolic format, too. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
研究数值干扰已成为研究数值认知表征的一种广泛使用的方法。在这里,我们对比了经典的纯近似数字系统(ANS)框架和最近提出的混合近似数字系统-离散语义系统框架,以及它们对响应码(SNARC)效应(最广泛研究的数字与空间之间的干扰)的非符号和符号空间数字关联的独特预测。我们比较了SNARC范式的符号(印度-阿拉伯数字)和非符号(点数组)版本(n = 77)。与以往的研究相比,在本实验中,(a)大小与解决任务(颜色判断任务)无关,(b)非符号刺激中包含的点阵列超出了子化范围,确保了ANS的激活。我们在符号颜色任务中发现了SNARC效应的明显证据。然而,我们在非符号颜色任务中没有发现SNARC效应的迹象。这种结果模式支持混合近似数系统离散语义系统框架,假设SNARC干扰是一种符号效应,同时反驳了SNARC效应的纯ANS观点,后者也要求SNARC干扰以非符号格式存在。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"No observable spatial numerical associations of response codes effect with numbers in nonsymbolic format.","authors":"Gabor Lengyel, Attila Krajcsi","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001376","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studying numerical interferences has become a widely used method for investigating the representations that underlie numerical cognition. Here, we contrast the classic pure approximate number system (ANS) framework and a more recently proposed hybrid approximate number system-discrete semantic system framework with respect to their distinctive predictions for the nonsymbolic and symbolic spatial numerical associations of response codes (SNARC) effect (the most extensively studied interference between numbers and space). We compare the symbolic (Indo-Arabic numerals) to the nonsymbolic (arrays of dots) version of a SNARC paradigm (<i>n</i> = 77). In contrast to previous studies, in the present experiment, (a) the magnitude is irrelevant for solving the task (a color judgment task), and (b) the nonsymbolic stimuli contain arrays of dots outside the subitizing range, ensuring to activate the ANS. We found clear evidence for the SNARC effect in the symbolic color task. However, we found no indication of the SNARC effect in the nonsymbolic color task. This pattern of results supports the hybrid approximate number system-discrete semantic system framework, assuming that the SNARC interference is a symbolic effect while refuting the pure ANS view of the SNARC effect, which necessitates the presence of the SNARC interference using a nonsymbolic format, too. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"44-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-27DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001379
Meital Friedman-Oskar, Tomer Sahar, Tal Makovski, Hadas Okon-Singer
Negative valence images benefit memory tasks as well as visual statistical learning (VSL) tasks. Another factor that strongly drives memory performance: image memorability-an inherent property of the image regarding its likelihood to be remembered across observers. Here, we examined the influence of image memorability and emotional valence on VSL and the potential role of memorability explaining the benefit of negative valence in VSL tasks. In three VSL experiments, participants viewed a stream of repeating triplets of images. Importantly, the triplets were constructed of varying images in their emotional valence and memorability scores. Memorability significantly influenced VSL performance, with high-memorability images enhancing learning compared to low-memorability images. The benefit of negative valence was also replicated but emerged only under low-memorability conditions. Similarly, when valence was held constant, the effect of memorability was evident only for neutral images. These findings indicate that memorability is a robust and consistent driver of VSL. However, its influence is not fixed, it can be modulated by emotional valence and cannot fully account for the benefit seen with negative emotion. Taken together, our study provides new insights into the role of image memorability in VSL and highlights the importance of considering its interaction with emotional valence in incidental visual memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
负效价图像有利于记忆任务和视觉统计学习任务。另一个强烈推动记忆性能的因素是:图像可记忆性——图像的固有属性,它与观察者记住图像的可能性有关。在此,我们考察了图像记忆和情绪效价对虚拟语言的影响,以及记忆在虚拟语言任务中解释负效价优势的潜在作用。在三个VSL实验中,参与者观看了一系列重复的三组图像。重要的是,三胞胎的情感效价和记忆分数是由不同的图像构成的。记忆性显著影响VSL表现,与低记忆性图像相比,高记忆性图像增强了学习。负效价的好处也被复制,但只在低记忆条件下出现。同样,当效价保持不变时,记忆的效果只对中性图像有明显的影响。这些发现表明,记忆是一个强大的和一致的驱动VSL。然而,它的影响不是固定的,它可以被情绪效价调节,并不能完全解释负面情绪所带来的好处。综上所述,我们的研究为图像记忆在视觉语言中的作用提供了新的见解,并强调了在附带视觉记忆中考虑其与情绪效价相互作用的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Independent effects of valence and memorability in visual statistical learning.","authors":"Meital Friedman-Oskar, Tomer Sahar, Tal Makovski, Hadas Okon-Singer","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001379","DOIUrl":"10.1037/xhp0001379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative valence images benefit memory tasks as well as visual statistical learning (VSL) tasks. Another factor that strongly drives memory performance: image memorability-an inherent property of the image regarding its likelihood to be remembered across observers. Here, we examined the influence of image memorability and emotional valence on VSL and the potential role of memorability explaining the benefit of negative valence in VSL tasks. In three VSL experiments, participants viewed a stream of repeating triplets of images. Importantly, the triplets were constructed of varying images in their emotional valence and memorability scores. Memorability significantly influenced VSL performance, with high-memorability images enhancing learning compared to low-memorability images. The benefit of negative valence was also replicated but emerged only under low-memorability conditions. Similarly, when valence was held constant, the effect of memorability was evident only for neutral images. These findings indicate that memorability is a robust and consistent driver of VSL. However, its influence is not fixed, it can be modulated by emotional valence and cannot fully account for the benefit seen with negative emotion. Taken together, our study provides new insights into the role of image memorability in VSL and highlights the importance of considering its interaction with emotional valence in incidental visual memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":"74-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}