认证权--参与性担保体系(PGS)的制度化:拉丁美洲跨国比较

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100748
Nikolaus Hruschka, Sonja Kaufmann, Christian R. Vogl
{"title":"认证权--参与性担保体系(PGS)的制度化:拉丁美洲跨国比较","authors":"Nikolaus Hruschka,&nbsp;Sonja Kaufmann,&nbsp;Christian R. Vogl","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing worldwide interest in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) requires an exploration of how countries approach PGS institutionalization. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews, a comparative cross-country study was conducted in nine Latin American countries to examine how PGS are defined, regulated, and promoted at a national level. The results demonstrated that the countries take differing approaches to PGS institutionalization, and that there is a widespread lack of financial and/or technical support structures specifically targeted at PGS initiatives. While most national competent authorities do not have an overview of the current status of PGS initiatives and PGS consumers, several case study countries indicate a common interest in the development of PGS export opportunities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100748"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The right to certify – Institutionalizing participatory guarantee systems (PGS): A Latin American cross-country comparison\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Hruschka,&nbsp;Sonja Kaufmann,&nbsp;Christian R. Vogl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Growing worldwide interest in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) requires an exploration of how countries approach PGS institutionalization. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews, a comparative cross-country study was conducted in nine Latin American countries to examine how PGS are defined, regulated, and promoted at a national level. The results demonstrated that the countries take differing approaches to PGS institutionalization, and that there is a widespread lack of financial and/or technical support structures specifically targeted at PGS initiatives. While most national competent authorities do not have an overview of the current status of PGS initiatives and PGS consumers, several case study countries indicate a common interest in the development of PGS export opportunities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912424000105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界对参与式担保体系(PGS)的兴趣与日俱增,因此需要探讨各国如何将 PGS 制度化。通过文件分析和半结构式访谈,我们在九个拉丁美洲国家开展了一项跨国比较研究,探讨如何在国家层面对参与式担保体系进行定义、监管和推广。研究结果表明,这些国家对 PGS 制度化采取了不同的方法,而且普遍缺乏专门针对 PGS 计划的财政和/或技术支持机构。虽然大多数国家的主管当局并不了解私营担保交易倡议和私营担保交易消费者的现状,但一些案例研究国家表示对开发私营担保交易出口机会有着共同的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The right to certify – Institutionalizing participatory guarantee systems (PGS): A Latin American cross-country comparison

Growing worldwide interest in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) requires an exploration of how countries approach PGS institutionalization. Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews, a comparative cross-country study was conducted in nine Latin American countries to examine how PGS are defined, regulated, and promoted at a national level. The results demonstrated that the countries take differing approaches to PGS institutionalization, and that there is a widespread lack of financial and/or technical support structures specifically targeted at PGS initiatives. While most national competent authorities do not have an overview of the current status of PGS initiatives and PGS consumers, several case study countries indicate a common interest in the development of PGS export opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the power of green leafy vegetables: Cultivating diversity for health, environmental benefits, and sustainability Do diverse crops or diverse market purchases matter more for women's diet quality in farm households of Mali? How to monitor the ‘success’ of agricultural sustainability: A perspective Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1