Tae Kyung Yoon , Ji Yong Myeong , Yuju Lee , Yun Eui Choi , Seonghun Lee , Sugwang Lee , Chaeho Byun
{"title":"您能接受森林过度旅游吗?韩国步道游客的拥挤感、满意度和管理措施之间的关系","authors":"Tae Kyung Yoon , Ji Yong Myeong , Yuju Lee , Yun Eui Choi , Seonghun Lee , Sugwang Lee , Chaeho Byun","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In forest tourism, overtourism and overcrowding can have ecological and environmental impacts, overburden management systems, and negatively impact visitor experiences. Management approaches to address overtourism and crowding can be conservationist or developmentalist, depending on visitors' crowding perception. This case study field surveyed 581 visitors on a forest trail in South Korea. Differences in crowding perception, satisfaction, contingent valuation, and management action were analyzed by using visitor demographics and visiting season. Their interrelation path was investigated using a structural equation model. The acceptable level of person at one time (PAOT) was determined using an in-situ visual experiment. Sex and age of respondents did not impact crowding perception and satisfaction; however, acceptable level of PAOT and satisfaction with trail difficulty were higher as the age increased. Respondents perceived encounter frequency and crowding between visiting seasons differently. Satisfaction decreased when visitors evaluated more crowding. Crowding norm curves were developed for each of the responses for acceptable level of PAOT in the visual experiment; older visitors were more tolerant of overcrowding than younger visitors. The path between perceived encounters, evaluated crowding, and norms was confirmed. Preferred management actions were affected by crowding perception, satisfaction with facilities and trail difficulty, and age. In the East Asian context, where population density and need for forest tourism are high, this study suggests that visitors' crowding perception should be thoroughly considered in carrying capacity management in forest tourism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are you okay with overtourism in forests? Path between crowding perception, satisfaction, and management action of trail visitors in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"Tae Kyung Yoon , Ji Yong Myeong , Yuju Lee , Yun Eui Choi , Seonghun Lee , Sugwang Lee , Chaeho Byun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In forest tourism, overtourism and overcrowding can have ecological and environmental impacts, overburden management systems, and negatively impact visitor experiences. Management approaches to address overtourism and crowding can be conservationist or developmentalist, depending on visitors' crowding perception. This case study field surveyed 581 visitors on a forest trail in South Korea. Differences in crowding perception, satisfaction, contingent valuation, and management action were analyzed by using visitor demographics and visiting season. Their interrelation path was investigated using a structural equation model. The acceptable level of person at one time (PAOT) was determined using an in-situ visual experiment. Sex and age of respondents did not impact crowding perception and satisfaction; however, acceptable level of PAOT and satisfaction with trail difficulty were higher as the age increased. Respondents perceived encounter frequency and crowding between visiting seasons differently. Satisfaction decreased when visitors evaluated more crowding. Crowding norm curves were developed for each of the responses for acceptable level of PAOT in the visual experiment; older visitors were more tolerant of overcrowding than younger visitors. The path between perceived encounters, evaluated crowding, and norms was confirmed. Preferred management actions were affected by crowding perception, satisfaction with facilities and trail difficulty, and age. In the East Asian context, where population density and need for forest tourism are high, this study suggests that visitors' crowding perception should be thoroughly considered in carrying capacity management in forest tourism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are you okay with overtourism in forests? Path between crowding perception, satisfaction, and management action of trail visitors in South Korea
In forest tourism, overtourism and overcrowding can have ecological and environmental impacts, overburden management systems, and negatively impact visitor experiences. Management approaches to address overtourism and crowding can be conservationist or developmentalist, depending on visitors' crowding perception. This case study field surveyed 581 visitors on a forest trail in South Korea. Differences in crowding perception, satisfaction, contingent valuation, and management action were analyzed by using visitor demographics and visiting season. Their interrelation path was investigated using a structural equation model. The acceptable level of person at one time (PAOT) was determined using an in-situ visual experiment. Sex and age of respondents did not impact crowding perception and satisfaction; however, acceptable level of PAOT and satisfaction with trail difficulty were higher as the age increased. Respondents perceived encounter frequency and crowding between visiting seasons differently. Satisfaction decreased when visitors evaluated more crowding. Crowding norm curves were developed for each of the responses for acceptable level of PAOT in the visual experiment; older visitors were more tolerant of overcrowding than younger visitors. The path between perceived encounters, evaluated crowding, and norms was confirmed. Preferred management actions were affected by crowding perception, satisfaction with facilities and trail difficulty, and age. In the East Asian context, where population density and need for forest tourism are high, this study suggests that visitors' crowding perception should be thoroughly considered in carrying capacity management in forest tourism.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.