从业人员重新调整经济的能力:机构在安大略省地方经济抵御工厂关闭中的作用

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Growth and Change Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1111/grow.12716
Jesse Sutton, Godwin Arku, Richard Sadler, John Hutchenreuther, Michael Buzzelli
{"title":"从业人员重新调整经济的能力:机构在安大略省地方经济抵御工厂关闭中的作用","authors":"Jesse Sutton,&nbsp;Godwin Arku,&nbsp;Richard Sadler,&nbsp;John Hutchenreuther,&nbsp;Michael Buzzelli","doi":"10.1111/grow.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic resilience focuses on how localities react and respond to shocks. A recent conceptual advancement, known as the agency perspective and rooted in evolutionary thinking, highlights that economic actors (e.g., practitioners, firms, and institutions) play an essential role in localities' resilience. However, empirical investigations into the role of economic actors have been scarce. To address this shortcoming, in this study we conducted in-depth interviews with 22 practitioners (economic development officials) from various cities in Ontario, Canada. Through an evolutionary lens, we examine practitioners' perceptions of and responses to endogenous shocks—notably, major industrial plant closures over the past 20 years. We find that practitioners influence localities' resilience through each dimension of the resilience process. Most notably, they support their localities' adaption through various short- and long-term adaptive strategies. Also, we find that economic actors have different capacities and resources at their disposal to respond to shocks depending on the size of their city and its geographical location. Regarding the latter, we reiterate a commonly noted north-south divide in the province. In addition, we find that economic actors are constrained by multi-scalar policies, and thus operate in the confines of existing power and political structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grow.12716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practitioners' ability to retool the economy: The role of agency in local economic resilience to plant closures in Ontario\",\"authors\":\"Jesse Sutton,&nbsp;Godwin Arku,&nbsp;Richard Sadler,&nbsp;John Hutchenreuther,&nbsp;Michael Buzzelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/grow.12716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Economic resilience focuses on how localities react and respond to shocks. A recent conceptual advancement, known as the agency perspective and rooted in evolutionary thinking, highlights that economic actors (e.g., practitioners, firms, and institutions) play an essential role in localities' resilience. However, empirical investigations into the role of economic actors have been scarce. To address this shortcoming, in this study we conducted in-depth interviews with 22 practitioners (economic development officials) from various cities in Ontario, Canada. Through an evolutionary lens, we examine practitioners' perceptions of and responses to endogenous shocks—notably, major industrial plant closures over the past 20 years. We find that practitioners influence localities' resilience through each dimension of the resilience process. Most notably, they support their localities' adaption through various short- and long-term adaptive strategies. Also, we find that economic actors have different capacities and resources at their disposal to respond to shocks depending on the size of their city and its geographical location. Regarding the latter, we reiterate a commonly noted north-south divide in the province. In addition, we find that economic actors are constrained by multi-scalar policies, and thus operate in the confines of existing power and political structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Growth and Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grow.12716\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Growth and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.12716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.12716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济复原力侧重于地方如何对冲击做出反应和应对。最近的一个概念进步,即代理视角,植根于进化论思想,强调经济行为者(如从业者、公司和机构)在地方的复原力中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,对经济行为者作用的实证调查却很少。为了弥补这一不足,在本研究中,我们对来自加拿大安大略省多个城市的 22 名从业人员(经济发展官员)进行了深入访谈。通过进化论的视角,我们考察了从业人员对内生冲击的看法和应对措施--尤其是过去 20 年中主要工业工厂的关闭。我们发现,从业人员通过复原过程的每个维度影响着当地的复原力。最值得注意的是,他们通过各种短期和长期的适应性战略来支持当地的适应性。此外,我们还发现,根据城市规模和地理位置的不同,经济行为者在应对冲击时可支配的能力和资源也不同。关于后者,我们重申了该省普遍存在的南北差距。此外,我们还发现,经济行为体受到多层次政策的制约,因此在现有权力和政治结构的限制下运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practitioners' ability to retool the economy: The role of agency in local economic resilience to plant closures in Ontario

Economic resilience focuses on how localities react and respond to shocks. A recent conceptual advancement, known as the agency perspective and rooted in evolutionary thinking, highlights that economic actors (e.g., practitioners, firms, and institutions) play an essential role in localities' resilience. However, empirical investigations into the role of economic actors have been scarce. To address this shortcoming, in this study we conducted in-depth interviews with 22 practitioners (economic development officials) from various cities in Ontario, Canada. Through an evolutionary lens, we examine practitioners' perceptions of and responses to endogenous shocks—notably, major industrial plant closures over the past 20 years. We find that practitioners influence localities' resilience through each dimension of the resilience process. Most notably, they support their localities' adaption through various short- and long-term adaptive strategies. Also, we find that economic actors have different capacities and resources at their disposal to respond to shocks depending on the size of their city and its geographical location. Regarding the latter, we reiterate a commonly noted north-south divide in the province. In addition, we find that economic actors are constrained by multi-scalar policies, and thus operate in the confines of existing power and political structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Cohesion Funds on Convergence Club's Economic Growth Did the U.S. Fracking Boom Shale-Shock Regional Patenting? Intangible Capital as a Driver of Labor Productivity in Regions and Industries: Evidence of the Spanish Case Correction to “Trajectory and Cluster Resilience Elements: The Case of the Brazilian Wine Cluster of the Serra Gaúcha” Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1