中国的加工出口与企业社保缴费:供应链压力的作用

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Asian Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101718
Yanzhe Zhang , Helian Xu
{"title":"中国的加工出口与企业社保缴费:供应链压力的作用","authors":"Yanzhe Zhang ,&nbsp;Helian Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the effects of processing export on firms’ social security contributions. A consistent pattern emerges that processing exporters in China exhibit higher actual contributions relative to ordinary exporters. This finding is intriguing, as processing exporters have been found to be inferior on various margins, such as wages and productivity. We propose and test a potential mechanism from a labor standard perspective, supply chain pressure, where processing exporters are compelled by downstream importers to adhere to certain codes of conduct in order to avoid reputation damages. We discuss endogeneity problems arising from various sources that may affect the validity of the proposed mechanism, and adopt instrumental variable estimation to address any unobserved concerns. Moreover, despite the unquantifiability of supply chain pressure, supportive evidence is found as pure-assemblers, processing exporters in high-exposure industries, those with destinations in developed countries and those in export-intensive regions exhibit relatively higher contributions, as predicted by the theory. These findings also negate competing hypotheses from the traditional labor cost perspective. Furthermore, non-state-owned, small, and low-paying firms are more susceptible to supply chain pressure than their respective counterparts. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the behavioral differences between processing and ordinary exporters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processing export and firms’ social security contributions in China: The role of supply chain pressure\",\"authors\":\"Yanzhe Zhang ,&nbsp;Helian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the effects of processing export on firms’ social security contributions. A consistent pattern emerges that processing exporters in China exhibit higher actual contributions relative to ordinary exporters. This finding is intriguing, as processing exporters have been found to be inferior on various margins, such as wages and productivity. We propose and test a potential mechanism from a labor standard perspective, supply chain pressure, where processing exporters are compelled by downstream importers to adhere to certain codes of conduct in order to avoid reputation damages. We discuss endogeneity problems arising from various sources that may affect the validity of the proposed mechanism, and adopt instrumental variable estimation to address any unobserved concerns. Moreover, despite the unquantifiability of supply chain pressure, supportive evidence is found as pure-assemblers, processing exporters in high-exposure industries, those with destinations in developed countries and those in export-intensive regions exhibit relatively higher contributions, as predicted by the theory. These findings also negate competing hypotheses from the traditional labor cost perspective. Furthermore, non-state-owned, small, and low-paying firms are more susceptible to supply chain pressure than their respective counterparts. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the behavioral differences between processing and ordinary exporters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了加工出口对企业社保缴费的影响。结果显示,中国加工出口企业的实际缴费额高于普通出口企业。这一发现耐人寻味,因为人们发现加工出口企业在工资和生产率等各方面都处于劣势。我们从劳动标准的角度提出并检验了一种潜在的机制--供应链压力,即下游进口商迫使加工出口企业遵守某些行为准则,以避免声誉受损。我们讨论了可能影响拟议机制有效性的各种来源的内生性问题,并采用工具变量估计法来解决任何未观察到的问题。此外,尽管供应链压力无法量化,但我们还是发现了支持性证据,因为纯装配商、高曝光率行业的加工出口商、目的地在发达国家的出口商以及出口密集型地区的出口商表现出相对较高的贡献,正如理论所预测的那样。这些发现也否定了从传统劳动力成本角度提出的竞争性假设。此外,非国有企业、小型企业和低薪企业比其同行更容易受到供应链压力的影响。我们的研究结果有助于更好地理解加工型出口企业与普通出口企业之间的行为差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Processing export and firms’ social security contributions in China: The role of supply chain pressure

This paper investigates the effects of processing export on firms’ social security contributions. A consistent pattern emerges that processing exporters in China exhibit higher actual contributions relative to ordinary exporters. This finding is intriguing, as processing exporters have been found to be inferior on various margins, such as wages and productivity. We propose and test a potential mechanism from a labor standard perspective, supply chain pressure, where processing exporters are compelled by downstream importers to adhere to certain codes of conduct in order to avoid reputation damages. We discuss endogeneity problems arising from various sources that may affect the validity of the proposed mechanism, and adopt instrumental variable estimation to address any unobserved concerns. Moreover, despite the unquantifiability of supply chain pressure, supportive evidence is found as pure-assemblers, processing exporters in high-exposure industries, those with destinations in developed countries and those in export-intensive regions exhibit relatively higher contributions, as predicted by the theory. These findings also negate competing hypotheses from the traditional labor cost perspective. Furthermore, non-state-owned, small, and low-paying firms are more susceptible to supply chain pressure than their respective counterparts. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the behavioral differences between processing and ordinary exporters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Economics provides a forum for publication of increasingly growing research in Asian economic studies and a unique forum for continental Asian economic studies with focus on (i) special studies in adaptive innovation paradigms in Asian economic regimes, (ii) studies relative to unique dimensions of Asian economic development paradigm, as they are investigated by researchers, (iii) comparative studies of development paradigms in other developing continents, Latin America and Africa, (iv) the emerging new pattern of comparative advantages between Asian countries and the United States and North America.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of digital transformation on firm resilience: Evidence from China Impact of city size on self-employment behavior: Evidence from Chinese migrants The clan imprint within gender wage gap: Evidence from China Editorial Board Government relocation and air pollution: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1