设定我们的界限:性别、价值观和角色显著性在工作与家庭边界渗透性中的作用

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1111/joop.12498
Faezeh Amirkamali, Wendy J. Casper, Shelia A. Hyde, Julie Holliday Wayne, Hoda Vaziri
{"title":"设定我们的界限:性别、价值观和角色显著性在工作与家庭边界渗透性中的作用","authors":"Faezeh Amirkamali,&nbsp;Wendy J. Casper,&nbsp;Shelia A. Hyde,&nbsp;Julie Holliday Wayne,&nbsp;Hoda Vaziri","doi":"10.1111/joop.12498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although women make up nearly half of the U.S. workforce, gender role stereotypes persist, and gender roles may relate to how men and women manage work–home boundaries. In this study, we explore gender differences in how employee values (tradition, achievement) translate into role identity salience, and in turn, boundary management preferences and behaviour. With data collected in two waves from 200 employees, we examined how the personal values of tradition and achievement relate differently by gender to role identity salience and in turn, boundary management. We found that men who more strongly value tradition have higher levels of work identity salience and both prefer and create an impermeable boundary around work to prevent intrusion from home. Men who valued tradition more also preferred and crafted a permeable home boundary to allow work intrusion. In contrast, women with higher tradition values reported higher home identity salience, which was associated with preferring segmentation in both work-to-home and home-to-work directions, and to behaviorally protecting home from work. Contrary to expectations, achievement values did not relate to a boundary management process via role identity salience for either gender. We discuss implications for a more nuanced, values-driven, and gendered perspective on boundary management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting our boundaries: The role of gender, values, and role salience in work–home boundary permeability\",\"authors\":\"Faezeh Amirkamali,&nbsp;Wendy J. Casper,&nbsp;Shelia A. Hyde,&nbsp;Julie Holliday Wayne,&nbsp;Hoda Vaziri\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joop.12498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although women make up nearly half of the U.S. workforce, gender role stereotypes persist, and gender roles may relate to how men and women manage work–home boundaries. In this study, we explore gender differences in how employee values (tradition, achievement) translate into role identity salience, and in turn, boundary management preferences and behaviour. With data collected in two waves from 200 employees, we examined how the personal values of tradition and achievement relate differently by gender to role identity salience and in turn, boundary management. We found that men who more strongly value tradition have higher levels of work identity salience and both prefer and create an impermeable boundary around work to prevent intrusion from home. Men who valued tradition more also preferred and crafted a permeable home boundary to allow work intrusion. In contrast, women with higher tradition values reported higher home identity salience, which was associated with preferring segmentation in both work-to-home and home-to-work directions, and to behaviorally protecting home from work. Contrary to expectations, achievement values did not relate to a boundary management process via role identity salience for either gender. We discuss implications for a more nuanced, values-driven, and gendered perspective on boundary management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管女性占美国劳动力的近一半,但性别角色定型观念依然存在,性别角色可能与男性和女性如何处理工作与家庭的界限有关。在本研究中,我们探讨了员工价值观(传统、成就)如何转化为角色认同显著性,进而转化为边界管理偏好和行为的性别差异。我们分两次收集了 200 名员工的数据,研究了不同性别的个人价值观(传统和成就)与角色认同显著性的关系,进而研究了边界管理。我们发现,更重视传统的男性具有更高水平的工作身份突出性,他们更喜欢并在工作周围建立一个不可渗透的边界,以防止来自家庭的侵扰。更看重传统的男性也更喜欢并精心设计一个可渗透的家庭边界,以允许工作入侵。与此相反,传统价值观较高的女性对家的认同感较强,这与她们更倾向于在工作与家和家与工作两个方向上进行分割,并在行为上保护家不受工作的影响有关。与预期相反的是,成就价值观并没有通过角色认同显著性与任何性别的边界管理过程相关联。我们讨论了从更细致入微、价值观驱动和性别角度看待边界管理的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Setting our boundaries: The role of gender, values, and role salience in work–home boundary permeability

Although women make up nearly half of the U.S. workforce, gender role stereotypes persist, and gender roles may relate to how men and women manage work–home boundaries. In this study, we explore gender differences in how employee values (tradition, achievement) translate into role identity salience, and in turn, boundary management preferences and behaviour. With data collected in two waves from 200 employees, we examined how the personal values of tradition and achievement relate differently by gender to role identity salience and in turn, boundary management. We found that men who more strongly value tradition have higher levels of work identity salience and both prefer and create an impermeable boundary around work to prevent intrusion from home. Men who valued tradition more also preferred and crafted a permeable home boundary to allow work intrusion. In contrast, women with higher tradition values reported higher home identity salience, which was associated with preferring segmentation in both work-to-home and home-to-work directions, and to behaviorally protecting home from work. Contrary to expectations, achievement values did not relate to a boundary management process via role identity salience for either gender. We discuss implications for a more nuanced, values-driven, and gendered perspective on boundary management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1