加拿大安大略省随时间变化的医生 SARS-CoV-2 感染情况:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-29
Steven Habbous, Natasha Saunders, Kelvin Kw Chan, Susy Hota, Jonathan Wang, David Messenger, Erik Hellsten
{"title":"加拿大安大略省随时间变化的医生 SARS-CoV-2 感染情况:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Steven Habbous, Natasha Saunders, Kelvin Kw Chan, Susy Hota, Jonathan Wang, David Messenger, Erik Hellsten","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess this risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Ontario physicians by specialty and in comparison with non-physician controls during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, the primary outcome was incident SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Secondary outcomes were hospitalization, use of critical care, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022, 6172/30 617 (20%) active Ontario physicians tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Infection was less likely if physicians were older (OR 0.78 [0.76-0.81] per 10 years), rural residents (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and lived in more marginalized neighborhoods (OR 0.74 [0.62-0.89]), but more likely if they were female (OR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]), worked in long-term care settings (OR 1.16 [1.02-1.32]), had higher patient volumes (OR 2.05 [1.82-2.30] for highest vs lowest), and were pediatricians (OR 1.25 [1.09-1.44]). Compared with community-matched controls (n=29 763), physicians had a higher risk of infection during the first two waves of the pandemic (OR 1.38 [1.20-1.59]) but by wave 3 the risk was no longer significantly different (OR 0.93 [0.83-1.05]). Physicians were less likely to be hospitalized within 14 days of their first positive PCR test than non-physicians (P<0.0001), but there was no difference in the use of critical care (P=0.48) or mortality (P=0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians had higher rates of infection than community-matched controls during the first two waves of the pandemic in Ontario, but not from wave 3 onward. Physicians practicing in long-term care facilities and pediatricians were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than other physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":"30-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 infection among physicians over time in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Habbous, Natasha Saunders, Kelvin Kw Chan, Susy Hota, Jonathan Wang, David Messenger, Erik Hellsten\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess this risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Ontario physicians by specialty and in comparison with non-physician controls during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, the primary outcome was incident SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Secondary outcomes were hospitalization, use of critical care, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022, 6172/30 617 (20%) active Ontario physicians tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Infection was less likely if physicians were older (OR 0.78 [0.76-0.81] per 10 years), rural residents (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and lived in more marginalized neighborhoods (OR 0.74 [0.62-0.89]), but more likely if they were female (OR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]), worked in long-term care settings (OR 1.16 [1.02-1.32]), had higher patient volumes (OR 2.05 [1.82-2.30] for highest vs lowest), and were pediatricians (OR 1.25 [1.09-1.44]). Compared with community-matched controls (n=29 763), physicians had a higher risk of infection during the first two waves of the pandemic (OR 1.38 [1.20-1.59]) but by wave 3 the risk was no longer significantly different (OR 0.93 [0.83-1.05]). Physicians were less likely to be hospitalized within 14 days of their first positive PCR test than non-physicians (P<0.0001), but there was no difference in the use of critical care (P=0.48) or mortality (P=0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians had higher rates of infection than community-matched controls during the first two waves of the pandemic in Ontario, but not from wave 3 onward. Physicians practicing in long-term care facilities and pediatricians were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than other physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"30-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 COVID-19 大流行期间安大略省各专业医生感染 SARS-CoV-2 的风险,并与非医生对照组进行比较:在这项回顾性队列研究中,主要结果是经聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 证实的 SARS-CoV-2 感染事件。次要结果是住院、使用重症监护和死亡率:从 2020 年 3 月 1 日到 2022 年 12 月 31 日,6172/30 617 名(20%)安大略省在职医生的 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性。年龄较大(OR 0.78 [0.76-0.81] 每 10 年)、农村居民(OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83])和居住在较边缘化社区(OR 0.74 [0.62-0.89])的医生感染的可能性较低,但女性医生感染的可能性较高(OR 1.14 [1.07-1.22])、在长期护理机构工作(OR 1.16 [1.02-1.32])、病人数量较多(最高与最低的 OR 值为 2.05 [1.82-2.30])以及是儿科医生(OR 1.25 [1.09-1.44])。与社区匹配对照组(n=29 763)相比,在大流行的前两波中,医生的感染风险较高(OR 1.38 [1.20-1.59]),但到了第三波,这种风险不再有显著差异(OR 0.93 [0.83-1.05])。与非医生相比,医生在首次 PCR 检测呈阳性后 14 天内住院的可能性较低(结论:医生的感染率高于社区医生):在安大略省大流行的前两波中,医生的感染率高于社区匹配的对照组,但从第三波开始,医生的感染率不再高于社区匹配的对照组。在长期护理机构工作的医生和儿科医生比其他医生更有可能检测出 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 infection among physicians over time in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Aim: To assess this risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Ontario physicians by specialty and in comparison with non-physician controls during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the primary outcome was incident SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Secondary outcomes were hospitalization, use of critical care, and mortality.

Results: From March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022, 6172/30 617 (20%) active Ontario physicians tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Infection was less likely if physicians were older (OR 0.78 [0.76-0.81] per 10 years), rural residents (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and lived in more marginalized neighborhoods (OR 0.74 [0.62-0.89]), but more likely if they were female (OR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]), worked in long-term care settings (OR 1.16 [1.02-1.32]), had higher patient volumes (OR 2.05 [1.82-2.30] for highest vs lowest), and were pediatricians (OR 1.25 [1.09-1.44]). Compared with community-matched controls (n=29 763), physicians had a higher risk of infection during the first two waves of the pandemic (OR 1.38 [1.20-1.59]) but by wave 3 the risk was no longer significantly different (OR 0.93 [0.83-1.05]). Physicians were less likely to be hospitalized within 14 days of their first positive PCR test than non-physicians (P<0.0001), but there was no difference in the use of critical care (P=0.48) or mortality (P=0.15).

Conclusion: Physicians had higher rates of infection than community-matched controls during the first two waves of the pandemic in Ontario, but not from wave 3 onward. Physicians practicing in long-term care facilities and pediatricians were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than other physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study. Control values of intraocular pressure in different species: a review of literature. Alcohol use among Croatian adolescents: the alignment of 13-year-old and 15-year-old girls with boys, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral correlates of health literacy among university students of health sciences in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study. Editors' role in shaping the publishing environment and guiding authors in the era of artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1