Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes
{"title":"阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利生物仿制药定价的跨国比较。","authors":"Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生物仿制药是指与已获许可的生物制品(RP)高度相似的生物制品。生物仿制药进入市场有望降低生物治疗的成本:本研究旨在评估生物仿制药价格与四个国家批准的相应生物制品 RP 之间的差异范围:本研究对阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利的生物仿制药定价进行了跨国比较。研究考察了调查国家的国家主管部门提供的在线价格数据库。生物仿制药价格差异的计算方法是将生物仿制药的单价减去研究用药的单价,再除以研究用药的单价。结果以百分比表示:结果:巴西的生物仿制药价格下降中位数最高(-36.3%),其次是意大利(-20.0%)和阿根廷(-18.6%)。意大利所有生物仿制药的价格都低于零售价,最低降幅为 6.3%,而在澳大利亚,大多数生物仿制药的价格都与零售价持平。在阿根廷,一种英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的价格高于参考值(40.7%),而价格较低的品牌则降低了 14.4%。巴西有四种生物仿制药的价格高于各自的零售价,包括异芬胰岛素(1)、格列奈胰岛素(1)和索马托品(2):这项研究表明,在所研究的国家中,生物仿制药与原研药之间的价格差异非常明显。各国政府应评估其政策是否成功地提高了生物疗法的可负担性。
A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.
Background: Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.
Method: This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.
Results: Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).
Conclusion: The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.