{"title":"英语比较情态及其补语","authors":"JOANNA NYKIEL, JACOB THAISEN","doi":"10.1017/s1360674323000485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs <jats:italic>rather</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>sooner</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>better</jats:italic> with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than <jats:sc>better</jats:sc>. However, potential differences in the syntax of <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc>. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> differs from <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.","PeriodicalId":45748,"journal":{"name":"English Language & Linguistics","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English comparative modals and their complements\",\"authors\":\"JOANNA NYKIEL, JACOB THAISEN\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1360674323000485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs <jats:italic>rather</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>sooner</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>better</jats:italic> with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than <jats:sc>better</jats:sc>. However, potential differences in the syntax of <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc>. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> differs from <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674323000485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674323000485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs rather, sooner and better with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals rather and sooner have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than better. However, potential differences in the syntax of rather and sooner with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that rather patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for sooner. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that rather differs from sooner in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.
期刊介绍:
English Language and Linguistics, published twice a year, is an international journal which focuses on the description of the English language within the framework of contemporary linguistics. The journal is concerned equally with the synchronic and the diachronic aspects of English language studies and publishes articles of the highest quality which make a substantial contribution to our understanding of the structure and development of the English language and which are informed by a knowledge and appreciation of linguistic theory. English Language and Linguistics carries articles and short discussion papers or squibs on all core aspects of English, from its beginnings to the present day, including syntax, morphology, phonology, semantics, pragmatics, corpus linguistics and lexis.