英语比较情态及其补语

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS English Language & Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1017/s1360674323000485
JOANNA NYKIEL, JACOB THAISEN
{"title":"英语比较情态及其补语","authors":"JOANNA NYKIEL, JACOB THAISEN","doi":"10.1017/s1360674323000485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs <jats:italic>rather</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>sooner</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>better</jats:italic> with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than <jats:sc>better</jats:sc>. However, potential differences in the syntax of <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc>. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> differs from <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.","PeriodicalId":45748,"journal":{"name":"English Language & Linguistics","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English comparative modals and their complements\",\"authors\":\"JOANNA NYKIEL, JACOB THAISEN\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1360674323000485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs <jats:italic>rather</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>sooner</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>better</jats:italic> with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than <jats:sc>better</jats:sc>. However, potential differences in the syntax of <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc>. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that <jats:sc>rather</jats:sc> differs from <jats:sc>sooner</jats:sc> in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674323000485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674323000485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语比较语气词是副词 rather、 sooner 和 better 与助词的组合。最近有一种共识认为,比较语气词 rather 和 sooner 随着时间的推移发展出了与 better 不同的语法和语义。然而,"宁可 "和 "早点 "的句法在补语模式方面的潜在差异尚未得到探讨。本文报告了对这两个情态动词进行语料库研究的结果,发现 "宁 "的模式像宾语前置动词,允许一系列补语,而 "早 "则不允许这些补语。我们对这些模式的分析借鉴了构式语法框架的最新研究成果,并对其正式实现--基于符号的构式语法--进行了尝试。我们提出,"宁愿 "与 "更快 "的不同之处在于,它构成了一种微构式,其特征得到了模态构式和宾语提升构式的许可,后者是及物构式的一种子类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
English comparative modals and their complements
English comparative modals are combinations of the adverbs rather, sooner and better with an auxiliary. There is recent consensus that the comparative modals rather and sooner have over time developed a different syntax and semantics than better. However, potential differences in the syntax of rather and sooner with respect to patterns of complementation haven’t been explored. This article reports the results of a corpus study of these two modals and finds that rather patterns like object-raising verbs, allowing a range of complements that are unavailable for sooner. Our analysis of these patterns draws on recent work in the Construction Grammar framework, with forays into its formal implementation, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, and we propose that rather differs from sooner in that it constitutes a micro-construction whose features are licensed by both the Modal Construction and the Object-Raising Construction, the latter a subtype of the Transitive Construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: English Language and Linguistics, published twice a year, is an international journal which focuses on the description of the English language within the framework of contemporary linguistics. The journal is concerned equally with the synchronic and the diachronic aspects of English language studies and publishes articles of the highest quality which make a substantial contribution to our understanding of the structure and development of the English language and which are informed by a knowledge and appreciation of linguistic theory. English Language and Linguistics carries articles and short discussion papers or squibs on all core aspects of English, from its beginnings to the present day, including syntax, morphology, phonology, semantics, pragmatics, corpus linguistics and lexis.
期刊最新文献
Loan verb accommodation: a comparison of Old Norse and French in Middle English ‘When intuitions (don't) fail’: combining syntax and sociolinguistics in the analysis of Scots Morphosyntactic agreement in English: does it help the listener in noise? An exploratory investigation of functional variation in South Asian online Englishes A topic which I want to know more about – preposition placement in finite WH-relative clauses in World Englishes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1