{"title":"脑卒中急性期后患者常规临床评估结果--十项目版(CORE-10)的可靠性、有效性和临床实用性。","authors":"Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake","doi":"10.1177/02692155241236602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (<i>SD</i> = 3.12, <i>Mdn</i> = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from <i>r</i> = .49 to <i>r</i> = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241236602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (<i>SD</i> = 3.12, <i>Mdn</i> = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from <i>r</i> = .49 to <i>r</i> = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.
Objective: To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.
Setting: A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.
Participants: A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.
Main measures: Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.
Results: To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (SD = 3.12, Mdn = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from r = .49 to r = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.
Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)