脑卒中急性期后患者常规临床评估结果--十项目版(CORE-10)的可靠性、有效性和临床实用性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/02692155241236602
Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake
{"title":"脑卒中急性期后患者常规临床评估结果--十项目版(CORE-10)的可靠性、有效性和临床实用性。","authors":"Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake","doi":"10.1177/02692155241236602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (<i>SD</i> = 3.12, <i>Mdn</i> = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from <i>r</i> = .49 to <i>r</i> = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241236602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (<i>SD</i> = 3.12, <i>Mdn</i> = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from <i>r</i> = .49 to <i>r</i> = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在中风住院病人样本中探索常规评估中临床结果--十项目版(CORE-10:用于测量心理困扰的十项目问卷)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性,并计算可靠且具有临床意义的变化分数:环境:英格兰东部的一个急性中风后康复病房:共有 53 名中风患者,能够完成 CORE-10 作为常规临床评估的一部分。排除标准包括中度至重度失语和/或失读症:除 CORE-10 外,患者健康问卷 - 9、医院焦虑抑郁量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和贝克抑郁量表第二版也被用作并行测量:为了评估可靠性,计算了 CORE-10 的内部一致性和测试-再测可靠性。CORE-10 测试-重测之间的平均间隔天数为 2.84 天(SD = 3.12,Mdn = 1)。并发效度是通过考察CORE-10与可比测量之间的相关性来评估的,临床效用则是根据伯顿和泰森(2015)的标准来评估的。CORE-10 的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)为 0.80,测试-再测试可靠性的类间相关系数为 0.81。CORE-10 与并行测量的总分相关系数从 r = .49 到 r = .89。CORE-10 在临床实用性标准上达到了最高分(即 6/6)。计算表明,CORE-10 的可靠变化指数为 9 分,具有临床意义的变化切点为 12 分。报告了 CORE-10 总分的百分位数:本研究为 CORE-10 提供了初步支持,认为它是一种有效、可靠的测量方法,在筛查脑卒中住院患者的痛苦方面具有临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.

Objective: To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.

Setting: A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.

Participants: A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.

Main measures: Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.

Results: To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (SD = 3.12, Mdn = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from r = .49 to r = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Patients' and staffs' experiences of clinical support after a lower limb reconstruction: An interview study. Physiotherapy of the Trunk Related to Sitting Function After Stroke: A Delphi Study. The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties. An economic evaluation of pre-discharge home assessment visits following hip fracture: Analysis from a randomised controlled trial. Letter to the editor: In radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, energy matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1