生物膜形成鲍曼不动杆菌对抗生素和消毒剂的敏感性特征:重点关注环境分离物。

European journal of microbiology & immunology Pub Date : 2024-03-05 Print Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1556/1886.2024.00014
Péter Pallós, Márió Gajdács, Edit Urbán, Yvett Szabados, Klaudia Szalai, Lívia Hevesi, Anna Horváth, Anna Kuklis, Devina Morjaria, Wajiha Iffat, Helal F Hetta, Nicola Piredda, Matthew Gavino Donadu
{"title":"生物膜形成鲍曼不动杆菌对抗生素和消毒剂的敏感性特征:重点关注环境分离物。","authors":"Péter Pallós, Márió Gajdács, Edit Urbán, Yvett Szabados, Klaudia Szalai, Lívia Hevesi, Anna Horváth, Anna Kuklis, Devina Morjaria, Wajiha Iffat, Helal F Hetta, Nicola Piredda, Matthew Gavino Donadu","doi":"10.1556/1886.2024.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical role of Acinetobacter baumannii has been highlighted in numerous infectious syndromes with a high mortality rate, due to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The treatment and eradication of this pathogen is hindered by biofilm-formation, providing protection from noxious environmental factors and antimicrobials. The aim of this study was to assess the antibiotic susceptibility, antiseptic susceptibility and biofilm-forming capacity using phenotypic methods in environmental A. baumannii isolates. One hundred and fourteen (n = 114) isolates were collected, originating from various environmental sources and geographical regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method, while antiseptic susceptibility was performed using the agar dilution method. Determination of biofilm-forming capacity was carried out using a microtiter-plate based method. Resistance in environmental A. baumannii isolates were highest for ciprofloxacin (64.03%, n = 73), levofloxacin (62.18%, n = 71) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (61.40%, n = 70), while lowest for colistin (1.75%, n = 2). Efflux pump overexpression was seen in 48.25% of isolates (n = 55), 49.12% (n = 56) were classified as MDR. 6.14% (n = 7), 9.65% (n = 11), 24.65% (n = 28) and 59.65% (n = 68) of isolates were non-biofilm producers, weak, medium, and strong biofilm producers, respectively. No significant differences were observed between non-MDR vs. MDR isolates regarding their distribution of biofilm-producers (P = 0.655). The MIC ranges for the tested antiseptics were as follows: benzalkonium chloride 16-128 μg mL-1, chlorhexidine digluconate 4-128 μg mL-1, formaldehyde 64-256 μg mL-1 and triclosan 2-16 μg mL-1, respectively. The conscientious use of antiseptics, together with periodic surveillance, is essential to curb the spread of these bacteria, and to maintain current infection prevention capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93998,"journal":{"name":"European journal of microbiology & immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility in biofilm-forming Acinetobacter baumannii: A focus on environmental isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Péter Pallós, Márió Gajdács, Edit Urbán, Yvett Szabados, Klaudia Szalai, Lívia Hevesi, Anna Horváth, Anna Kuklis, Devina Morjaria, Wajiha Iffat, Helal F Hetta, Nicola Piredda, Matthew Gavino Donadu\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1886.2024.00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical role of Acinetobacter baumannii has been highlighted in numerous infectious syndromes with a high mortality rate, due to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The treatment and eradication of this pathogen is hindered by biofilm-formation, providing protection from noxious environmental factors and antimicrobials. The aim of this study was to assess the antibiotic susceptibility, antiseptic susceptibility and biofilm-forming capacity using phenotypic methods in environmental A. baumannii isolates. One hundred and fourteen (n = 114) isolates were collected, originating from various environmental sources and geographical regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method, while antiseptic susceptibility was performed using the agar dilution method. Determination of biofilm-forming capacity was carried out using a microtiter-plate based method. Resistance in environmental A. baumannii isolates were highest for ciprofloxacin (64.03%, n = 73), levofloxacin (62.18%, n = 71) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (61.40%, n = 70), while lowest for colistin (1.75%, n = 2). Efflux pump overexpression was seen in 48.25% of isolates (n = 55), 49.12% (n = 56) were classified as MDR. 6.14% (n = 7), 9.65% (n = 11), 24.65% (n = 28) and 59.65% (n = 68) of isolates were non-biofilm producers, weak, medium, and strong biofilm producers, respectively. No significant differences were observed between non-MDR vs. MDR isolates regarding their distribution of biofilm-producers (P = 0.655). The MIC ranges for the tested antiseptics were as follows: benzalkonium chloride 16-128 μg mL-1, chlorhexidine digluconate 4-128 μg mL-1, formaldehyde 64-256 μg mL-1 and triclosan 2-16 μg mL-1, respectively. The conscientious use of antiseptics, together with periodic surveillance, is essential to curb the spread of these bacteria, and to maintain current infection prevention capabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of microbiology & immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of microbiology & immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2024.00014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of microbiology & immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2024.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于耐多药(MDR)分离菌的高流行率,鲍曼不动杆菌在许多死亡率很高的感染综合症中的临床作用得到了强调。生物膜的形成阻碍了对这种病原体的治疗和根除,因为生物膜提供了免受有害环境因素和抗菌药物影响的保护。本研究旨在使用表型方法评估环境中鲍曼尼氏菌分离物的抗生素敏感性、抗菌药敏感性和生物膜形成能力。研究收集了来自不同环境来源和地理区域的 114 个分离株。抗菌药敏感性测试采用磁盘扩散法,抗菌药敏感性测试采用琼脂稀释法。生物膜形成能力的测定采用基于微孔板的方法。环境中的鲍曼尼氏菌分离物对环丙沙星(64.03%,n = 73)、左氧氟沙星(62.18%,n = 71)和三甲双氨-磺胺甲噁唑(61.40%,n = 70)的耐药性最高,而对可乐定(1.75%,n = 2)的耐药性最低。48.25%的分离物(n = 55)出现外排泵过表达,49.12%(n = 56)被归类为 MDR。分别有 6.14%(n = 7)、9.65%(n = 11)、24.65%(n = 28)和 59.65%(n = 68)的分离株为非生物膜产生者、弱、中和强生物膜产生者。非 MDR 与 MDR 分离物之间的生物膜产生者分布无明显差异(P = 0.655)。受测消毒剂的 MIC 范围分别为:苯扎氯铵 16-128 μg mL-1、洗必泰二葡萄糖酸盐 4-128 μg mL-1、甲醛 64-256 μg mL-1 和三氯生 2-16 μg mL-1。认真使用消毒剂并定期进行监测,对于遏制这些细菌的传播和保持现有的感染预防能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility in biofilm-forming Acinetobacter baumannii: A focus on environmental isolates.

The clinical role of Acinetobacter baumannii has been highlighted in numerous infectious syndromes with a high mortality rate, due to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The treatment and eradication of this pathogen is hindered by biofilm-formation, providing protection from noxious environmental factors and antimicrobials. The aim of this study was to assess the antibiotic susceptibility, antiseptic susceptibility and biofilm-forming capacity using phenotypic methods in environmental A. baumannii isolates. One hundred and fourteen (n = 114) isolates were collected, originating from various environmental sources and geographical regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method, while antiseptic susceptibility was performed using the agar dilution method. Determination of biofilm-forming capacity was carried out using a microtiter-plate based method. Resistance in environmental A. baumannii isolates were highest for ciprofloxacin (64.03%, n = 73), levofloxacin (62.18%, n = 71) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (61.40%, n = 70), while lowest for colistin (1.75%, n = 2). Efflux pump overexpression was seen in 48.25% of isolates (n = 55), 49.12% (n = 56) were classified as MDR. 6.14% (n = 7), 9.65% (n = 11), 24.65% (n = 28) and 59.65% (n = 68) of isolates were non-biofilm producers, weak, medium, and strong biofilm producers, respectively. No significant differences were observed between non-MDR vs. MDR isolates regarding their distribution of biofilm-producers (P = 0.655). The MIC ranges for the tested antiseptics were as follows: benzalkonium chloride 16-128 μg mL-1, chlorhexidine digluconate 4-128 μg mL-1, formaldehyde 64-256 μg mL-1 and triclosan 2-16 μg mL-1, respectively. The conscientious use of antiseptics, together with periodic surveillance, is essential to curb the spread of these bacteria, and to maintain current infection prevention capabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allergens causing contact dermatitis of the feet: Investigation and analysis of allergic reaction causes. Antifungal potential, mechanism of action, and toxicity of 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives. Correlation of RND efflux pump expression and AdeRS mutations in tigecycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from Thai clinical isolates. Circulating dengue virus serotypes, demographics, and epidemiology in the 2023 dengue outbreak in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Morphological and immunological characterization of primary cultured chicken caecal epithelial cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1