测试简短注意力训练方案,防止恐惧诱导程序造成情绪困扰

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101956
Mikael Rubin
{"title":"测试简短注意力训练方案,防止恐惧诱导程序造成情绪困扰","authors":"Mikael Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Attentional hypervigilance to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an important topic to investigate. Efforts to leverage attention training to prevent PTSD have been promising but underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The current study tested whether Attention Bias Modification (ABM) prior to an emotion induction of fear could reduce self-reported fear and arousal compared to two control conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 86) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and randomized to receive either (1) ABM where they were directed towards fear related words on every trial; (2) Attention Control Training (ACT) where they were directed towards fear related words on 50% of trials; or (3) Neutral training where all words were neutral. Participants then completed a fear emotion induction (a 2-min video), reporting fear, arousal, and mood before and after the emotion induction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants in the ABM condition had lower fear compared to the Neutral condition <em>b</em> = 11.43, 95% CI (1.20, 21.65), <em>d</em> = 0.48. Participants in the ABM condition did not have lower fear compared to the ACT condition <em>b</em> = 9.75, 95% CI (−0.64, 19.96), <em>d</em> = 0.41. Importantly, attentional avoidance at baseline moderated the effect of condition for both fear and arousal; higher avoidance at baseline for the ABM condition was associated with lower fear and arousal after the emotion induction compared to the Neutral condition.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The sample size was relatively small and limited in diversity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings are the first experimental evidence showing that the benefit of ABM prior to a fearful experience may be in its reduction of the target emotion. Additionally, ABM may work best for those that demonstrate the most avoidance at baseline in their attention towards fearful stimuli.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing a brief attention training protocol to prevent emotional distress from a fear induction procedure\",\"authors\":\"Mikael Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Attentional hypervigilance to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an important topic to investigate. Efforts to leverage attention training to prevent PTSD have been promising but underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The current study tested whether Attention Bias Modification (ABM) prior to an emotion induction of fear could reduce self-reported fear and arousal compared to two control conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 86) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and randomized to receive either (1) ABM where they were directed towards fear related words on every trial; (2) Attention Control Training (ACT) where they were directed towards fear related words on 50% of trials; or (3) Neutral training where all words were neutral. Participants then completed a fear emotion induction (a 2-min video), reporting fear, arousal, and mood before and after the emotion induction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants in the ABM condition had lower fear compared to the Neutral condition <em>b</em> = 11.43, 95% CI (1.20, 21.65), <em>d</em> = 0.48. Participants in the ABM condition did not have lower fear compared to the ACT condition <em>b</em> = 9.75, 95% CI (−0.64, 19.96), <em>d</em> = 0.41. Importantly, attentional avoidance at baseline moderated the effect of condition for both fear and arousal; higher avoidance at baseline for the ABM condition was associated with lower fear and arousal after the emotion induction compared to the Neutral condition.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The sample size was relatively small and limited in diversity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings are the first experimental evidence showing that the benefit of ABM prior to a fearful experience may be in its reduction of the target emotion. Additionally, ABM may work best for those that demonstrate the most avoidance at baseline in their attention towards fearful stimuli.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791624000156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791624000156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者对威胁的过度警觉是一个重要的研究课题。利用注意力训练预防创伤后应激障碍的努力很有希望,但其潜在机制尚未完全阐明。本研究测试了与两种对照条件相比,在进行恐惧情绪诱导之前进行注意力偏差修正(ABM)是否能减少自我报告的恐惧和唤醒。方法从亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 中招募参与者(N = 86),并随机分配他们接受(1)注意力偏差修正(ABM),即在每次试验中都引导他们使用与恐惧相关的单词;(2)注意力控制训练(ACT),即在 50% 的试验中引导他们使用与恐惧相关的单词;或(3)中性训练,即所有单词都是中性的。然后,参与者完成恐惧情绪诱导(一段 2 分钟的视频),并在情绪诱导前后报告恐惧、唤醒和情绪。结果与中性条件相比,ABM 条件下参与者的恐惧感较低,b = 11.43,95% CI (1.20, 21.65),d = 0.48。与 ACT 条件相比,ABM 条件下的参与者的恐惧感并不低,b = 9.75,95% CI (-0.64, 19.96),d = 0.41。重要的是,基线时的注意回避调节了条件对恐惧和唤醒的影响;与中性条件相比,ABM 条件下基线时较高的回避与情绪诱导后较低的恐惧和唤醒相关。此外,ABM 对那些在基线时对恐惧刺激表现出最大回避的人可能最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing a brief attention training protocol to prevent emotional distress from a fear induction procedure

Background and objectives

Attentional hypervigilance to threat in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an important topic to investigate. Efforts to leverage attention training to prevent PTSD have been promising but underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The current study tested whether Attention Bias Modification (ABM) prior to an emotion induction of fear could reduce self-reported fear and arousal compared to two control conditions.

Methods

Participants (N = 86) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and randomized to receive either (1) ABM where they were directed towards fear related words on every trial; (2) Attention Control Training (ACT) where they were directed towards fear related words on 50% of trials; or (3) Neutral training where all words were neutral. Participants then completed a fear emotion induction (a 2-min video), reporting fear, arousal, and mood before and after the emotion induction.

Results

Participants in the ABM condition had lower fear compared to the Neutral condition b = 11.43, 95% CI (1.20, 21.65), d = 0.48. Participants in the ABM condition did not have lower fear compared to the ACT condition b = 9.75, 95% CI (−0.64, 19.96), d = 0.41. Importantly, attentional avoidance at baseline moderated the effect of condition for both fear and arousal; higher avoidance at baseline for the ABM condition was associated with lower fear and arousal after the emotion induction compared to the Neutral condition.

Limitations

The sample size was relatively small and limited in diversity.

Conclusions

These findings are the first experimental evidence showing that the benefit of ABM prior to a fearful experience may be in its reduction of the target emotion. Additionally, ABM may work best for those that demonstrate the most avoidance at baseline in their attention towards fearful stimuli.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Predictors of polyregulation and its effectiveness following exposure to One's most personally distressing intrusive thought Further analyses of appraisals of losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: A quasi-experimental investigation Ecological momentary assessment models trajectories of expectancy following exposure: A proof-of-concept pilot study Joint attention effect on irrelevant stimuli resistance in high functional autism and neurotypical adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1