反思性谈话中的教学取向:纵向追踪共同教学职前教师的反思

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2024.101283
Emir Ertunç Havadar
{"title":"反思性谈话中的教学取向:纵向追踪共同教学职前教师的反思","authors":"Emir Ertunç Havadar","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Teachers operationalize various strategies to deal with lack of student participation in classroom interaction. Using longitudinal conversation analysis, this study examines three pre-service teachers’ orientations to their co-teaching in their reflections. I describe how the co-teaching pre-service teachers problematize the lack of student participation and attempt to resolve it. For this purpose, they orient to a turn allocation strategy, individual nomination, to elicit responses to their unanswered questions. I focus on the emergence and routinization of this strategy in five weeks in their reflections. The co-teachers’ use of <em>we</em> language in reflection sessions established the strategy as a shared practice. On the other hand, they used first-person plural and second-person singular pronouns when divergences occurred among group members. The findings suggest reflective sessions that PSTs engage in are integral to their professional development. The findings bring insights into the understanding of collaborative decision-making in reflective talk sessions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orientations to teaching in reflective talk: Tracking co-teaching pre-service teachers’ reflections longitudinally\",\"authors\":\"Emir Ertunç Havadar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Teachers operationalize various strategies to deal with lack of student participation in classroom interaction. Using longitudinal conversation analysis, this study examines three pre-service teachers’ orientations to their co-teaching in their reflections. I describe how the co-teaching pre-service teachers problematize the lack of student participation and attempt to resolve it. For this purpose, they orient to a turn allocation strategy, individual nomination, to elicit responses to their unanswered questions. I focus on the emergence and routinization of this strategy in five weeks in their reflections. The co-teachers’ use of <em>we</em> language in reflection sessions established the strategy as a shared practice. On the other hand, they used first-person plural and second-person singular pronouns when divergences occurred among group members. The findings suggest reflective sessions that PSTs engage in are integral to their professional development. The findings bring insights into the understanding of collaborative decision-making in reflective talk sessions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对学生在课堂互动中参与度不高的问题,教师们采取了多种策略。本研究通过纵向对话分析,考察了三位职前教师在反思中对共同教学的定位。我描述了共同教学中职前教师如何将学生参与不足的问题问题化,并试图解决这一问题。为此,他们采用了一种轮流分配策略--个人提名,以引出对其未解答问题的回应。在他们的反思中,我重点关注了这一策略在五周内的出现和常规化。共同教师在反思中使用 "我们 "的语言,确立了这一策略的共同实践。另一方面,当小组成员之间出现分歧时,他们使用了第一人称复数和第二人称单数代词。研究结果表明,专业教师参与的反思会是其专业发展不可或缺的一部分。研究结果为理解反思性会谈中的合作决策提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Orientations to teaching in reflective talk: Tracking co-teaching pre-service teachers’ reflections longitudinally

Teachers operationalize various strategies to deal with lack of student participation in classroom interaction. Using longitudinal conversation analysis, this study examines three pre-service teachers’ orientations to their co-teaching in their reflections. I describe how the co-teaching pre-service teachers problematize the lack of student participation and attempt to resolve it. For this purpose, they orient to a turn allocation strategy, individual nomination, to elicit responses to their unanswered questions. I focus on the emergence and routinization of this strategy in five weeks in their reflections. The co-teachers’ use of we language in reflection sessions established the strategy as a shared practice. On the other hand, they used first-person plural and second-person singular pronouns when divergences occurred among group members. The findings suggest reflective sessions that PSTs engage in are integral to their professional development. The findings bring insights into the understanding of collaborative decision-making in reflective talk sessions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Language as a distinguishing feature or common ground? A participatory study on manifestations of intergroup relations in the lived experiences of multilingual students. Promoting humanizing, meaningful, and just language instruction for multilingual learners and their peers: A pedagogical vision illustrated by examples from practice Encouraging translanguaging in collaborative talk in EFL classrooms: An epistemic network comparative study Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1