探索美国国家公园露营者的首选和最大预订窗口:提高公平性的意义

IF 3 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Tourism and Hospitality Research Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1177/14673584241237442
William L. Rice, B. Derrick Taff, Sophie A. Morris, Bing Pan, Colby Parkinson, Peter Newman
{"title":"探索美国国家公园露营者的首选和最大预订窗口:提高公平性的意义","authors":"William L. Rice, B. Derrick Taff, Sophie A. Morris, Bing Pan, Colby Parkinson, Peter Newman","doi":"10.1177/14673584241237442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research note is to inform national park management regarding the strategies in rationing campsites in popular U.S. national park campgrounds and provide data-driven guidance for the design of more fair and equitable methods for distributing limited, highly demanded campsites. To explore preferences in campsite rationing techniques and preferred and maximum campsite booking windows, we collected survey data among randomly sampled onsite visitors in Grand Canyon National Park at scenic viewpoints and Mather Campground in 2023. The rationing technique with the highest level of positive support was advance reservation, followed by a combination of time frames for booking window (e.g., 6-month, 2- month, and 2-week) and a combination of rationing techniques (e.g., advance reservation and first-come, first-serve). Concerning fairness and equity, we found that respondents in higher annual household income groups had a longer maximum booking window, on average, than those in lower income groups. Thus, we discuss the merits of offering a diversity of booking windows to meet the needs of multiple groups, each with constrained booking horizons.","PeriodicalId":47333,"journal":{"name":"Tourism and Hospitality Research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explorations of preferred and maximum booking windows among U.S. national park campers: Implications for improved fairness\",\"authors\":\"William L. Rice, B. Derrick Taff, Sophie A. Morris, Bing Pan, Colby Parkinson, Peter Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14673584241237442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research note is to inform national park management regarding the strategies in rationing campsites in popular U.S. national park campgrounds and provide data-driven guidance for the design of more fair and equitable methods for distributing limited, highly demanded campsites. To explore preferences in campsite rationing techniques and preferred and maximum campsite booking windows, we collected survey data among randomly sampled onsite visitors in Grand Canyon National Park at scenic viewpoints and Mather Campground in 2023. The rationing technique with the highest level of positive support was advance reservation, followed by a combination of time frames for booking window (e.g., 6-month, 2- month, and 2-week) and a combination of rationing techniques (e.g., advance reservation and first-come, first-serve). Concerning fairness and equity, we found that respondents in higher annual household income groups had a longer maximum booking window, on average, than those in lower income groups. Thus, we discuss the merits of offering a diversity of booking windows to meet the needs of multiple groups, each with constrained booking horizons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism and Hospitality Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism and Hospitality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584241237442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism and Hospitality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584241237442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究报告旨在为国家公园管理部门提供有关美国国家公园热门露营地露营地配给策略的信息,并为设计更公平、更公正的方法分配有限且需求量大的露营地提供数据指导。为了探索露营地配给技术的偏好以及露营地预订的首选窗口和最大窗口,我们收集了 2023 年在大峡谷国家公园景区和马瑟露营地随机抽取的现场游客的调查数据。支持率最高的配给技术是提前预订,其次是预订窗口的时间范围组合(如 6 个月、2 个月和 2 周)和配给技术组合(如提前预订和先到先得)。在公平和公正方面,我们发现家庭年收入较高组别受访者的最长预订窗口期平均长于收入较低组别受访者。因此,我们讨论了提供多种预订窗口的好处,以满足预订时间有限的多个群体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explorations of preferred and maximum booking windows among U.S. national park campers: Implications for improved fairness
The purpose of this research note is to inform national park management regarding the strategies in rationing campsites in popular U.S. national park campgrounds and provide data-driven guidance for the design of more fair and equitable methods for distributing limited, highly demanded campsites. To explore preferences in campsite rationing techniques and preferred and maximum campsite booking windows, we collected survey data among randomly sampled onsite visitors in Grand Canyon National Park at scenic viewpoints and Mather Campground in 2023. The rationing technique with the highest level of positive support was advance reservation, followed by a combination of time frames for booking window (e.g., 6-month, 2- month, and 2-week) and a combination of rationing techniques (e.g., advance reservation and first-come, first-serve). Concerning fairness and equity, we found that respondents in higher annual household income groups had a longer maximum booking window, on average, than those in lower income groups. Thus, we discuss the merits of offering a diversity of booking windows to meet the needs of multiple groups, each with constrained booking horizons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism and Hospitality Research
Tourism and Hospitality Research HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Tourism and Hospitality Research is firmly established as a leading and authoritative, peer-reviewed journal for tourism and hospitality researchers and professionals. Tourism and Hospitality Research covers: • Hospitality and tourism operations • Marketing and consumer behaviour • HR management • Social Media and Marketing • Technology • Planning and development • Policy • Performance and financial management • Strategic implications • Environmental aspects • Forecasting and prediction • Revenue management • Impact assessment and mitigation • Globalisation • Research methodologies • Leisure and culture • Risk Management • Change Management
期刊最新文献
Understanding Booking.com’s rating drop in the context of online hotel reviews Promoting halal tourism in sharia-compliant destination: Insights on aceh competitiveness and tourist perceived value and behavior Hyperloop’s role in tourism and hospitality: Challenges and opportunities The tour guide profession: An attractive option for UAE nationals majoring in tourism? Tourism industrial convergence development: Residents’ attitude of Macau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1