Sara J Landes, Bridget B Matarazzo, Jeffery A Pitcock, Karen L Drummond, Brandy N Smith, JoAnn E Kirchner, Kaily A Clark, Georgia R Gerard, Molly C Jankovsky, Lisa A Brenner, Mark A Reger, Aaron E Eagan, Rebecca Raciborski, Jacob Painter, James C Townsend, Susan M Jegley, Rajinder Sonia Singh, Jodie A Trafton, John F McCarthy, Ira R Katz
{"title":"为有自杀风险的退伍军人实施 REACH VET 临床计划的促进作用。","authors":"Sara J Landes, Bridget B Matarazzo, Jeffery A Pitcock, Karen L Drummond, Brandy N Smith, JoAnn E Kirchner, Kaily A Clark, Georgia R Gerard, Molly C Jankovsky, Lisa A Brenner, Mark A Reger, Aaron E Eagan, Rebecca Raciborski, Jacob Painter, James C Townsend, Susan M Jegley, Rajinder Sonia Singh, Jodie A Trafton, John F McCarthy, Ira R Katz","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national suicide prevention program, called Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), that uses a predictive algorithm to identify, attempt to reach, assess, and care for patients at the highest risk for suicide. The authors aimed to evaluate whether facilitation enhanced implementation of REACH VET at VHA facilities not meeting target completion rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 program evaluation, a quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess changes in implementation outcome measures evaluated 6 months before and 6 months after onset of facilitation of REACH VET implementation at 23 VHA facilities. Measures included percentages of patients with documented coordinator and provider acknowledgment of receipt, care evaluation, and outreach attempt. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare differences in REACH VET outcome measures before and after facilitation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with personnel and were explored via template analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time had a significant effect in all outcomes models (p<0.001). An effect of facilitation was significant only for the outcome of attempted outreach. Patients identified by REACH VET had significantly higher odds of having a documented outreach attempt after facilitation of REACH VET implementation, compared with before facilitation. Site personnel felt supported and reported that the external facilitators were helpful and responsive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facilitation of REACH VET implementation was associated with an improvement in outreach attempts to veterans identified as being at increased risk for suicide. Outreach is critical for engaging veterans in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Implementation Facilitation on the REACH VET Clinical Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide.\",\"authors\":\"Sara J Landes, Bridget B Matarazzo, Jeffery A Pitcock, Karen L Drummond, Brandy N Smith, JoAnn E Kirchner, Kaily A Clark, Georgia R Gerard, Molly C Jankovsky, Lisa A Brenner, Mark A Reger, Aaron E Eagan, Rebecca Raciborski, Jacob Painter, James C Townsend, Susan M Jegley, Rajinder Sonia Singh, Jodie A Trafton, John F McCarthy, Ira R Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20230277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national suicide prevention program, called Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), that uses a predictive algorithm to identify, attempt to reach, assess, and care for patients at the highest risk for suicide. The authors aimed to evaluate whether facilitation enhanced implementation of REACH VET at VHA facilities not meeting target completion rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 program evaluation, a quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess changes in implementation outcome measures evaluated 6 months before and 6 months after onset of facilitation of REACH VET implementation at 23 VHA facilities. Measures included percentages of patients with documented coordinator and provider acknowledgment of receipt, care evaluation, and outreach attempt. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare differences in REACH VET outcome measures before and after facilitation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with personnel and were explored via template analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time had a significant effect in all outcomes models (p<0.001). An effect of facilitation was significant only for the outcome of attempted outreach. Patients identified by REACH VET had significantly higher odds of having a documented outreach attempt after facilitation of REACH VET implementation, compared with before facilitation. Site personnel felt supported and reported that the external facilitators were helpful and responsive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facilitation of REACH VET implementation was associated with an improvement in outreach attempts to veterans identified as being at increased risk for suicide. Outreach is critical for engaging veterans in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:2017年,退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)实施了一项名为 "健康恢复参与与协调--退伍军人强化治疗(REACH VET)"的全国性自杀预防计划,该计划使用一种预测算法来识别、尝试接触、评估和护理自杀风险最高的患者。作者的目的是评估在未达到目标完成率的退伍军人医疗服务机构中,促进是否能加强 REACH VET 的实施:在这项混合效果-实施类型 2 项目评估中,采用了准实验性的前后期设计,以评估在 23 家退伍军人医疗服务机构开始促进 REACH VET 实施前 6 个月和实施后 6 个月的实施结果指标的变化。评估指标包括有记录的协调员和医疗服务提供者确认接收、护理评估和外展尝试的患者百分比。使用广义估计方程来比较促进前后 REACH VET 结果测量的差异。对相关人员进行了定性访谈,并通过模板分析进行了探讨:结果:在所有结果模型中,时间都有明显影响(p结论:促进 REACH VET 的实施与改善对被确定为自杀风险较高的退伍军人的外展尝试有关。外展对于让退伍军人参与护理至关重要。
Impact of Implementation Facilitation on the REACH VET Clinical Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide.
Objective: In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national suicide prevention program, called Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), that uses a predictive algorithm to identify, attempt to reach, assess, and care for patients at the highest risk for suicide. The authors aimed to evaluate whether facilitation enhanced implementation of REACH VET at VHA facilities not meeting target completion rates.
Methods: In this hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 program evaluation, a quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess changes in implementation outcome measures evaluated 6 months before and 6 months after onset of facilitation of REACH VET implementation at 23 VHA facilities. Measures included percentages of patients with documented coordinator and provider acknowledgment of receipt, care evaluation, and outreach attempt. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare differences in REACH VET outcome measures before and after facilitation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with personnel and were explored via template analysis.
Results: Time had a significant effect in all outcomes models (p<0.001). An effect of facilitation was significant only for the outcome of attempted outreach. Patients identified by REACH VET had significantly higher odds of having a documented outreach attempt after facilitation of REACH VET implementation, compared with before facilitation. Site personnel felt supported and reported that the external facilitators were helpful and responsive.
Conclusions: Facilitation of REACH VET implementation was associated with an improvement in outreach attempts to veterans identified as being at increased risk for suicide. Outreach is critical for engaging veterans in care.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.