研究人员是否应该销毁录音或录像？

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500205

David B. Resnik, Alison Antes, Jessica Mozersky

{"title":"研究人员是否应该销毁录音或录像？","authors":"David B. Resnik, Alison Antes, Jessica Mozersky","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>It is a common practice in qualitative research to transcribe audio or video files from interviews or focus groups and then destroy the files at some future time, usually after validating the transcript or concluding the research. We argue that it is time to rethink this practice and that retention of original qualitative data—including audio and video recordings—should be the default stance in most cases.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"46 2","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Researchers Destroy Audio or Video Recordings?\",\"authors\":\"David B. Resnik, Alison Antes, Jessica Mozersky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eahr.500205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>It is a common practice in qualitative research to transcribe audio or video files from interviews or focus groups and then destroy the files at some future time, usually after validating the transcript or concluding the research. We argue that it is time to rethink this practice and that retention of original qualitative data—including audio and video recordings—should be the default stance in most cases.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics & human research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在定性研究中，通常的做法是从访谈或焦点小组中转录音频或视频文件，然后在未来的某个时间销毁这些文件，通常是在验证了转录内容或结束研究之后。我们认为，现在是重新思考这种做法的时候了，在大多数情况下，保留原始定性数据（包括音频和视频录像）应该是默认的立场。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Should Researchers Destroy Audio or Video Recordings?

It is a common practice in qualitative research to transcribe audio or video files from interviews or focus groups and then destroy the files at some future time, usually after validating the transcript or concluding the research. We argue that it is time to rethink this practice and that retention of original qualitative data—including audio and video recordings—should be the default stance in most cases.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊