以社区为基础的姑息关怀在养老院和家庭护理这两种初级护理环境中的应用:一项全国性调查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/14034948241232461
Mette Raunkiaer, Tina B Mikkelsen, Jahan Shabnam, Sofie R Christiansen, Lene Jarlbaek
{"title":"以社区为基础的姑息关怀在养老院和家庭护理这两种初级护理环境中的应用:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Mette Raunkiaer, Tina B Mikkelsen, Jahan Shabnam, Sofie R Christiansen, Lene Jarlbaek","doi":"10.1177/14034948241232461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Based on selected themes from a national survey, the study aims to describe and analyse similarities and differences in community-based palliative care provided to people living at home in two different care settings - the nursing home setting and the home care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Responses from four palliative care themes covered by a national survey sent to 717 managers in municipality-based care units were used. The themes were: (a) target groups in palliative care; (b) wishes for end-of-life care; (c) tools/guidelines in palliative care; and (d) palliative care provided to relatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rates were 53% in the nursing home setting and 69% in the home care setting (69%). Both settings had target groups for palliative care, in which significantly more units in the home care settings cared for people with other cultural backgrounds or children. Wishes for end-of-life care were addressed by more than 90% of the units in both settings. There were significantly more nursing home units that addressed questions regarding resuscitation, decision making when you are incapable of making decisions for yourself, and the level of medication. In both settings, around half of the units did not use or did not know if they used tools/guidelines to identify palliative care needs. Half of home care and 65% of nursing home settings did not/were unaware of providing palliative care to relatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Both settings serve target populations for palliative care with few differences. Identifying palliative care needs seemed to be a low priority in both settings. A difference was found between the settings regarding end-of-life care questions and palliative care promotion to relatives.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-based palliative care in two primary care settings - nursing homes and home care: a national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Raunkiaer, Tina B Mikkelsen, Jahan Shabnam, Sofie R Christiansen, Lene Jarlbaek\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948241232461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Based on selected themes from a national survey, the study aims to describe and analyse similarities and differences in community-based palliative care provided to people living at home in two different care settings - the nursing home setting and the home care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Responses from four palliative care themes covered by a national survey sent to 717 managers in municipality-based care units were used. The themes were: (a) target groups in palliative care; (b) wishes for end-of-life care; (c) tools/guidelines in palliative care; and (d) palliative care provided to relatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rates were 53% in the nursing home setting and 69% in the home care setting (69%). Both settings had target groups for palliative care, in which significantly more units in the home care settings cared for people with other cultural backgrounds or children. Wishes for end-of-life care were addressed by more than 90% of the units in both settings. There were significantly more nursing home units that addressed questions regarding resuscitation, decision making when you are incapable of making decisions for yourself, and the level of medication. In both settings, around half of the units did not use or did not know if they used tools/guidelines to identify palliative care needs. Half of home care and 65% of nursing home settings did not/were unaware of providing palliative care to relatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>Both settings serve target populations for palliative care with few differences. Identifying palliative care needs seemed to be a low priority in both settings. A difference was found between the settings regarding end-of-life care questions and palliative care promotion to relatives.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"90-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241232461\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241232461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究以一项全国性调查中选定的主题为基础,旨在描述和分析在两种不同的护理环境(养老院环境和家庭护理环境)中为居家者提供的基于社区的姑息关怀的异同:方法:研究采用了全国性调查中四个姑息关怀主题的答复,调查对象包括 717 名市级护理单位的管理人员。这些主题是(a) 姑息关怀的目标群体;(b) 临终关怀的愿望;(c) 姑息关怀的工具/指南;(d) 为亲属提供的姑息关怀:结果:疗养院的回复率为 53%,家庭护理的回复率为 69%。两种环境都有姑息关怀的目标群体,其中家庭护理环境中护理具有其他文化背景的人或儿童的单位明显较多。两种环境中都有 90% 以上的护理单元实现了临终关怀的愿望。有更多的养老院护理单元解决了有关复苏、当你无法为自己做决定时的决策以及用药量等问题。在这两种情况下,约有一半的护理单元没有使用或不知道他们是否使用工具/指南来识别姑息关怀的需求。半数的居家护理机构和65%的养老院没有/不知道向亲属提供姑息关怀: 结论:两种医疗机构为姑息关怀的目标人群提供服务的方式差别不大。识别姑息关怀需求似乎在这两种环境中都不是优先事项。在临终关怀问题和向亲属宣传姑息关怀方面,两种环境之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community-based palliative care in two primary care settings - nursing homes and home care: a national survey.

Aims: Based on selected themes from a national survey, the study aims to describe and analyse similarities and differences in community-based palliative care provided to people living at home in two different care settings - the nursing home setting and the home care setting.

Methods: Responses from four palliative care themes covered by a national survey sent to 717 managers in municipality-based care units were used. The themes were: (a) target groups in palliative care; (b) wishes for end-of-life care; (c) tools/guidelines in palliative care; and (d) palliative care provided to relatives.

Results: The response rates were 53% in the nursing home setting and 69% in the home care setting (69%). Both settings had target groups for palliative care, in which significantly more units in the home care settings cared for people with other cultural backgrounds or children. Wishes for end-of-life care were addressed by more than 90% of the units in both settings. There were significantly more nursing home units that addressed questions regarding resuscitation, decision making when you are incapable of making decisions for yourself, and the level of medication. In both settings, around half of the units did not use or did not know if they used tools/guidelines to identify palliative care needs. Half of home care and 65% of nursing home settings did not/were unaware of providing palliative care to relatives.

Conclusions: Both settings serve target populations for palliative care with few differences. Identifying palliative care needs seemed to be a low priority in both settings. A difference was found between the settings regarding end-of-life care questions and palliative care promotion to relatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
A taste of ambrosia: Do Olympic medalists live longer than Olympic losers? The diagnosis of cerebral palsy in two Danish national registries: a validation study. Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men. What is wellness? Investigating the importance of different domains of wellness among laypeople and experts: A survey study. Validation of the short version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1