了解主治医生在管理克罗恩氏肛周瘘患者中的作用。

IF 2.8 Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2023.2277146
Gregory D Salinas, Emily Belcher, Sylvie Stacy, Pradeep P Nazarey, Susan E Cazzetta
{"title":"了解主治医生在管理克罗恩氏肛周瘘患者中的作用。","authors":"Gregory D Salinas, Emily Belcher, Sylvie Stacy, Pradeep P Nazarey, Susan E Cazzetta","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2023.2277146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":"136 1","pages":"67-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the role of the primary care physician in the management of patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory D Salinas, Emily Belcher, Sylvie Stacy, Pradeep P Nazarey, Susan E Cazzetta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00325481.2023.2277146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"67-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2277146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2277146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解初级保健医生(PCPs)在识别、诊断和管理克罗恩氏肛周瘘管(CPF)方面的作用,以及他们的转诊模式和治疗期望:这项调查研究于 2020 年 9 月至 2020 年 10 月间进行。研究对象包括每周至少管理一名克罗恩病患者的美国初级保健医生。向参与者展示了两个与初级保健实践相关的病例小故事;病例小故事 1 由三部分组成,侧重于最初的 CPF 表现和进展到部分反应;病例小故事 2 侧重于复发性 CPF。调查问题旨在了解医生对每个病例的临床处理方法。数据以描述性统计的形式呈现:共有 151 名初级保健医生(从业年限中位数为 23 年)回答了调查问卷,他们每月接诊约 3 名新发/已发 CPF 患者。就病例 1 而言,一旦发现瘘道,89% 的受访者会将患者转诊,主要是转诊给结直肠外科医生或胃肠病医生。大多数初级保健医生(69%)会让患者开始接受药物治疗;46% 的初级保健医生会对患者进行诊断/影像学检查。转诊后的治疗预期各不相同:55% 的受访者认为外科医生会在手术前放置或使用固定器;23% 的受访者期望只进行药物治疗;23% 的受访者不确定。案例 2 显示,98% 的初级保健医生希望在转诊后参与患者护理;但只有 49% 的初级保健医生参与了患者护理。其中,76% 的初级保健医生认为他们的主要职责是加强患者的治疗依从性。虽然 80% 的初级保健医生对与多学科团队的沟通和护理协调至少感到中度满意,但 52% 的初级保健医生认为无法接触到专科医生至少是多学科团队管理的一个中度障碍:结论:初级保健医生希望更多地参与 CPF 患者的多学科管理。需要开展继续教育,为初级保健医生提供诊断方式、治疗方案、早期诊断、初级保健医生在多学科团队中的作用以及有效的 CPF 初始护理等方面的最新信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the role of the primary care physician in the management of patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas.

Objectives: To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations.

Methods: This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics.

Results: Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management.

Conclusion: PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary empyema treatment in the United States: predictors of surgical intervention following conservative management. Predicting the metabolically obese normal weight phenotype: sex-specific diagnostic accuracy of traditional and novel anthropometric indices. The role of shock index in acute coronary syndrome mortality prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: evidence, limitations, and patient selection in the contemporary era. Bayesian dosage adjustment of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1