使用草带对坡地径流-沉积物减少效益的影响变化

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.02.002
{"title":"使用草带对坡地径流-沉积物减少效益的影响变化","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dynamic of different grass strips width effects on runoff-sediment reduction benefit are not clearly understood. Thus, we aim to determine the optimum grass strips width on runoff-sediment reduction benefits on inceptisols slopes. In this work, using a soil flume as a carrier, we analyzed the influences of flow rate and grass strips width on runoff and sediment yield<span><span>, as well as determined the optimum grass strips width on runoff and sediment reduction benefit through simulated scouring experiments under different flow rates (4, 6 and 8 L/min) and grass strips widths (0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 m). The results showed that 1) the runoff coefficient increases binomial with increasing scouring time, and the runoff and sediment yield of grass strips were much lower than those of bare soil under a given flow rate. 2) Compared to the bare slope, the mean runoff and sediment reduction benefits of the average grass strips width were 27.20% and 43.66%, respectively. 3) The 1.00 m grass strips width had a great runoff-sediment benefit for controlling the </span>soil erosion, and the runoff-sediment reduction benefit was more sensitive to changes in grass strips width than to flow rate. Therefore, we can conclude that the 1.00 m grass strips width was the optimal grass strips width for reducing the runoff and sediment yield. These results have theoretical and practical significance for preventing water and soil loss on purple soil sloping farmland.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 624-632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in runoff-sediment reduction benefit of slope land as influenced by use of grass strips\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The dynamic of different grass strips width effects on runoff-sediment reduction benefit are not clearly understood. Thus, we aim to determine the optimum grass strips width on runoff-sediment reduction benefits on inceptisols slopes. In this work, using a soil flume as a carrier, we analyzed the influences of flow rate and grass strips width on runoff and sediment yield<span><span>, as well as determined the optimum grass strips width on runoff and sediment reduction benefit through simulated scouring experiments under different flow rates (4, 6 and 8 L/min) and grass strips widths (0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 m). The results showed that 1) the runoff coefficient increases binomial with increasing scouring time, and the runoff and sediment yield of grass strips were much lower than those of bare soil under a given flow rate. 2) Compared to the bare slope, the mean runoff and sediment reduction benefits of the average grass strips width were 27.20% and 43.66%, respectively. 3) The 1.00 m grass strips width had a great runoff-sediment benefit for controlling the </span>soil erosion, and the runoff-sediment reduction benefit was more sensitive to changes in grass strips width than to flow rate. Therefore, we can conclude that the 1.00 m grass strips width was the optimal grass strips width for reducing the runoff and sediment yield. These results have theoretical and practical significance for preventing water and soil loss on purple soil sloping farmland.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 624-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359324000211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359324000211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还不清楚不同草带宽度对径流-沉积物减少效益的动态影响。因此,我们的目标是确定最佳的草带宽度,使其对截流坡的径流-沉积物减少效益产生影响。在这项工作中,我们以土壤水槽为载体,通过不同流速(4、6 和 8 L/min)和草带宽度(0.50、0.75 和 1.00 m)下的模拟冲刷实验,分析了流速和草带宽度对径流和沉积物产量的影响,并确定了草带宽度对径流和沉积物减少效益的最佳影响。结果表明:1)随着冲刷时间的增加,径流系数呈二项式增加,在给定流速下,草带的径流量和泥沙产量远低于裸土。2) 与裸坡相比,平均草带宽度的径流和泥沙减少效益分别为 27.20% 和 43.66%。3) 1.00 米草带宽度对控制水土流失有很大的径流-沉积物效益,而且径流-沉积物减少效益对草带宽度的变化比对流速的变化更敏感。因此,我们可以得出结论,1.00 米的草带宽度是减少径流和泥沙产生量的最佳草带宽度。这些结果对于防止紫色土坡耕地的水土流失具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in runoff-sediment reduction benefit of slope land as influenced by use of grass strips

The dynamic of different grass strips width effects on runoff-sediment reduction benefit are not clearly understood. Thus, we aim to determine the optimum grass strips width on runoff-sediment reduction benefits on inceptisols slopes. In this work, using a soil flume as a carrier, we analyzed the influences of flow rate and grass strips width on runoff and sediment yield, as well as determined the optimum grass strips width on runoff and sediment reduction benefit through simulated scouring experiments under different flow rates (4, 6 and 8 L/min) and grass strips widths (0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 m). The results showed that 1) the runoff coefficient increases binomial with increasing scouring time, and the runoff and sediment yield of grass strips were much lower than those of bare soil under a given flow rate. 2) Compared to the bare slope, the mean runoff and sediment reduction benefits of the average grass strips width were 27.20% and 43.66%, respectively. 3) The 1.00 m grass strips width had a great runoff-sediment benefit for controlling the soil erosion, and the runoff-sediment reduction benefit was more sensitive to changes in grass strips width than to flow rate. Therefore, we can conclude that the 1.00 m grass strips width was the optimal grass strips width for reducing the runoff and sediment yield. These results have theoretical and practical significance for preventing water and soil loss on purple soil sloping farmland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The effects of land consolidation projects on pressurized irrigation system design and the cost: A case study from Türkiye A review on hydrobiogeochemical modelling in freshwater wetlands: Insights into model characteristics and applicability Strengthening oil pollution monitoring system in aquatic environment through development of IoT-based Oil-Water Separator Device The effect of climate change on stream basin hydrometeorological variables: The example of Dim Stream (Turkey)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1