This study quantifies the hydrodynamic response of structural (spurs) and vegetative (rigid submerged vegetation) interventions in a straight laboratory flume with alternating submerged and emergent sandbar configurations. Six experiments (EX1-EX6) were conducted to evaluate the influence of vegetation density and spur placement on streamwise velocity, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE*), Reynolds shear stress (RSS*), and quadrant-based turbulence structures across six cross-sections. Dense vegetation (lateral and longitudinal spacing = 2.5 cm) reduced near-bank streamwise velocity by up to 45%, with the maximum suppression observed at downstream cross-sections. Spur structures produced localized flow resistance and reduced velocity by up to 30%, but their influence diminished downstream of the spur region. TKE* peaked around 4-5 near spur tips, indicating localized turbulence amplification, while dense vegetation reduced TKE* to 1.5-2, aligning with canopy height and demonstrating its role in damping energy transfer. RSS* values reached approximately 6 near spurs, signifying enhanced downward momentum exchange, whereas dense vegetation reduced RSS* to about 2, confirming suppression of vertical turbulence. Quadrant analysis showed that spurs intensified outward (Q1) and sweep (Q4) bursts, whereas dense vegetation enhanced ejection (Q2) events, promoting upward momentum transfer and reducing near-bed shear stress. Overall, dense vegetation proved more effective than structural measures in stabilizing flow and reducing turbulence, offering a sustainable approach for riverbank protection and sediment control in channel systems.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
