Timothy A. Sayer , Nicky van Melick , Jerome Riera , Jeremy Jackson , Adam Bryant , Rob Bogie , Nicholas Cross , Pascal Edouard , Alexandre Rambaud
{"title":"是时候为前交叉韧带康复制定具体的恢复跑步标准了吗？物理治疗师对前交叉韧带损伤后恢复跑步标准的国际调查","authors":"Timothy A. Sayer , Nicky van Melick , Jerome Riera , Jeremy Jackson , Adam Bryant , Rob Bogie , Nicholas Cross , Pascal Edouard , Alexandre Rambaud","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine return to running criteria currently used by physiotherapists following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Self-reported online international survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online survey of physiotherapists across Australia, the Netherlands and France.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 476 respondants participated in the survey across Australia (n = 153), the Netherlands (n = 162), and France (n = 161). For return to running criteria following a non-operative approach, the majority of respondents chose swelling (40.55%, n = 193/476), pain (38.24%, n = 182/476), knee extensor strength (34.34%, n = 163/476), single leg squat (31.93%, n = 152/476) and knee flexor strength (29.83%, n = 142/476). After ACL reconstruction, the highest responses were also swelling (41.18%, n = 196/476), pain (37.18%, n = 177/476), knee extensor strength (37.18%, n = 177/476) and single leg squat (33.19%, n = 158/476). From the identified themes the most common cutoff variables were pain between 0 and 3/10, swelling < grade 1+ and limb symmetry on strength and hop tests >70 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physiotherapists in Australia, France, and the Netherlands use many different return to running criteria and most of them use more than one criterion. Despite this, there was little consensus on the cut-off physiotherapists use to apply these criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2400035X/pdfft?md5=341cf0f2a28901202b1beef28e310e1e&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X2400035X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it time to develop specific return to running criteria for ACL rehabilitation? An international survey of physiotherapists criteria for return to running following ACL injury\",\"authors\":\"Timothy A. Sayer , Nicky van Melick , Jerome Riera , Jeremy Jackson , Adam Bryant , Rob Bogie , Nicholas Cross , Pascal Edouard , Alexandre Rambaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine return to running criteria currently used by physiotherapists following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Self-reported online international survey.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online survey of physiotherapists across Australia, the Netherlands and France.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 476 respondants participated in the survey across Australia (n = 153), the Netherlands (n = 162), and France (n = 161). For return to running criteria following a non-operative approach, the majority of respondents chose swelling (40.55%, n = 193/476), pain (38.24%, n = 182/476), knee extensor strength (34.34%, n = 163/476), single leg squat (31.93%, n = 152/476) and knee flexor strength (29.83%, n = 142/476). After ACL reconstruction, the highest responses were also swelling (41.18%, n = 196/476), pain (37.18%, n = 177/476), knee extensor strength (37.18%, n = 177/476) and single leg squat (33.19%, n = 158/476). From the identified themes the most common cutoff variables were pain between 0 and 3/10, swelling < grade 1+ and limb symmetry on strength and hop tests >70 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physiotherapists in Australia, France, and the Netherlands use many different return to running criteria and most of them use more than one criterion. Despite this, there was little consensus on the cut-off physiotherapists use to apply these criteria.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2400035X/pdfft?md5=341cf0f2a28901202b1beef28e310e1e&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X2400035X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2400035X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X2400035X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is it time to develop specific return to running criteria for ACL rehabilitation? An international survey of physiotherapists criteria for return to running following ACL injury
Objective
To determine return to running criteria currently used by physiotherapists following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
Design
Self-reported online international survey.
Methods
An online survey of physiotherapists across Australia, the Netherlands and France.
Results
A total of 476 respondants participated in the survey across Australia (n = 153), the Netherlands (n = 162), and France (n = 161). For return to running criteria following a non-operative approach, the majority of respondents chose swelling (40.55%, n = 193/476), pain (38.24%, n = 182/476), knee extensor strength (34.34%, n = 163/476), single leg squat (31.93%, n = 152/476) and knee flexor strength (29.83%, n = 142/476). After ACL reconstruction, the highest responses were also swelling (41.18%, n = 196/476), pain (37.18%, n = 177/476), knee extensor strength (37.18%, n = 177/476) and single leg squat (33.19%, n = 158/476). From the identified themes the most common cutoff variables were pain between 0 and 3/10, swelling < grade 1+ and limb symmetry on strength and hop tests >70 %.
Conclusion
Physiotherapists in Australia, France, and the Netherlands use many different return to running criteria and most of them use more than one criterion. Despite this, there was little consensus on the cut-off physiotherapists use to apply these criteria.
期刊介绍：
Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science.
The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
