芬戈莫德和干扰素在控制多发性硬化症患者残疾和复发率方面的疗效:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_12_22
Vahid Shaygannejad, Omid Mirmosayyeb, Sara Bagherieh, Parisa Shaygan, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
{"title":"芬戈莫德和干扰素在控制多发性硬化症患者残疾和复发率方面的疗效:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Vahid Shaygannejad, Omid Mirmosayyeb, Sara Bagherieh, Parisa Shaygan, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh","doi":"10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_12_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fingolimod and interferons are used in the relapse form of multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of fingolimod versus interferon in patients with MS. The systematic search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The references of included studies as well as conference abstracts were searched up to July 2021. The literature search revealed 8211 articles, and after deleting duplicates 5594 remained. For the meta-analysis, four studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) after treatment (interferon vs fingolimod) was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.17) (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SMD of the annual relapse rate (ARR) after treatment (interferon - fingolimod) was -0.08 (95% CI: -0.53, 0.36) (I<sup>2</sup> = 95.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The SMD of the ARR after treatment and before treatment in the interferon group was - 1.45, (95% CI: -1.55, -1.36) (I<sup>2</sup> = 0, <i>P</i> = 0.3). The SMD of ARR after treatment and before treatment in the fingolimod group was - 1.3, (95% CI: -1.94, -0.65) (I<sup>2</sup> = 97.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review show that efficacy of interferon and fingolimod in controlling relapse rate and disability is similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":14342,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Fingolimod and Interferons in Controlling Disability and Relapse Rate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Shaygannejad, Omid Mirmosayyeb, Sara Bagherieh, Parisa Shaygan, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_12_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fingolimod and interferons are used in the relapse form of multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of fingolimod versus interferon in patients with MS. The systematic search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The references of included studies as well as conference abstracts were searched up to July 2021. The literature search revealed 8211 articles, and after deleting duplicates 5594 remained. For the meta-analysis, four studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) after treatment (interferon vs fingolimod) was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.17) (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SMD of the annual relapse rate (ARR) after treatment (interferon - fingolimod) was -0.08 (95% CI: -0.53, 0.36) (I<sup>2</sup> = 95.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The SMD of the ARR after treatment and before treatment in the interferon group was - 1.45, (95% CI: -1.55, -1.36) (I<sup>2</sup> = 0, <i>P</i> = 0.3). The SMD of ARR after treatment and before treatment in the fingolimod group was - 1.3, (95% CI: -1.94, -0.65) (I<sup>2</sup> = 97.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review show that efficacy of interferon and fingolimod in controlling relapse rate and disability is similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_12_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_12_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:芬戈莫德和干扰素被用于多发性硬化症(MS)的复发治疗。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估芬戈莫德与干扰素对多发性硬化症患者的疗效。方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science和Google Scholar上进行系统检索:方法:检索了截至 2021 年 7 月纳入研究的参考文献和会议摘要。文献检索共发现 8211 篇文章,删除重复文章后剩余 5594 篇。在荟萃分析中,共纳入了四项研究。结果显示,治疗(干扰素 vs 芬戈莫德)后扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)的标准化平均差(SMD)为-0.06(95% CI:-0.28,0.17)(I2 = 80.2%,P = 0.002):治疗(干扰素-芬戈莫德)后年复发率(ARR)的SMD为-0.08(95% CI:-0.53,0.36)(I2 = 95.5%,P < 0.001)。干扰素组治疗后与治疗前的ARR的SMD为-1.45,(95% CI:-1.55,-1.36)(I2 = 0,P = 0.3)。芬戈莫德组治疗后和治疗前的ARR的SMD为-1.3,(95% CI:-1.94,-0.65)(I2 = 97.4%,P < 0.001)。结论本次系统综述的结果表明,干扰素和芬戈莫德在控制复发率和残疾方面的疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Efficacy of Fingolimod and Interferons in Controlling Disability and Relapse Rate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Fingolimod and interferons are used in the relapse form of multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of fingolimod versus interferon in patients with MS. The systematic search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.

Methods: The references of included studies as well as conference abstracts were searched up to July 2021. The literature search revealed 8211 articles, and after deleting duplicates 5594 remained. For the meta-analysis, four studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) after treatment (interferon vs fingolimod) was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.17) (I2 = 80.2%, P = 0.002).

Results: The SMD of the annual relapse rate (ARR) after treatment (interferon - fingolimod) was -0.08 (95% CI: -0.53, 0.36) (I2 = 95.5%, P < 0.001). The SMD of the ARR after treatment and before treatment in the interferon group was - 1.45, (95% CI: -1.55, -1.36) (I2 = 0, P = 0.3). The SMD of ARR after treatment and before treatment in the fingolimod group was - 1.3, (95% CI: -1.94, -0.65) (I2 = 97.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review show that efficacy of interferon and fingolimod in controlling relapse rate and disability is similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Preventive Medicine
International Journal of Preventive Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: International Journal of Preventive Medicine, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Continuous print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.ijpvmjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Preventive Medicine. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
History of Mental Health in the Philippines: A Response to the Call to Revolutionize Mental Health Services Toward Positive Well-being. Information-seeking Behavior of Iranian Young Adults (18-28 Years Old) Regarding HPV on Social Media: A Preventive Approach to HPV. Prognostic Factors of Hip Fracture in Elderly: A Systematic Review. Positive Mental Health Promotion to Address Suicide Rates: Hope Intervention on Suicide. The Role of Internet Addiction Recovery Camps in Addressing Digital Dependency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1