社区长期导管管理:基于人口的英格兰用户特征、服务利用率和成本分析。

Heather Gage, Peter Williams, Miriam Avery, Catherine Murphy, Mandy Fader
{"title":"社区长期导管管理:基于人口的英格兰用户特征、服务利用率和成本分析。","authors":"Heather Gage, Peter Williams, Miriam Avery, Catherine Murphy, Mandy Fader","doi":"10.1017/S1463423624000021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term urinary catheters are problematic and burdensome for patients, carers and health services. Nursing practice to improve the management of long-term urinary catheters has been held back by a lack of evidence to support policy and practice. Little is known about who uses a catheter long term and the resources and costs needed for their management. Understanding these costs will help to target innovations to improve care. There have been no substantial innovations to urinary catheters or their management recently and no publications to characterise users and costs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe long-term catheter users and explore catheter-related service use and costs in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive information on the characteristics of catheter users and their use of services was obtained from: General Practice records (<i>n</i> = 607), district nursing records (<i>n</i> = 303), questionnaires to patients (<i>n</i> = 333) and triangulated, 2009-2012. Annual service costs (British pounds 2011) were computed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most catheter users (59.6%) were men, nearly three-quarters (71.2%) were over 70 years and 60.8% used a urethral catheter. Women tended to be younger than men and more likely to use a suprapubic catheter. The services used most frequently over 12 months were general practitioner (by 63.1%) and out of hours services (43.0%); 15.5% accessed Accident and Emergency services for urgent catheter-related care. Hospital use accounted for nearly half (48.9%) of total health service costs (mainly due to inpatient stays by 13.6% of participants); catheter supplies/medications were next most costly (25.7%). Half of all costs were accounted for by 14.2% of users. The median annual cost of services used was £6.38, IQR: £344-£1324; district nursing services added approximately a further £200 per annum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finding better ways to reduce catheter problems (e.g. blockage, infection) that cause unplanned visits, urgent or hospital care should be a priority to improve quality of life for long-term catheter users and reduce health service expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term catheter management in the community: a population-based analysis of user characteristics, service utilisation and costs in England.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Gage, Peter Williams, Miriam Avery, Catherine Murphy, Mandy Fader\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423624000021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term urinary catheters are problematic and burdensome for patients, carers and health services. Nursing practice to improve the management of long-term urinary catheters has been held back by a lack of evidence to support policy and practice. Little is known about who uses a catheter long term and the resources and costs needed for their management. Understanding these costs will help to target innovations to improve care. There have been no substantial innovations to urinary catheters or their management recently and no publications to characterise users and costs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe long-term catheter users and explore catheter-related service use and costs in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive information on the characteristics of catheter users and their use of services was obtained from: General Practice records (<i>n</i> = 607), district nursing records (<i>n</i> = 303), questionnaires to patients (<i>n</i> = 333) and triangulated, 2009-2012. Annual service costs (British pounds 2011) were computed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most catheter users (59.6%) were men, nearly three-quarters (71.2%) were over 70 years and 60.8% used a urethral catheter. Women tended to be younger than men and more likely to use a suprapubic catheter. The services used most frequently over 12 months were general practitioner (by 63.1%) and out of hours services (43.0%); 15.5% accessed Accident and Emergency services for urgent catheter-related care. Hospital use accounted for nearly half (48.9%) of total health service costs (mainly due to inpatient stays by 13.6% of participants); catheter supplies/medications were next most costly (25.7%). Half of all costs were accounted for by 14.2% of users. The median annual cost of services used was £6.38, IQR: £344-£1324; district nursing services added approximately a further £200 per annum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finding better ways to reduce catheter problems (e.g. blockage, infection) that cause unplanned visits, urgent or hospital care should be a priority to improve quality of life for long-term catheter users and reduce health service expenditure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"e13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期导尿对患者、护理人员和医疗服务机构来说都是问题和负担。由于缺乏支持政策和实践的证据,改善长期导尿管管理的护理实践一直受到阻碍。人们对哪些人长期使用导尿管以及管理导尿管所需的资源和成本知之甚少。了解这些成本将有助于有针对性地进行创新,以改善护理。最近在导尿管或其管理方面没有实质性的创新,也没有出版物对使用者和成本进行描述。目的:描述导尿管的长期使用者,探讨英格兰导尿管相关服务的使用情况和成本:有关导尿管使用者特征及其服务使用情况的描述性信息来自:2009-2012 年全科医生记录(n = 607)、地区护理记录(n = 303)、患者问卷调查(n = 333)和三角测量。计算了每年的服务成本(2011 年英镑):大多数导尿管使用者(59.6%)为男性,近四分之三(71.2%)的人年龄超过 70 岁,60.8% 的人使用尿道导尿管。女性往往比男性年轻,更有可能使用耻骨上导尿管。在 12 个月中,最常使用的服务是全科医生(63.1%)和非工作时间服务(43.0%);15.5% 的人因导尿管相关的紧急护理而使用急诊服务。住院费用占医疗服务总费用的近一半(48.9%)(主要是由于 13.6% 的参与者住院所致);其次是导管耗材/药物费用(25.7%)。14.2% 的使用者承担了所有费用的一半。所使用服务的年成本中位数为 6.38 英镑,IQR:344-1324 英镑;地区护理服务每年增加约 200 英镑:寻找更好的方法来减少导管问题(如堵塞、感染)导致的计划外就诊、紧急护理或医院护理,应成为改善长期导管使用者生活质量和减少医疗服务支出的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term catheter management in the community: a population-based analysis of user characteristics, service utilisation and costs in England.

Background: Long-term urinary catheters are problematic and burdensome for patients, carers and health services. Nursing practice to improve the management of long-term urinary catheters has been held back by a lack of evidence to support policy and practice. Little is known about who uses a catheter long term and the resources and costs needed for their management. Understanding these costs will help to target innovations to improve care. There have been no substantial innovations to urinary catheters or their management recently and no publications to characterise users and costs.

Aim: To describe long-term catheter users and explore catheter-related service use and costs in England.

Methods: Descriptive information on the characteristics of catheter users and their use of services was obtained from: General Practice records (n = 607), district nursing records (n = 303), questionnaires to patients (n = 333) and triangulated, 2009-2012. Annual service costs (British pounds 2011) were computed.

Findings: Most catheter users (59.6%) were men, nearly three-quarters (71.2%) were over 70 years and 60.8% used a urethral catheter. Women tended to be younger than men and more likely to use a suprapubic catheter. The services used most frequently over 12 months were general practitioner (by 63.1%) and out of hours services (43.0%); 15.5% accessed Accident and Emergency services for urgent catheter-related care. Hospital use accounted for nearly half (48.9%) of total health service costs (mainly due to inpatient stays by 13.6% of participants); catheter supplies/medications were next most costly (25.7%). Half of all costs were accounted for by 14.2% of users. The median annual cost of services used was £6.38, IQR: £344-£1324; district nursing services added approximately a further £200 per annum.

Conclusions: Finding better ways to reduce catheter problems (e.g. blockage, infection) that cause unplanned visits, urgent or hospital care should be a priority to improve quality of life for long-term catheter users and reduce health service expenditure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy ageing in long-term care? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: a position paper. Early structured communication between general practitioner, sick-listed patient, and employer: Results and lessons learned from a pragmatic trial in the Capacity Note project. The impact of COVID-19 on referrals among general practitioners and specialists in Shanghai, China. The unrevealed links: periodontal health, human milk composition, and infant gut microbiome dynamics. Primary healthcare as a strategy for eliminating hepatitis C: the METRIC toolkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1