远近空间的代入感

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103672
Marika Mariano , Giulia Stanco , Damiano Ignazio Graps , Ileana Rossetti , Nadia Bolognini , Eraldo Paulesu , Laura Zapparoli
{"title":"远近空间的代入感","authors":"Marika Mariano ,&nbsp;Giulia Stanco ,&nbsp;Damiano Ignazio Graps ,&nbsp;Ileana Rossetti ,&nbsp;Nadia Bolognini ,&nbsp;Eraldo Paulesu ,&nbsp;Laura Zapparoli","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sense of agency is the ability to recognize that we are the actors of our actions and their consequences.</p><p>We explored whether and how spatial cues may modulate the agency experience by manipulating the ecological validity of the experimental setup (real-space or computer-based setup) and the distance of the action-outcome (near or far).</p><p>We tested 58 healthy adults collecting explicit agency judgments and the perceived time interval between movements and outcomes (to quantify the intentional binding phenomenon, an implicit index of agency).</p><p>Participants show greater implicit agency for voluntary actions when there is a temporal and spatial action-outcome contingency. Conversely, participants reported similar explicit agency for outcomes appearing in the near and far space. Notably, these effects were independent of the ecological validity of the setting.</p><p>These results suggest that spatial proximity, realistic or illusory, is essential for feeling implicitly responsible for the consequences of our actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000394/pdfft?md5=a883a68580c70408cd8ce8dca4d09f89&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024000394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sense of agency in near and far space\",\"authors\":\"Marika Mariano ,&nbsp;Giulia Stanco ,&nbsp;Damiano Ignazio Graps ,&nbsp;Ileana Rossetti ,&nbsp;Nadia Bolognini ,&nbsp;Eraldo Paulesu ,&nbsp;Laura Zapparoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sense of agency is the ability to recognize that we are the actors of our actions and their consequences.</p><p>We explored whether and how spatial cues may modulate the agency experience by manipulating the ecological validity of the experimental setup (real-space or computer-based setup) and the distance of the action-outcome (near or far).</p><p>We tested 58 healthy adults collecting explicit agency judgments and the perceived time interval between movements and outcomes (to quantify the intentional binding phenomenon, an implicit index of agency).</p><p>Participants show greater implicit agency for voluntary actions when there is a temporal and spatial action-outcome contingency. Conversely, participants reported similar explicit agency for outcomes appearing in the near and far space. Notably, these effects were independent of the ecological validity of the setting.</p><p>These results suggest that spatial proximity, realistic or illusory, is essential for feeling implicitly responsible for the consequences of our actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000394/pdfft?md5=a883a68580c70408cd8ce8dca4d09f89&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024000394-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过操纵实验设置(真实空间或基于计算机的设置)的生态有效性和动作-结果的距离(近或远),探讨了空间线索是否以及如何调节代理体验。我们对 58 名健康成年人进行了测试,收集了他们的显性代理判断以及动作与结果之间的感知时间间隔(量化意向束缚现象,这是代理的隐性指标)。相反,参与者对出现在近空间和远空间的结果表现出相似的显性代理。值得注意的是,这些效应与环境的生态有效性无关。这些结果表明,空间接近性,无论是现实的还是虚幻的,对于感觉到自己对行为后果负有隐性责任都是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The sense of agency in near and far space

The sense of agency is the ability to recognize that we are the actors of our actions and their consequences.

We explored whether and how spatial cues may modulate the agency experience by manipulating the ecological validity of the experimental setup (real-space or computer-based setup) and the distance of the action-outcome (near or far).

We tested 58 healthy adults collecting explicit agency judgments and the perceived time interval between movements and outcomes (to quantify the intentional binding phenomenon, an implicit index of agency).

Participants show greater implicit agency for voluntary actions when there is a temporal and spatial action-outcome contingency. Conversely, participants reported similar explicit agency for outcomes appearing in the near and far space. Notably, these effects were independent of the ecological validity of the setting.

These results suggest that spatial proximity, realistic or illusory, is essential for feeling implicitly responsible for the consequences of our actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
Priors for natural image statistics inform confidence in perceptual decisions. Immersive exposure to simulated visual hallucinations modulates high-level human cognition. Opening the black box: Think Aloud as a method to study the spontaneous stream of consciousness. Optimising episodic encoding within segmented virtual contexts. How can virtual reality help to understand consciousness? A thematic analysis of students' experiences in a novel virtual environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1