重新定位东方:通过肤色主义理论扩展反亚洲种族主义学术研究

IF 2.2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1111/soin.12600
Rachel Engel
{"title":"重新定位东方:通过肤色主义理论扩展反亚洲种族主义学术研究","authors":"Rachel Engel","doi":"10.1111/soin.12600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article challenges scholars to broaden their definition of anti‐Asian racism and whiteness through the lens of colorism theory. Existing literature on Asian Americans finds that the racial category is unique in its high percentage of foreign‐born individuals, yet little attention has been paid to how systems of discrimination and social stratification relevant in the Asian regional context have translated to or are relevant in the U.S. context. Through a systematic review of Asian American racialization literature, this article interrogates how the literature has continued to operate within a Black‐White binary and why the challenge to break out of said binary remains a timely one. Ultimately, this article encourages scholars to consider Global South perspectives on colorism and racism, thereby challenging scholars to orient away from Whiteness as it is understood in the limited U.S. racial context, and instead contend with the status of whiteness as it is understood in the Asian regional context. Such a theoretical reorientation promises to advance scholarly knowledge of intricate Asian American intra‐group dynamics and contribute to the growing literature on transnational anti‐Asian racism.","PeriodicalId":47699,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reorienting the Orient: Expanding upon Anti‐Asian Racism Scholarship through the Lens of Colorism Theory\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soin.12600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article challenges scholars to broaden their definition of anti‐Asian racism and whiteness through the lens of colorism theory. Existing literature on Asian Americans finds that the racial category is unique in its high percentage of foreign‐born individuals, yet little attention has been paid to how systems of discrimination and social stratification relevant in the Asian regional context have translated to or are relevant in the U.S. context. Through a systematic review of Asian American racialization literature, this article interrogates how the literature has continued to operate within a Black‐White binary and why the challenge to break out of said binary remains a timely one. Ultimately, this article encourages scholars to consider Global South perspectives on colorism and racism, thereby challenging scholars to orient away from Whiteness as it is understood in the limited U.S. racial context, and instead contend with the status of whiteness as it is understood in the Asian regional context. Such a theoretical reorientation promises to advance scholarly knowledge of intricate Asian American intra‐group dynamics and contribute to the growing literature on transnational anti‐Asian racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Inquiry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文挑战学者们通过肤色主义理论的视角拓宽反亚裔种族主义和白人的定义。有关亚裔美国人的现有文献发现,亚裔美国人这一种族类别的独特之处在于其外国出生者所占的比例较高,然而,人们却很少关注与亚洲地区相关的歧视和社会分层制度是如何转化到美国或与美国相关的。本文通过对亚裔美国人种族化文献的系统回顾,探讨了这些文献是如何继续在黑白二元论的框架内运作的,以及为什么打破二元论仍然是一个适时的挑战。最终,本文鼓励学者们从全球南方的视角来考虑肤色主义和种族主义,从而挑战学者们的研究方向,使他们不再局限于美国种族背景下所理解的白人,而是要研究亚洲地区背景下所理解的白人的地位。这种理论上的重新定位有望促进学者们对错综复杂的亚裔美国人群体内部动态的了解,并为不断增长的有关跨国反亚裔种族主义的文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reorienting the Orient: Expanding upon Anti‐Asian Racism Scholarship through the Lens of Colorism Theory
This article challenges scholars to broaden their definition of anti‐Asian racism and whiteness through the lens of colorism theory. Existing literature on Asian Americans finds that the racial category is unique in its high percentage of foreign‐born individuals, yet little attention has been paid to how systems of discrimination and social stratification relevant in the Asian regional context have translated to or are relevant in the U.S. context. Through a systematic review of Asian American racialization literature, this article interrogates how the literature has continued to operate within a Black‐White binary and why the challenge to break out of said binary remains a timely one. Ultimately, this article encourages scholars to consider Global South perspectives on colorism and racism, thereby challenging scholars to orient away from Whiteness as it is understood in the limited U.S. racial context, and instead contend with the status of whiteness as it is understood in the Asian regional context. Such a theoretical reorientation promises to advance scholarly knowledge of intricate Asian American intra‐group dynamics and contribute to the growing literature on transnational anti‐Asian racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Sociological Inquiry (SI) is committed to the exploration of the human condition in all of its social and cultural complexity. Its papers challenge us to look anew at traditional areas or identify novel areas for investigation. SI publishes both theoretical and empirical work as well as varied research methods in the study of social and cultural life.
期刊最新文献
Anticipatory Race‐Related Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among U.S. Black Women Attending a Historically Black University: Are Psychosocial Resources Stress Buffers? Working Time, Income Inequality, and Life Expectancy: A Longitudinal Analysis of US States, 2005–2018 “We May Look Like Cream‐of‐the‐Crop Kids, but it's Tough Here”: Elite Identity, Emotional Burden, and Ethical Transgressions Among Students at an Elite High School “Don't Touch!”: The Role of Cultural Knowledge in Low‐SES Parents' Perceptions of Museums Does Social Trust Travel? Comparing Resident and Non‐resident Citizens from a High‐Trusting Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1