入院前体育锻炼对老年心肌梗死患者在生理学指导下进行完全血运重建的益处的影响:FIRE 试验的启示。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae069
Rita Pavasini, Gianluca Campo, Matteo Serenelli, Elisabetta Tonet, Vincenzo Guiducci, Javier Escaned, Raul Moreno, Gianni Casella, Caterina Cavazza, Ferdinando Varbella, Giorgio Sacchetta, Marco Arena, Ignacio Amat Santos, Enrique Gutiérrez Ibañes, Roberto Scarsini, Gianpiero D'Amico, Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda, José Luis Díez Gil, Gianluca Pignatelli, Gianmarco Iannopollo, Iginio Colaiori, Ramon Calvino Santos, Andrea Marrone, Luca Fileti, Stefano Rigattieri, Emanuele Barbato, Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez, Simone Biscaglia
{"title":"入院前体育锻炼对老年心肌梗死患者在生理学指导下进行完全血运重建的益处的影响:FIRE 试验的启示。","authors":"Rita Pavasini, Gianluca Campo, Matteo Serenelli, Elisabetta Tonet, Vincenzo Guiducci, Javier Escaned, Raul Moreno, Gianni Casella, Caterina Cavazza, Ferdinando Varbella, Giorgio Sacchetta, Marco Arena, Ignacio Amat Santos, Enrique Gutiérrez Ibañes, Roberto Scarsini, Gianpiero D'Amico, Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda, José Luis Díez Gil, Gianluca Pignatelli, Gianmarco Iannopollo, Iginio Colaiori, Ramon Calvino Santos, Andrea Marrone, Luca Fileti, Stefano Rigattieri, Emanuele Barbato, Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez, Simone Biscaglia","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pre-admission physical activity on benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction: insights from the FIRE trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rita Pavasini, Gianluca Campo, Matteo Serenelli, Elisabetta Tonet, Vincenzo Guiducci, Javier Escaned, Raul Moreno, Gianni Casella, Caterina Cavazza, Ferdinando Varbella, Giorgio Sacchetta, Marco Arena, Ignacio Amat Santos, Enrique Gutiérrez Ibañes, Roberto Scarsini, Gianpiero D'Amico, Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda, José Luis Díez Gil, Gianluca Pignatelli, Gianmarco Iannopollo, Iginio Colaiori, Ramon Calvino Santos, Andrea Marrone, Luca Fileti, Stefano Rigattieri, Emanuele Barbato, Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez, Simone Biscaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究分析了老年心肌梗死伴多血管疾病患者的功能评估(FIRE)试验,旨在探讨入院前体力活动的重要性,并评估生理学指导下完全血管再通的益处是否同样适用于久坐和活跃的老年患者:年龄在75岁或以上的心肌梗死(MI)和多支血管疾病患者被随机分配接受生理学指导下的完全血管再通或单纯罪魁祸首策略。主要结果是死亡、心肌梗死、中风或一年内任何血管再通的复合结果。次要终点包括心血管死亡或心肌梗死的综合结果,以及主要终点的单项结果。入院前的体力活动分为三组:(i) 缺乏(久坐不动)、(ii) 轻度、(iii) 剧烈。在 1445 名患者中,692 人(48%)久坐不动,560 人(39%)和 193 人(13%)分别进行了轻度和剧烈运动。与久坐不动的人相比,入院前进行轻度或剧烈运动的患者发生主要结局的风险较低[轻度危险比(HR)分别为0.70,95%置信区间(CI)为0.55-0.91;剧烈危险比(HR)分别为0.14,95%置信区间(CI)为0.07-0.91]。在死亡、心血管死亡或心肌梗死方面也观察到这些趋势。在比较生理学指导下的完全血管再通与单纯罪魁祸首策略时,根据久坐或活动状态进行分层,在主要终点和次要终点方面没有观察到显著的交互作用:在老年心肌梗死患者中,入院前的体力活动是一个强有力的独立预后决定因素。无论入院前的体力活动状况如何,生理指导下的完全血管再通都是减少缺血性不良事件的有效策略:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of pre-admission physical activity on benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction: insights from the FIRE trial.

Aims: The present analysis from the Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease (FIRE) trial aims to explore the significance of pre-admission physical activity and assess whether the benefits of physiology-guided complete revascularization apply consistently to sedentary and active older patients.

Methods and results: Patients aged 75 years or more with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease were randomized to receive physiology-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or any revascularization within a year. Secondary endpoints included the composite of cardiovascular death or MI, as well as single components of the primary endpoint. Pre-admission physical activity was categorized into three groups: (i) absent (sedentary), (ii) light, and (iii) vigorous. Among 1445 patients, 692 (48%) were sedentary, whereas 560 (39%) and 193 (13%) performed light and vigorous physical activity, respectively. Patients engaging in light or vigorous pre-admission physical activity exhibited a reduced risk of the primary outcome compared with sedentary individuals [light hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.91 and vigorous HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.91, respectively]. These trends were also observed for death, cardiovascular death, or MI. When comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization vs. culprit-only strategy, no significant interaction was observed for primary and secondary endpoints when stratified by sedentary or active status.

Conclusion: In older patients with MI, pre-admission physical activity emerges as a robust and independent prognostic determinant. Physiology-guided complete revascularization stands out an effective strategy in reducing ischaemic adverse events, irrespective of pre-admission physical activity status.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772743.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. EJPC @ a glance: focus issue on cardiovascular risk prediction in primary and secondary prevention. Effect of Behavior-change Interventions on Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: The OPTIMA Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cardiovascular risk estimation: can a risk prediction model derived in one country be used in another? Electrocardiographic and morphological cardiac remodeling in competitive female athletes - a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1