接受快速上颌扩张和面罩治疗两种方案的患者的颞下颌关节盘位置和形状:随机临床试验。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12777
Daniella Torres Tagawa, Angela Maria Borri Wolosker, Bruna Maluza Florez, Gladys Cristina Dominguez, Helio Kiitiro Yamashita, Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar, Henrique Carrete Junior
{"title":"接受快速上颌扩张和面罩治疗两种方案的患者的颞下颌关节盘位置和形状:随机临床试验。","authors":"Daniella Torres Tagawa,&nbsp;Angela Maria Borri Wolosker,&nbsp;Bruna Maluza Florez,&nbsp;Gladys Cristina Dominguez,&nbsp;Helio Kiitiro Yamashita,&nbsp;Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar,&nbsp;Henrique Carrete Junior","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this prospective study was to assess possible changes in the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc in patients treated with two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask (FM) therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of 88 patients with Class III or Class III subdivision malocclusions, aged between 6 and 13 years, were consecutively selected and divided into three groups (G): G1-34 patients were treated with RME, followed by FM therapy; G2-34 patients were treated using RME according to modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (ALT-RAMEC) protocol, followed by FM therapy. These treated groups were randomly (1:1 allocation ratio) distributed according to the two treatment protocols. G3 – Control Group – 20 untreated patients were followed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) TMJs were obtained before (T1) and after (T2) a treatment period or follow-up. McNemar test, Fisher's exact test and intra- and inter-observer concordance (K) were performed (<i>p</i> ≤ .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline cephalometric variables at T1 between the groups. There were statistically significant differences between the groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) in relation to the disc shape in T1, since G1 (8 TMJs −11.76%) presented higher occurrences of altered forms in comparison with G2 (no changes). No significant differences were observed in disc position CM and OM (G1 – <i>p</i> &gt; .999; G2 – <i>p</i> = .063; G3 – <i>p</i> = .500) and shape (G1 – <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999; G2 – <i>p</i> = .250; G3 – not calculable), between T1 × T2, in any of the groups studied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The two treatment protocols did not have adverse effects on the position and shape of the TMJ disc, in a short-term evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporomandibular joint disc position and shape in patients submitted to two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy: A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Daniella Torres Tagawa,&nbsp;Angela Maria Borri Wolosker,&nbsp;Bruna Maluza Florez,&nbsp;Gladys Cristina Dominguez,&nbsp;Helio Kiitiro Yamashita,&nbsp;Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar,&nbsp;Henrique Carrete Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this prospective study was to assess possible changes in the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc in patients treated with two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask (FM) therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of 88 patients with Class III or Class III subdivision malocclusions, aged between 6 and 13 years, were consecutively selected and divided into three groups (G): G1-34 patients were treated with RME, followed by FM therapy; G2-34 patients were treated using RME according to modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (ALT-RAMEC) protocol, followed by FM therapy. These treated groups were randomly (1:1 allocation ratio) distributed according to the two treatment protocols. G3 – Control Group – 20 untreated patients were followed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) TMJs were obtained before (T1) and after (T2) a treatment period or follow-up. McNemar test, Fisher's exact test and intra- and inter-observer concordance (K) were performed (<i>p</i> ≤ .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline cephalometric variables at T1 between the groups. There were statistically significant differences between the groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) in relation to the disc shape in T1, since G1 (8 TMJs −11.76%) presented higher occurrences of altered forms in comparison with G2 (no changes). No significant differences were observed in disc position CM and OM (G1 – <i>p</i> &gt; .999; G2 – <i>p</i> = .063; G3 – <i>p</i> = .500) and shape (G1 – <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999; G2 – <i>p</i> = .250; G3 – not calculable), between T1 × T2, in any of the groups studied.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The two treatment protocols did not have adverse effects on the position and shape of the TMJ disc, in a short-term evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估接受快速上颌扩弓(RME)和面罩(FM)两种治疗方案的患者颞下颌关节(TMJ)关节盘的位置和形状可能发生的变化:连续选取88名年龄在6至13岁之间的Ⅲ类或Ⅲ类下颌畸形患者,将其分为三组(G组):G1-34组患者接受RME治疗,然后接受调频治疗;G2-34组患者根据改良的上颌快速扩张和收缩交替方案(ALT-RAMEC)接受RME治疗,然后接受调频治疗。这些治疗组按照两种治疗方案随机分配(分配比例为 1:1)。G3 - 对照组 - 20 名未经治疗的患者。在治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)或随访期间采集颞下颌关节磁共振成像(MRI)。进行了 McNemar 检验、费雪精确检验以及观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性检验(K)(P ≤ .05):结果:两组在 T1 期的头颅测量基线变量无明显统计学差异。在研究的任何一组中,T1 × T2 之间的组间差异(p .999;G2 - p = .063;G3 - p = .500)和形状差异(G1 - p > 0.999;G2 - p = .250;G3 - 无法计算)均有统计学意义:结论:在短期评估中,两种治疗方案对颞下颌关节盘的位置和形状没有不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporomandibular joint disc position and shape in patients submitted to two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy: A randomized clinical trial

Objective

The objective of this prospective study was to assess possible changes in the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc in patients treated with two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask (FM) therapy.

Methods

A sample of 88 patients with Class III or Class III subdivision malocclusions, aged between 6 and 13 years, were consecutively selected and divided into three groups (G): G1-34 patients were treated with RME, followed by FM therapy; G2-34 patients were treated using RME according to modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (ALT-RAMEC) protocol, followed by FM therapy. These treated groups were randomly (1:1 allocation ratio) distributed according to the two treatment protocols. G3 – Control Group – 20 untreated patients were followed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) TMJs were obtained before (T1) and after (T2) a treatment period or follow-up. McNemar test, Fisher's exact test and intra- and inter-observer concordance (K) were performed (p ≤ .05).

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline cephalometric variables at T1 between the groups. There were statistically significant differences between the groups (p < .001) in relation to the disc shape in T1, since G1 (8 TMJs −11.76%) presented higher occurrences of altered forms in comparison with G2 (no changes). No significant differences were observed in disc position CM and OM (G1 – p > .999; G2 – p = .063; G3 – p = .500) and shape (G1 – p > 0.999; G2 – p = .250; G3 – not calculable), between T1 × T2, in any of the groups studied.

Conclusion

The two treatment protocols did not have adverse effects on the position and shape of the TMJ disc, in a short-term evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1