谁的专业知识最重要?女性幸存者与心理学家相处的经历。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Violence and Victims Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1891/VV-2021-0146
Sally Marsden, Cathy Humphreys, Kelsey Hegarty
{"title":"谁的专业知识最重要?女性幸存者与心理学家相处的经历。","authors":"Sally Marsden, Cathy Humphreys, Kelsey Hegarty","doi":"10.1891/VV-2021-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many women who experience intimate partner violence seek the expertise of psychologists to support their healing. However, there is a gap in the research about what women want from their psychologists. We interviewed 20 women survivors who had seen psychologists. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed three themes: see all of me, see me for my expertise, and don't impose an agenda on me. We found that often psychologists acted as experts imposing their own agendas, rather than supporting survivors to make their own decisions. We discuss this in relation to the link between knowledge and power through dominant social science discourses and explore how resistance to this dominant discourse was taken up by many women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48139,"journal":{"name":"Violence and Victims","volume":"39 1","pages":"71-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose Expertise Counts? Women Survivors' Experiences With Psychologists.\",\"authors\":\"Sally Marsden, Cathy Humphreys, Kelsey Hegarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/VV-2021-0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many women who experience intimate partner violence seek the expertise of psychologists to support their healing. However, there is a gap in the research about what women want from their psychologists. We interviewed 20 women survivors who had seen psychologists. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed three themes: see all of me, see me for my expertise, and don't impose an agenda on me. We found that often psychologists acted as experts imposing their own agendas, rather than supporting survivors to make their own decisions. We discuss this in relation to the link between knowledge and power through dominant social science discourses and explore how resistance to this dominant discourse was taken up by many women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence and Victims\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"71-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence and Victims\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2021-0146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence and Victims","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2021-0146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多经历过亲密伴侣暴力的女性都会寻求心理学家的专业知识来帮助她们治愈创伤。然而,关于女性希望从心理学家那里得到什么的研究还存在空白。我们采访了 20 位曾经看过心理医生的女性幸存者。通过反思性主题分析,我们构建了三个主题:看到我的全部、看到我的专长、不要把议程强加给我。我们发现,心理学家常常以专家的身份强加自己的议程,而不是支持幸存者做出自己的决定。我们通过占主导地位的社会科学话语,结合知识与权力之间的联系对此进行了讨论,并探讨了许多女性是如何抵制这种占主导地位的话语的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whose Expertise Counts? Women Survivors' Experiences With Psychologists.

Many women who experience intimate partner violence seek the expertise of psychologists to support their healing. However, there is a gap in the research about what women want from their psychologists. We interviewed 20 women survivors who had seen psychologists. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed three themes: see all of me, see me for my expertise, and don't impose an agenda on me. We found that often psychologists acted as experts imposing their own agendas, rather than supporting survivors to make their own decisions. We discuss this in relation to the link between knowledge and power through dominant social science discourses and explore how resistance to this dominant discourse was taken up by many women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Violence and Victims
Violence and Victims CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: We all face the difficult problem of understanding and treating the perpetrators and victims of violence behavior. Violence and Victims is the evidence-based resource that informs clinical decisions, legal actions, and public policy. Now celebrating its 25th year, Violence and Victims is a peer-reviewed journal of theory, research, policy, and clinical practice in the area of interpersonal violence and victimization. It seeks to facilitate the exchange of information on this subject across such professional disciplines as psychology, sociology, criminology, law, medicine, nursing, psychiatry, and social work.
期刊最新文献
Animals as Covictims and More-Than-Property: The Inclusion of Companion Animals in Protection Order Statutes at the State Level in the United States. Can Witnessing Domestic Violence Predict Risky Health Behaviors of University Students? Mass-Shooting Survivors: Advancing Research and Practice. Working With Youth Who Have Experienced Commercial Sexual Exploitation: Voices From the Field. Religious Coping Styles Used by Young Black Women Who Experience DatingViolence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1