开发可靠的神经生物标志物,用于预测对治疗抑郁症的非侵入性脑部刺激的反应

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101369
Emmet McNickle , Lamia Tadjine , Kathy Ruddy
{"title":"开发可靠的神经生物标志物,用于预测对治疗抑郁症的非侵入性脑部刺激的反应","authors":"Emmet McNickle ,&nbsp;Lamia Tadjine ,&nbsp;Kathy Ruddy","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202/pdfft?md5=0eb6d9126d7e20d4157d61338e2187fb&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a reliable neural biomarker for predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of depression\",\"authors\":\"Emmet McNickle ,&nbsp;Lamia Tadjine ,&nbsp;Kathy Ruddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202/pdfft?md5=0eb6d9126d7e20d4157d61338e2187fb&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154624000202-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)等非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)方法正迅速成为有效且耐受性良好的抑郁症治疗方法。最新的头对头研究表明,经颅磁刺激、经颅直流电刺激和广泛使用的药物抗抑郁剂的临床疗效相当,因此迫切需要转变治疗模式,将其作为低成本、低风险的一线抑郁症治疗方法。在此,我们通过叙述性综述概述了目前阻碍将 NIBS 方法转化为大规模临床应用的障碍,以期开发出一种神经生物标志物,及早将患者分层为潜在应答者或非应答者。我们描述了 TMS 诱发电位如何提供皮质兴奋性的标记,该标记可用作 NIBS 用户是否能从为实现神经调节而定制的方法中获益的基线预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a reliable neural biomarker for predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of depression

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are rapidly emerging as effective and well-tolerated treatments for depression. With the most recent head-to-head studies demonstrating equivalence in clinical efficacy between rTMS, tDCS and widely used pharmaceutical antidepressants, there is urgent need for a paradigm shift towards its inclusion as a low-cost, low-risk frontline treatment for depression. Here, we provide a narrative review outlining barriers currently impeding translation of NIBS approaches into large-scale clinical use, with a view to developing a neural biomarker that could provide early stratification of patients as potential responders or non-responders. We describe how the TMS-evoked potential provides a marker of cortical excitability that could be used as a baseline predictor of whether the NIBS user will derive benefit from approaches tailored to achieve neuromodulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions Nonsynaptic encoding of behavior by neuropeptides Stress-free indulgence: indulge adaptively to promote goal pursuit and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1